well here i go again back on the dole

[mikewitney]

well the CSA found me at my job and they want 160 pounds a week for 2 kids i only earn £400 a week and now i cant afford to pay my rent

so i have to go on the dole and claim housing benift

im not a sciver but its alll i can do to look after my family now

its a bad world when u have to stop work to survive

[bobx23456]

Originally Posted by mikewitney

well the CSA found me at my job and they want 160 pounds a week for 2 kids i only earn £400 a week and now i cant afford to pay my rent

so i have to go on the dole and claim housing benift

im not a sciver but its alll i can do to look after my family now

its a bad world when u have to stop work to survive

In the US they would send you to debtor's prison for losing your job and not paying the C$. Your living on the street is not their problem.

Of course, in debtor's prison, you would have a place to live.

Blessings

Bob

[TERA]

Originally Posted by bobx23456

In the US they would send you to debtor's prison for losing your job and not paying the C$. Your living on the street is not their problem.

Of course, in debtor's prison, you would have a place to live.

Blessings

Bob

Though I have not gone after my ex for child support, apparently the state is doing this in my stead. I just got this letter (will exclude names for the sake of anonymity):

Dear __________:

The Washington State Office of Support Enforcement has referred your case to this office for proceedings in court to attempt to collect child support. Your case is being handled initially by our Contempt Intake and Filing Unit. After our process is underway, the case may be transferred to a litigation team to be assigned later.

SERVICE OF PROCESS ON THE RESPONDENT

The court action we will be starting is a civil contempt-of-court proceeding, in which will be the "Respondent." We will, if necessary, obtain from the court an Order to Show Cause requiring him to appear in court on a certain date and show good cause why he should not be found in contempt of court for failing to pay child support as previously ordered. It may be necessary to serve an Order to Show Cause directly on Mr. ______ before the court will have jurisdiction to hear the case; if so, we will at that time mail you copies of the documents we prepare for service.

Attempts to serve papers on respondents are often unsuccessful. If service is not made, a new court date must be set and further attempts made to serve papers. This process may be repeated several times before service is successful, and that may take several months. It is also common that respondents fail to appear for court after being served. If that happens, a bench warrant may be issued and turned over to the Sheriff's Office. It can be several weeks, or months, before the respondent is arrested on the warrant.

CIVIL CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS

Once the case gets to court, the contempt process is ongoing. The ultimate sanction, time in jail, is almost never ordered immediately. After the first court hearing, it is common to set regular review dates, which enable the office to monitor the respondent's compliance with the court's orders. It is not necessary for you (meaning me) to attend court hearings. In fact, many matters are handled informally outside the court. Our ultimate goal is to get current support paid each and every month, together with payments on the back support debt. You must realize that this probably will not be easy. Generally, there has been a long history of non-payment before the case is referred to this office, and many issues must be resolved before payments will be made regularly. It also must be remembered that respondents have rights to due process which must be respected and which may cause delays.

*This letter was quoted verbatim. And this case from Washington state.

[TERA]

Originally Posted by TERA

Though I have not gone after my ex for child support, apparently the state is doing this in my stead. I just got this letter (will exclude names for the sake of anonymity):

Dear __________:

The Washington State Office of Support Enforcement has referred your case to this office for proceedings in court to attempt to collect child support. Your case is being handled initially by our Contempt Intake and Filing Unit. After our process is underway, the case may be transferred to a litigation team to be assigned later.

SERVICE OF PROCESS ON THE RESPONDENT

The court action we will be starting is a civil contempt-of-court proceeding, in which will be the "Respondent." We will, if necessary, obtain from the court an Order to Show Cause requiring him to appear in court on a certain date and show good cause why he should not be found in contempt of court for failing to pay child support as previously ordered. It may be necessary to serve an Order to Show Cause directly on Mr. ______ before the court will have jurisdiction to hear the case; if so, we will at that time mail you copies of the documents we prepare for service.

Attempts to serve papers on respondents are often unsuccessful. If service is not made, a new court date must be set and further attempts made to serve papers. This process may be repeated several times before service is successful, and that may take several months. It is also common that respondents fail to appear for court after being served. If that happens, a bench warrant may be issued and turned over to the Sheriff's Office. It can be several weeks, or months, before the respondent is arrested on the warrant.

CIVIL CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS

Once the case gets to court, the contempt process is ongoing. The ultimate sanction, time in jail, is almost never ordered immediately. After the first court hearing, it is common to set regular review dates, which enable the office to monitor the respondent's compliance with the court's orders. It is not necessary for you (meaning me) to attend court hearings. In fact, many matters are handled informally outside the court. Our ultimate goal is to get current support paid each and every month, together with payments on the back support debt. You must realize that this probably will not be easy. Generally, there has been a long history of non-payment before the case is referred to this office, and many issues must be resolved before payments will be made regularly. It also must be remembered that respondents have rights to due process which must be respected and which may cause delays.

*This letter was quoted verbatim. And this case from Washington state.

Oh and BTW....my divorce became final in 2001. This letter was received about two weeks ago....SEVEN YEARS later. During which time I have not received a single dime of child support for our three kids. And I did not and have not gone after him for the money.

[bobx23456]

Originally Posted by TERA

Though I have not gone after my ex for child support, apparently the state is doing this in my stead. I just got this letter (will exclude names for the sake of anonymity):

Dear __________:

The Washington State Office of Support Enforcement has referred your case to this office for proceedings in court to attempt to collect child support. Your case is being handled initially by our Contempt Intake and Filing Unit. After our process is underway, the case may be transferred to a litigation team to be assigned later.

