1) If she were his intellectual equal, why would she have to be dependent upon marrying him to establish her future, with special emphasis upon his money? As in...
Frankly, someone who is my equal doesn't have to resort to such backstabbing deception in order to get the better of me. Nor do they have to engage the persuasive power of governmental force. Nor do they have to perjure themselves in court. But I digress....
2) So that "he can get laid more cheaply"? Really? I have found it is quite easy to get laid for free. Is it possible to get laid more cheaply than that? I suppose I COULD request donations, but now we have crossed the line from "cheaply" into "profit," so I don't suppose that helps us any.
Let me get this straight - a successful attorney who can afford to travel to Russia - to date - is going to have a difficult time getting attention at the local dance club, church, or workout arena?
I can barely walk home at times without getting a few passes thrown my way, and I barely have two nickels to rub together
(though I am hopeful that I will soon be hired by Antimisandry.com and will thereby participate in the great profits from this astounding enterprise!).
These cogent observations [sic] by Jezebel.com simply point to a truth at the core of what is wrong with
feminism: these chicks are so amazingly clueless that it isn't possible for them to actually participate in reality.
They are living in imaginary worlds with imaginary friends, enjoying the constant flow of chocolate rivers, eternally-blooming roses, and lesbian fairies sprinkling sexual pixie dust thither and yon. But be careful! Don't walk too far into the forest, for there be MEN in them woods!
In Freud's day, we called it a "neurosis."