Feminists Disrupt a Forum About Battered Husbands

[Tyrael]

Men's activists hold a public forum to discuss the possibility of giving male victims of domestic violence some of the social services that are currently only available to female victims. Feminists, who strongly oppose any recognition of male victims of abuse, disrupt the forum and try to shut it down. They oppose free and open discussion of gender issues. This video is reproduced with the permission of www.fathers.ca .

[SmtmsAlwys]

That was really special. And I mean that in the short-bus kind of way.

I'm not disagreeing about the existence of battered men, so please don't attack me. I'm just amazed at the sheer stupidity of the women shown. Good Lord! Even if they somehow had a valid point - although it escaped me as I viewed - it would be completely lost in all of the screaming, swearing, and attacking. Sheesh!!

[Celtic Druid]

Feminists fear domestic violence becoming 'rightfully' viewed as a people problem, rather than just something that solely affects women (something Erin Pizzey sought to achieve decades ago when she opened up the first DV shelter in the UK, who later went into hiding after rad fems threatened her life for taking such a egalitarian stance. Ironic or what?). Then, their dictatorial power base will be diluted, a platform to demonize men will be lost, and the general public will become more aware of men, the elderly (elder abuse) and children as victims.

The masses would learn via substantiated empirical evidence that women commit equal amounts of DV against men, commit the majority of physical abuse and murder of children (mostly boys. Misandric mothers?), and are the biggest abusers of the elderly. When you realize this, you can understand why fems and yes "many women" fanatically oppose children, men, and the elderly from being recognized as DV victims. Because 'collectively' women are the biggest abusers of all three groups.

Is it any wonder why these misandric lunatics are intent on stifling any such forums, as it represents a step closer to 40+ years of deceitful propaganda from being washed away, and people becoming awakened to the great DV fraud that has been perpetrated for so long. Not too mention the "DV industry" has been a very lucrative scam for feminists, to the tune of billions in the US via VAWA.

Think about it, it's a bigots dream. Not only is it legal too promote your hatred (misandry) but the government will assist you by introducing a two-tier system of law and justice divided along gender lines, abdicate responsibility, legally/morally legislate against any 'valid' male dissent, provide jack booted "enforcers" at the slightest whim (the police) and payout handsome subsidies (ironically paid for mostly by mens taxes) to indulge in your hateful quest to emasculate and enslave the male population.

Crime pays, so does bigotry more so!

[julie]

Celtic Druid says, two-tier system of law

I have been trying to get information about this on the net but it doesn't come up. What is this 2 tier and 3 tier? The government apparently has it. I am thinking these are the policy makers.

[khankrumthebulgar]

Feminists have been used to having their way for 4 decades now in the US. For the first time Men are pushing back and hard. We have had our fill of it and will be silent no more. They can insult us all they want, but they will no longer go unchallenged. The Lesbians Leading the charge are going to find a Much more Militant, Angry and Confrontational male than in the past. Reason has not worked, pleas for some kind of dialog has not worked.

So be it. There will be confrontation and escalation if needed. We are going to Storm the Gates and take our culture back from the FemNags. Whether they like it or not.

[Celtic Druid]

Celtic Druid says, two-tier system of law

I have been trying to get information about this on the net but it doesn't come up. What is this 2 tier and 3 tier? The government apparently has it. I am thinking these are the policy makers.

Apologies for a belated response. I thought intially you were taking the piss inquiring as to what is a 'two-tier system of law.' Then I realized I musn't expect standards of realization that even many supposed MRA's cannot fulfill.

Essentially a two-tier system of law is enacted based (not solely) on the premise of some previous "perceived" wrong enacted upon one group (women) by men and any legal enactment is morally enshrined within the reparations demanded forthwith because of this.

As was the treatment of blacks compared to the different treatment of whites during slavery comparable to a two-tiered system of law. That is, given the same crime commited by a white would be treated far more leniently than a black person doing the same. Shit, that bigotry still exists to this date! That's a two-tier system of law. Some people argue the legal disparity between men and women today, is comparable to what previously existed between whites and blacks. As a African friend exclaimed to me (totally unprompted) "men are the new niggers."

A two-tier system of law has rigid legal/moral expectations of one group (men) which aren't applied "equally" to women. That's a two-tiered system of law!

