Yesterday, just before I left for work, I received this hilarious email.

--------------------------------

EXCERPT OF THE WEEK | The Guys Guide To Feminism

"Feminists don’t want to be men. They don’t want to replace men. They don’t hate men. They just want women to be treated equally in as many ways as we possibly can be. It’s really that simple."

Men of quality aren't afraid of women's equality

--------------------------------

Some of you may recall the last-line from the following thread on AM.
Feminism Is A Business - MenAreBetterThanWomen.com

Quote from Unregistered

‎"Feminists don’t want to be men. They don’t want to replace men. They don’t hate men. They just want women to be treated equally in as many ways as we possibly can be. It’s really that simple."

And just remember this boys, MEN of QUALITY are not afraid of WOMEN'S EQUALITY

(note the additional attempt at shaming by referring to male members of this board as 'boys' instead of adults)



So I thought I'd spent half an hour going over his url and giving a bit of a reality check for this poor emasculated chap.

Remembering this person claimed that women don't want to replace men and only be treated as equals while accounting that back when college & university students were male it was feminists who demanded changes to the academic system to encourage more women into further education.

Demography News Flash (2012):
In our colleges and universities, well over 50 percent of students are women. They’re the majority of medical students, law students, and business students.

So we're left with the question, if feminism is about 'equality' then why do they only demand changes that benefit women but once women are dominating in any area, they suddenly go silent - as if they just don't care about men falling behind? I've seen on many feminist resources over the years feminists defending this double-standard with such claims as 'boys simply don't care about education' or even 'girls are simply better'. Now, where's this equality thing gone?

The blog page then goes on to credit feminism for giving women education, feminism for the pill and feminism for just about everything possible. Apparently, the class "women's studies" is only about promoting women's involvement in history. That seems a little suspect as I was taught about various female figures in my normal history class from my first-school all the way up to my high-school. So at the least, "women's studies" seems to be asking for more credit than men. Personally, my experience with "women's studies" students suggests the class is more about indoctrinating students with claims of a mass-conspiracy where all men hold all women down and promotes women to be aggressive and hold grudges towards men as a class.

Do you believe that women should have the right to:

• Vote?
• Go to college?
• Drive a car?
• Open bank accounts in their own names?
• Enjoy sex?
• Work in whatever occupation they might choose, and get paid the same as men when they do the same work?

Did you answer yes?

Then you better lie down. . . . You’ve probably caught feminism.
The feminist contagion has spread far and wide. It infects both women and men. Most people in North America, Europe and many parts of the rest of the world have caught it. The terrible truth is that, nowadays, most of us support these rights and actually see them as basic rights of individuals in a democracy.

Now if ever there was a case of fraudulent propaganda, this might just be it.

Note how the author tries to imply that feminism was responsible for women having the right to vote. Not accurate. In fact, it was women's-libbers & suffragettes who fought for women's right to vote, not feminists.

A deeper look into history shows us that not only did the above groups push for women to have the vote, they also tried to stop men having the vote. It wasn't just a push for their sex to vote, they actively fought against men having the right to vote.

Pop-quiz question: "Why do pro-feminists systematically 'forget' to discuss this part of history when they talk about the vote?"

Keeping on the topic of the vote, the author mentions going to college... Just prior to this reference, it is openly acknowledged that women could go to college before the feminist movement took hold in the 60s.

Equally, to my knowledge (and I'm happy to be corrected) but women were never officially denied any right to drive - at least not in Western countries.

One thing I do want to draw attention to, that I'm sure many of you already know, is that for a man to obtain a driver's license, obtain a college loan, take certain career paths or issue his vote for his preferred political candidate; he must agree to sign up to be drafted. If he doesn't - he faces financial charges as well as a prison sentence.

The same conditions are not enforced against women at any level. The claim by feminists and their sympathizers is that they promote equality for women and men. Amazingly enough, no feminist I know of either at a personal level nor online, has yet managed to make any effort to draw attention to this incredible disparity that blatantly affects men negatively. Not even one.

I can't speak for the bank-loan side of things as I don't have enough information to hand to form an educated opinion either way. However, what I can say is that for the vast majority of feminist-inspired claims I come across, they most commonly aren't quite as the feminists portray them to be.