Another example of how feminism works to destroy marriage, family, and fathers.

The evil feminist bureaucracy feeds off the destruction of fathers.

Blessings

Bob

[TERA]

Originally Posted by bobx23456

Another example of how feminism works to destroy marriage, family, and fathers.

The evil feminist bureaucracy feeds off the destruction of fathers.

Blessings

Bob

That's bullshit, Bob. Do you mean to tell me that a father should not at all be financially responsible in any way for his offspring?

[TERA]

I haven't received a single dollar toward the support of our three kids in seven years. And despite whatever "efforts" the state is trying to make on the behalf of our children, I doubt I'll ever see a single dime in the future. I struggle to make ends meet. I'm back in school so I can get a decent job to support these kids. And my ex is working under the table, lying about his income (claiming to have none) while partying it up with his friends getting high on meth and doing whatever the hell he pleases. On top of that, he doesn't make any effort to see his kids. No phone calls, no letters, nothing. And I've said this before, but I drive them over 100 miles to see his stupid ass and he drops them off at his parents' house when he has them, and leaves. I suppose that's for the best, really, all things considered.

[TERA]

Originally Posted by TERA

I haven't received a single dollar toward the support of our three kids in seven years. And despite whatever "efforts" the state is trying to make on the behalf of our children, I doubt I'll ever see a single dime in the future. I struggle to make ends meet. I'm back in school so I can get a decent job to support these kids. And my ex is working under the table, lying about his income (claiming to have none) while partying it up with his friends getting high on meth and doing whatever the hell he pleases. On top of that, he doesn't make any effort to see his kids. No phone calls, no letters, nothing. And I've said this before, but I drive them over 100 miles to see his stupid ass and he drops them off at his parents' house when he has them, and leaves. I suppose that's for the best, really, all things considered.

What irritates me is this: feminism does cause problems in society, but it is not the cause of EVERY problem. Some people do a perfectly fine job of screwing up their own lives, pure and simple, and really have no one to blame but themselves. My ex is not a victim of feminism. He's just a poor excuse for a human being. He could act like a decent father but he chooses not to because he's extraordinarily selfish.

[bobx23456]

Originally Posted by TERA

That's bullshit, Bob. Do you mean to tell me that a father should not at all be financially responsible in any way for his offspring?

LOl. Typical feminist drivel. PAY ME is the meaning of "child support." The feminist bureaucracy wants a cut, of course.

A child is supported by putting out a plate at dinner and a cot in the corner. Not by PAYING the woman for breaking up a man's family and stealing his children.

If she wants him to support his child en, she should bring his children back and beg for him to support them as females have done for a million years before feminism destroyed families and turned men into indentured servants (slaves).


Blessings

Bob

[TERA]

Originally Posted by bobx23456

LOl. Typical feminist drivel. PAY ME is the meaning of "child support." The feminist bureaucracy wants a cut, of course.

A child is supported by putting out a plate at dinner and a cot in the corner. Not by PAYING the woman for breaking up a man's family and stealing his children.

If she wants him to support his child en, she should bring his children back and beg for him to support them as females have done for a million years before feminism destroyed families and turned men into indentured servants (slaves).


Blessings

Bob

Right Bob. I'm going to run back to a person who thought nothing of attacking me with a knife or hitting me with whatever he could find to get his hands on in the heat of the moment. I'm gonna go running back to a guy who's whole idea of quality family life was getting drunk, being verbally abusive, and being high on meth for days at a time. I'm gonna go running back to having NO LIFE, no freedom whatsoever, and a husband who literally followed me to the grocery store because his jealous, paranoid, unstable mind caused him to think that every time I stepped out of the house I was going to cheat on him. I'm gonna go running back to a man who saw fit to choose my outfits for me, someone who never let me out of the house with friends. Someone who made my life and the lives of our kids a living hell. Yeah, Bob. Can't wait to go running back to that to beg him to contribute just a token donation to the well being of the children he helped bring into this world.

I'd rather put a loaded shot gun to my head than go back to that.

[bobx23456]

Originally Posted by TERA

Right Bob. I'm going to run back to a person who thought nothing of attacking me with a knife or hitting me with whatever he could find to get his hands on in the heat of the moment. I'm gonna go running back to a guy who's whole idea of quality family life was getting drunk, being verbally abusive, and being high on meth for days at a time. I'm gonna go running back to having NO LIFE, no freedom whatsoever, and a husband who literally followed me to the grocery store because his jealous, paranoid, unstable mind caused him to think that every time I stepped out of the house I was going to cheat on him. I'm gonna go running back to a man who saw fit to choose my outfits for me, someone who never let me out of the house with friends. Someone who made my life and the lives of our kids a living hell. Yeah, Bob. Can't wait to go running back to that to beg him to contribute just a token donation to the well being of the children he helped bring into this world.

I'd rather put a loaded shot gun to my head than go back to that.

Yada, yada, yada. They always blame the nearest available man for anything they do.

If you take his kids, hon, YOU are responsible to support them.

Blessings

Bob

[Percy]

I admire your pluck, TERA, raising your kids without the ex's support. Well done.

I have said it many times before - BOTH parents are wholly and totally, jointly and severally, accountable for raising and maintaining their children.

Sometimes one has to do it alone, when their spouse dies. Deliberately avoiding one's duty is not on.

The Government should NOT be involved at all.