Murderess kills father of three and walks out free from court.

[nevosopelo]

A murderess does a premeditated killing of a father of three girls and then walks out of court free after claiming domestic violence.

This morning on the sky news UK. was broadcasted how a woman premeditated the murder of her husband, who was shot twice in the head after he was unkowningly given sleeping pills in his food, walked free from court as did all others involved in the crime, after she claimed she was a victim of a violent husband.

It seems virtual reality has now become true reality in Australia. She claimed she had no choice, which is an obvious lie because in this age of feminism women are well overprotected.

The judges, once again, sided with a femitard and, against all evidence, including hiding the body and claiming he was missing to the police.

Shot the Bastard he is not good to any one!!!!!
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Wor...15643281?f=rss




MEN BEWARE OF THE TWAT!!!!!

NEVO

[rohara]

I read stories like these and I always have to say:What was his side of the story? Will we ever know? No! He's DEAD!

Sorry but pre-meditated murder is just that-MURDER. There is no excuse for killing someone in their sleep whatsoever. This whole "he wouldn't let her leave" thing is just a bunch of bulshit that way too many people buy.

[Zuberi]

A murderess does a premeditated killing of a father of three girls and then walks out of court free after claiming domestic violence.

This morning on the sky news UK. was broadcasted how a woman premeditated the murder of her husband, who was shot twice in the head after he was unkowningly given sleeping pills in his food, walked free from court as did all others involved in the crime, after she claimed she was a victim of a violent husband.

It seems virtual reality has now become true reality in Australia. She claimed she had no choice, which is an obvious lie because in this age of feminism women are well overprotected.

The judges, once again, sided with a femitard and, against all evidence, including hiding the body and claiming he was missing to the police.

Shot the Bastard he is not good to any one!!!!!
Australia: Abused Wife Susan Falls Acquitted Of Murder After Admitting Drugging And Shooting Husband | World News | Sky News




MEN BEWARE OF THE TWAT!!!!!

NEVO

I bet the bull dykes roared in ecstasy when they heard this news!

[Marx]

Winkler v2

[byslexic_danana]

It doesn't take a genius, to figure that DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIM OR NOT, any woman who kills a man she's lived with, is going to play this card, quite irrespective of whether or not she was a victim at all; after all, if a woman's evil enough to murder, she's surely immoral enough to LIE. So, unless the courts honestly believe that NO woman is EVER capable of murdering without reason (a ridiculous notion, given the evidence to prove otherwise), then the courts are GUARANTEEING that some guilty women will be walking free; but, hey, who cares about that, right?

At any rate, victim or not, it doesn't justify MURDER. It is BULLSHIT, to say that there's no other option, than to murder such a partner; look at how many domestic violence shelters WOMEN have access to.

Very little justifies murder; in case you're a woman, of course.

[byslexic_danana]

And, upon reading the article, it appears that one of the MEN, who supplied a weapon, got community service; as opposed to the ACTUAL murderess, who got nothing. Unbelievable.

[byslexic_danana]

Frankly, this is unbelievable. I'm sorry, but she COULD have left the relationship; the Police have the power to remove allegedly-violent husbands from their houses, she would have had friends and relatives, and there are domestic violence shelters.

Secondly, even if the allegations are true, it doesn't justify murder. I find it remarkable, how many people don't even condone the hanging of convicted murderers, yet, whenever a woman kills a supposedly-violent husband, the same people condone it; double standards, me thinks.

Thirdly, how do we know the allegations are true? Cases like this give women who wish to kill their partners for no reason, the opportunity to do so, and then be let off by playing the 'victim' card. It doesn't take a genius to figure that any woman who murders her husband, with OR WITHOUT reason, is going to claim abuse; and then GET AWAY WITH MURDER.

This is so typical, of the feministic, female-biased world that we westerners live in.

Now let's see if they post it....

[shaazam]

A murderess does a premeditated killing of a father of three girls and then walks out of court free after claiming domestic violence.




Shot the Bastard he is not good to any one!!!!!
Australia: Abused Wife Susan Falls Acquitted Of Murder After Admitting Drugging And Shooting Husband | World News | Sky News




MEN BEWARE OF THE TWAT!!!!!

NEVO

"It seems virtual reality has now become true reality in Australia""

- dar ain't nothing virtual about it ! it is the order of the day here!

the feminit agitprop has been hammering this DV nostrum for wimyn that kill for years now that even the judges believe it

it is a bit like confessing your sins to the priest judge before you cark !
straight to the Pearly Gates and to frolick in the Elysian fields forever

no horrible men in sight ( all believers in feminitism - ie manginas)

[Kargan3033]

What a bitch.
One big flag though, she have her ex a bunch of sleeping pills so why in the hell did she not go to a shelter while he was sleeping?
I'll tell you why, it's because she's a lying murdering bitch, she wanted to get her 15 minutes of fame as a " Brave, Abused Women " who " Coragrously " struck back at her " Abuser "

I hope the famly of the murdered man shoots this murdering bitch.