To illustrate my point, just look at how feminists portray FGM and compare it against Western standards of circumcision. Look at how feminist politician, Harriet Harman, likes to compare part-time female employees against full-time male employees in order to skew the figures and misrepresent the mythical 'wage gap'. They have to compare apples with oranges to make their case.

Given the repetitive nature of feminist deception, I wouldn't be surprised to find there's something considerably important left-out of their claims regarding women not having a bank-loan without the husband's signature. Perhaps, it had something to do with the fact that most women opted not to gain paid employment, so the money loaned out would have to be paid back by the husband. In which case, it makes perfect sense that if I choose to be unemployed and want a loan, the bank will need the payee to sign for his or her agreement to pay back on my behalf.

Of course, feminists being as they are, we can't expect them to talk honestly about the bank-loan signature being required... They choose to intentionally with-hold massively important factors in order to skew the picture to portray men as oppressors and women as eternal victims of 'teh patriarchy'.

As I said, I don't enough to say anything for certain on this subject... the above is merely speculation on my part.

Now, let's see about feminism being responsible for women enjoying sex...

That's all I have to say about that. Women have been enjoying sex since the dawn of time. Feminism had nothing to do with biology.

However, I do acknowledge feminism did open certain jobs to women that previously they were steered away from. Unsurprisingly, feminists have done nothing to promote jobs for men that they are traditionally steered away from. In fact, they have done the complete opposite by promoting hate campaigns against men as sexually deprived beasts who will rape & molest any women or children within reach. This ensured that men were not and remain to this day unwelcome in female-dominated careers, such as child-care.

Moving on to the 'same pay for the same work', well that simply isn't quite how feminists portray it. By measuring only the medium averages of all workers, it clearly excludes like-for-like jobs. It also ignores work hours, of which men typically work some 6+ hours more (excludes additional work in the home by men) than women per week. Further, women take more holidays than men as well as more sick time from work.

But then they’ll have the nerve to point out that even the United States has never ratified the United Nation’s Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; they’ll tell you that Congress turned down an amendment to prohibit discrimination against women.

And it comes as no shock that they don't even ask why the UN doesn't have a similar policy for men - at all. Nor will they ask why so much money is afforded women's groups while only pennies are put aside for men's groups. The same is found in all walks of life, such as health funding, awareness campaigns, health & safety, sexual & reproductive rights, etc. etc.
In short, feminists are, as proven by their own action & inaction, not about equality - but rather selective equality at best.

The empirical observation is that, in our society, women and men are still not equal. (Beware: if you find yourself noticing men form the big majority of those who run local, state and federal governments, major corporations, colleges and universities, religious institutions, and media conglomerates.

Again, feminists look only to the top and ignore the bottom. Men are found in all the lowest areas too, such as homelessness, health, suicide rates, etc.
Sadly, feminists only point to the top end in order to misrepresent the world we live in. If they had an ounce of honesty about them, they would look at the full picture and use that to gauge the needs of the many. Instead, they hack off a third of the image (showing men at the bottom) and present their mutilated picture as a realistic picture of the world in which we live.

You start thinking that in our personal relationships women deserve to have total respect and dignity!

As predictable, men don't get a mention where respect and dignity is spoken... aside from giving it to women. It should be clear by now that feminism is not about equality, but rather demanding that men treat women a certain way while women's ill-behaviours towards men continue to be ignored, and thus, condoned by the feminist community.

That they should be a partner in all decision-making!

Does this go for men too, I wonder? In today's world - women make the majority of decisions in a home. Which school the children go to, what car the family buy, what products & foods are purchased, will the father of a child be allowed any level of a relationship to their child, and many more areas.
Given that feminism claims to support equality... we have to keep asking, why are feminists so silent on areas of inequality that detrimentally affect men?

* Watch out if you buy a T-shirt with a slogan like: “A Man of Quality Isn’t Threatened by Women’s Equality.”

* Run for the hills if you wear a T-shirt that reads: Real Men Support Feminism.

Can women also buy a shirt, stating alike to: "A Woman of Quality Isn't Threatened by Men's Equality"? Somehow, I'm guessing that concept causes a tear in your eye and a sinking feeling in your gut.
Why might it do that? Because, as a feminist, like most feminists, you are a sexist - and promoting equality of men to women only causes upset for you - because you're a sexist.
Note also the reliance again on shaming tactics employed. Now feminists think they have the right to determine what makes a 'real man'.