This is a bit stupid, rather the trans in court would rather quality as asexual or "non-gender" as their female parts are non functional and yet they are definetley not male.

So by the same logic if a man puts ona wig and false tits, he qualifies as a woman?

Welcome them aboard !!



They are proof that many women are completely nuts. They don't need nuts to try to have almost everything a man has.

I jest, of course.

I have some sympathy for people who have such mental anguish at sensing that they are in the wrong body. It is a form of self-mutilation, a shade more severe than having a thing for tattoos.

These two will be chaps with an extra pocket and no fear of catching their knobs in their zips.!!

The world is nuts enough to spare a few nuts for them.

@Richard
That is the intent of transgender community-- that despite biological traits, and indeed, the very fundamental difference starting at the chromosomal level, that persons be recognized as the gender that they identify as.

For example, it is considered rude to refer to male transsexuals (wig & false tits) by anything but their preferred female pronoun.

Transgender issues are complicated, provocative and confusing exactly because they break across natural gender barriers, expectations, legal issues, etc. in BOTH directions.

In Australia, if a man disguises himself as a woman, is he eligible for preferential treatment under affirmative action? Is he (she?) exempt from the draft, and able to sit by minors on Quantas?