As a man experience the two-tier system of law regarding false allegations, divorce, through to child custody, then you begin to understand the existence of a two-tier system of law defined by gender!

[julie]

Thanx for the explanation Celtic Druid. I wasn't taking the piss out of what you said.

[Celtic Druid]

Thanx for the explanation Celtic Druid

No problem.

I wasn't taking the piss out of what you said

I realize that now. Expecting others and the "unawakened" to grasp the reality of what so ails men, is to be politically naive and presumptuous of the "sleeping masses" to comphrehend a concept beyond their "social conditioning."

Obviously I'm not directly refering to you, as, given the very fact you are engaging in a logical process of enquiring and questioning - eliminates you from being affiliated to the brainwashed masses.

Keep questioning Julie.

The well being of any true democracy is gauged by the unbridled inquisitiveness and questioning of it's population. Never relent in questioning the status quo! To do otherwise ensures a nefarious impinging proliferation of state influence and control. People should never fear it's government, government should fear it's people. Gone off on a tangent? Yes, so, and?

[Witch Hunter]

Well, its the same old story isn't it? Revolutionary becomes reactionary.
Like Stalin purging against "counter-revolution", Feminists are keen to shut the door on any debate that threatens what for them, is a comfortable status quo. I remember watching a Canadian TV debate between some old dragon who was batting for the lesbians & interestingly, a young intelligent woman who was up for us. The battle-axe was on & on about the possibility of the state being required to fund something for men, as if the mere thought was well, unthinkable. Never mind the fact that her kind would be extinct if not for the benefit of a collective economy & the fact that men pay about 80% of the taxes that keep the country going.
The thing about Feminism is that it seems oblivious to the existence of money in the sense that all evidence suggests it has no concept of how it is made & especially, how much more women than men are dependent on it. We have all heard women demand funding or things that will obviously cost large amounts of money, but when was the last time you heard a Feminist proposal to create funding?
When was the 1st time?
Has there been any time?
This my friends, is why it will all go belly-up eventually. If women were genuinely what Feminism claims them to be, Feminist laws would not be childishly one-sided, women would not consider slander as a legitimate means of obtaining homes & custody of children, Feminism would take the measure of social responsibility that it currently shrinks from instead of falsely complaining that women are held back & women would generally have some kind of code of conduct & pride in themselves as a gender, like men do. In reality, Feminism merely represents a denial to most women of a traditional way of life. It has put them on the street, turns them into desperates & the one-sided Family Law systems we suffer under are merely a means by which Feminism forces men to give women what it previously preached only about abandoning. Hence fanatics seek viciously to control the agenda in order to survive; to keep the majority of normal, non-lesbian women from turning on the freaks who have made life so hard for us all.
I was looking at IFeminist, the NOW site or some other digital rag the other day & there was the headline: "Top female-friendly firms not doing enough". Or something similar. I learned that the companies that have built the most in-house child-care facilities, been the most flexible with working hours & provided similar things that working mums & other women like to have, are just not doing enough. It was not made clear how these things are quantified exactly & who is qualified to gauge them objectively, but I guess that's not important.
So, hands-up if you think there ever will be enough. An interesting creative writing exercise would be trying describe a world in which Feminist were actually content. I mean, we only have one planet so how can we have enough stuff to keep women happy & still worry about men? We will have to find our own planet, just as soon as we finish building everything here for the girls. But of course, we will still have to fly back to Earth to cut lawns, put the garbage out & lift anything that happens to be heavy.

[knight-errant]

This is something that I posted on another forum but it feels like it's relevant to this discussion:

A creature that can't be happy no matter how much it gets its own way was never meant to have things its own way.

[Aug9th-LiveOrDie]

the vid makes a perfect case for armed security at MRA rallies

[gwallan]

As was the treatment of blacks compared to the different treatment of whites during slavery comparable to a two-tiered system of law. That is, given the same crime commited by a white would be treated far more leniently than a black person doing the same. Shit, that bigotry still exists to this date! That's a two-tier system of law. Some people argue the legal disparity between men and women today, is comparable to what previously existed between whites and blacks. As a African friend exclaimed to me (totally unprompted) "men are the new niggers."

I believe analyses in the US show that gender is a more accurate predictor of sentence length than race.