Generation of young women are putting off motherhood due to money worries.

**nevosopelo** · 27th-July-2011

This article may not be an accurate one, hence, may be considered a misleading feature ran in it. The assertion made is that more than four in ten working women in their twenties have their children in their thirties or forties.
The fact is four out of ten of a population of workers which still is less than fifty per cent of all country's workers, does not constitute a generation of women. How many does it make four out of ten of fifty per cent? Yes, around twenty per cent of the total. That's hardly a whole generation.
This distorted view of the life of working people may be opposed by the epidemic of single parents families, which is fast approaching two millions in the UK. This young and old mothers are mostly not working and, in the case of teenage mothers, not qualified to pursue any meaningful employment. Take this quotation for example, "Researchers describe the trend as worrying". Really? since when a minority of "Trendy" women should worry anybody?
The current trends in society which are lead by daft laws, should be worrying every one as most families who have managed to stay together are, literally speaking, supporting millions of women who are dropping sprogs at a rate never seen before without any visible means of financial self-support.

Generation of young women put off motherhood due to money worries | Mail Online

The report said: ‘We find, worryingly, that a significant minority of women have delayed having children due simply to financial factors. The proportion who might do so in future is even higher.’

This quote is nothing more than wishful thinking, because the proportions may go up and down, but in the long term will remain level. Frankly, this article is no more than a panic in a tea cup, sigh!

NEVO

**le jacquelope** · 29th-July-2011

They should turn their attention to Japan and Germany. Now THERE is where the real problem is, if they think it's a problem. Check out the child birth rates there.

**Percy** · 29th-July-2011

Financial matters, eh.

What they mean is that they are suddenly realising that THEY have to pay because fewer men are willing to carry them any more.

**Celtic Druid** · 29th-July-2011

Women curtailing what naturally compells them to do is the saddest state of sovereign affairs.

**Missy-A** · 29th-July-2011

Quote from Percy

Financial matters, eh.

What they mean is that they are suddenly realising that THEY have to pay because fewer men are willing to carry them any more.

Agreed.

**Zuberi** · 29th-July-2011

Money Worries? That never stopped the welfare parasites who drop out of school and intentionally get pregnant.

**haute macabre** · 29th-July-2011

At least they won't be using kids for welfare.No one should be having kids, if they can't properly provide them.

**christianj** · 30th-July-2011

As the marriage strike gathers speed, women are just unable to work out what the problem really is. They presume that it's men who have issues instead of realising that being attached to a member of the opposite sex has now become so toxic that it's more of a future invitation to doing some jail time at her whim..

That is if you survive the divorce court reeming and the financial rape that involves..

**Glaucon** · 30th-July-2011

Interesting that the comments are closed on this article written by Steve Doughty: I wonder if someone might ascertain Doughty’s email address.
Most troubling the main article does not name or cite the studies referred to. In the Side piece buried in the middle there are more un-cited assertions. Truly this deserves to be a campaign and the assetrions challenged unless Doughty can provide the appropriate citations.

**christianj** · 30th-July-2011

Quote from Glaucon

Interesting that the comments are closed on this article written by Steve Doughty: I wonder if someone might ascertain Doughty’s email address.
Most troubling the main article does not name or cite the studies referred to. In the Side piece buried in the middle there are more un-cited assertions. Truly this deserves to be a campaign and the assetrions challenged unless Doughty can provide the appropriate citations.

Normally, when there are no links, it's just another attempt by feminists to waylay the real reason or to try and suggest that it really is women who are taking "control" rather than admit their policies and doctrines have killed off relationships. That would take a feminist confession of massive proportions and one they are not capable of making being the hypocrites and cowards they are..