[nevosopelo]

Frankly, this is unbelievable. I'm sorry, but she COULD have left the relationship; the Police have the power to remove allegedly-violent husbands from their houses, she would have had friends and relatives, and there are domestic violence shelters.

Secondly, even if the allegations are true, it doesn't justify murder. I find it remarkable, how many people don't even condone the hanging of convicted murderers, yet, whenever a woman kills a supposedly-violent husband, the same people condone it; double standards, me thinks.

Thirdly, how do we know the allegations are true? Cases like this give women who wish to kill their partners for no reason, the opportunity to do so, and then be let off by playing the 'victim' card. It doesn't take a genius to figure that any woman who murders her husband, with OR WITHOUT reason, is going to claim abuse; and then GET AWAY WITH MURDER.

This is so typical, of the feministic, female-biased world that we westerners live in.

Now let's see if they post it....

We will never know the truth because she has killed the only witness for the defence as well as her alleged abuser.

The judge and the jury are part of the conspiracy to eliminate all men who are not wanted.

NEVO

[Kargan3033]

We will never know the truth because she has killed the only witness for the defence as well as her alleged abuser.

The judge and the jury are part of the conspiracy to eliminate all men who are not wanted.

NEVO

You got that right, this is just one of many reasons why men should not marry western women, only if there was some way of getting rid of such evil people before they commit such crimes but unfortunetly we can't, some day this shit is going to end one way or another and as fars as I'm concered it can't happen soon enough

[Diogenes]

a father of three girls

what does it matter about that, it says they helped her.

[nevosopelo]

And, upon reading the article, it appears that one of the MEN, who supplied a weapon, got community service; as opposed to the ACTUAL murderess, who got nothing. Unbelievable.

There you have it!!!

In black and white.

That shows how much a man's life is worth in the family courts.

The only way to stay safe is not to get married, not living in lover, and pay cash for sex as many punters did with Andrea Dworkin.

For a while, she was a prostitute. Ricki Abrams, a feminist and fellow expatriate, sheltered Dworkin in her home, and helped her find places to stay on houseboats, a communal farm, and deserted buildings.[14] Dworkin tried to work up the money to return to the United States. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_...he_Netherlands



Only when manhood is dead - and it will perish when ravaged femininity no longer sustains it - only then will we know what it is to be free.
Andrea Dworkin

Need not to say more

NEVO

[nevosopelo]

"It seems virtual reality has now become true reality in Australia""

- dar ain't nothing virtual about it ! it is the order of the day here!

the feminit agitprop has been hammering this DV nostrum for wimyn that kill for years now that even the judges believe it

it is a bit like confessing your sins to the priest judge before you cark !
straight to the Pearly Gates and to frolick in the Elysian fields forever

no horrible men in sight ( all believers in feminitism - ie manginas)

It seems an utterly dangerous place for men down under!!!

How do they manage to procreate? via black widow spider style? (shag the male and then kill him?)

Some years ago I have applied for a visa to go to live in Australia after meeting some people from there in London. Today, I can not thank them enough for refusing my application to reside in Australia. They may well have saved my life!!!

There is one burning question though, who were the jury who found the murderess innocent of all charges because she claimed domestic violence.

I would like to put them this question, does murdering a father of three count as domestic violence?
Their message is not. It does not count. Hence, only men commit domestic violence. Women are never to be blamed, lest the wrath of hysterical feminist descend upon them.

This is a clear case of gender biased justice.

NEVO

[Celtic Druid]

The sickening reality in many such cases is that it's the woman who's actually the violent one.

What many people don't realise in a number of English-speaking countries is that provocation is legal for women but not men (UK men can thank Harriet Harman for that). Could you imagine this being a acceptable disparity between different colours of people without massive social and political upheaval being frontline news material.

Furthermore, the state is essentially giving a green light to all women to be judge, jury and executioner. This is the extreme example of how women and society agree that any (alleged)physical assault on a woman is deservest of a death penalty on the 'accused' man. Disproportionate much? A lucid example of which group is deemed the politically predominant and which is the social excrement. It's the western (feminist) version of extreme apartheid whereby you can kill a member of the lesser social group (men) and you're legally excused as they are deemed as lesser than human.

It's sickeningly ironic how striking a woman can mean an execution of a man, yet a mother butchering her children will get you hugs and tears on Oprah, extensive profit and exemption from responsibility.

If children don't get justice from women's violence does anybody genuinely believe men have a fucking chance in hell?