Thread: Can Tera identify any problems with feminism?

I would also add that when those types of restrictions were in place, more men owned land than did women. That may still be the case today. I have not the data to back this up, but even if I did, I'm sure people would question it.

'More men hold political offices and positions of authority.'

..I must also point out that women are severely under-represented in road maintainance, but I'm not sure that automatically counts as evidence for discrimination.

Political / 'authoritarian (?)' offices also requires the kind of dedication that rules out early retirement or much of a family life - can you show how women who are prepared to make those choices are discriminated against?

If you can find some references / data, I would love to discuss this with you, Tera, but until we have that I'm afraid you're just stating an opinion.

'more men owned land than did women'..

Tera, can you show how this does not include joint ownership, for example by husband and wife?

[quote=TERA;64595]

• Timeline for women's suffrage, globally:

It is obvious from Tera's post that MEN are missing from her "TImeline." Obviously, men are not important enough to bother including in such statistics, and in fact men are invisible.

The whole thing is totally sexist.

Get back to us Tera when you can drop the misnadrist postings.

Blessings

Bob

Quote from bobx23456

Get back to us Tera when you can drop the misnadrist postings.

I have (cordially) to disagree with you there, Bob..

I'm most keen to see Tera support her assertations for all to see.

Quote from TERA

No I don't have that information but would like very much to see it. I concede, there are times throughout history that men could not vote, either, unless they owned land, for example. If you could post a timeline on the history of men's right to vote, I think that would be fantastic!

What sexist crapola. Men voting is rare throughout history, yet Tera tells us that "there are times" as if men not voting was an exception. The reverse is true. Voting at all is rare, and almost as rare for men as for females. Yet men's voting is omitted from Tera's "timeline" because men are missing from Tera's view of "people."

Feminism is the radical notion that only women are people.

Blessings

Bob

Quote from bobx23456

What sexist crapola. Men voting is rare throughout history, yet Tera tells us that "there are times" as if men not voting was an exception.

However, Tera is correct in saying that we should get a solid study of this out there. After all, I think it would be unfair of us to demand references and data from Tera and not to support what we say also.

Quote from TERA

How are women coming out on top in "every conceivable way"? More women and children live in poverty than men.

LOL. With over 95% of homeless being men that's a huge claim. We also know that females exercise about 75% of discretionary spending, receive 75% of medical care, and own the majority of assetts in the US. In the US there are millions of men in prisons and jails. Yet Tera tells us that more women live in poverty.

Please provide some shred of evidence.


Blessings

Bob

Quote from TERA

I've been learning quite a bit about research methods in my psych classes. And I can tell you what my prof told me: for every study that shows a particular result, more often than not, you can find another that disproves that result. (And this being said of all studies, not just psychological studies/research.)

From my own experience, I tend to agree.

One of the problems that feminism has caused is that studies and professors now have ZERO credibility. The lie after lie after more lies of feminism have destroyed all their previous credibility. Its going to take a long while of honest research before professors, universities, and studies have any acceptance at all.

Blessings

Bob

Quote from bobx23456

Please provide some shred of evidence.

I'd hate to see this dicussion unravel because some cannot support what they say.

It's tempting to think that this is the reason why feminists resort to shaming and censorship rather than to actually talk to us, isn't it Bob? ;-)

Quote from Exposing Feminism

However, Tera is correct in saying that we should get a solid study of this out there. After all, I think it would be unfair of us to demand references and data from Tera and not to support what we say also.

Read any history book on men voting. The Ancient Greeks had popular voting in some centuries BCE, but throughout the Roman Empire rule and subsequent dark ages and middle ages some Emperor, King, Bishop, etc., ruled. When the US Colonies started voting that was a radical political idea for its time, and even then it was generally limited to land owners, men and women, not popular suffrage. Most of the world didn't have voting by men until sometime in the 20th century and much of it still doesn't. Voting by men is very new.

Yet Tera posts data that ignores men entirely, men are invisible. She pretends that voting by men has been the historical standard to play women-->victim.

Blessings

Bob

Quote from bobx23456

Yet Tera posts data that ignores men entirely, men are invisible.

It should be noted that Tera 'cut and pasted' the timeline from Wikipedia - who still refuse to allow an MGTOW article because of 'copyright' violations..

Are we not allowed to cut and paste Wikipedia information? I did not know.