David Usher, on MND, has broken with his usual reserve and has penned a supportive piece about the F4J protest. He talks very positively of the cleverness of the F4J slogan. He discusses his grandma's early
feminist history and decries the use of violence. As per usual.
But this is a good step, nonetheless. His river of activity is acting in concert with F4J's. The Main is building.
My friend amfortas tried several times to post a comment but so far it hasn't appeared.
So here is what he had to say:
Quote:
I too applaud the 'smarts' of modern sloganeering as used by F4J and the verve they demonstrate selecting targets and scaling roofs. Those guys definitely know how to drag the public's tiny attention span back to the issue.
And the potted Usher history (thank you David) is revealing. The civilised urge to be peaceful and patient is commendable but as history so frequently shows us, it can also exacerbate the problem. The closest that F4J got to arousing public outrage was when Jolly sat atop a Judge's roof dressed as Father Christmas and the dull bugger Judge came out with a shotgun.
Provoking such targets as Harman to doing stupid things is the way to leverage the protest. F4J has some success there when they utilise their Court appearances and let the public ridicule the Bench.
But, the forty years (recall the Hundred year's War) demonising and fighting men shows no sign of abating. Patience might be seen as wearing thin and cautious words flow, but maybe patience was misplaced in the first instance. Few movements have lasted such a length of time without having severe and permanent affect on a society.
Our society is in danger of failing altogether. We are non-breeding our way into oblivion, due to Feminism. It is a completely destructive ideology.
Most of the MRM or Men's Equality Movement do not advocate violence. I can understand and appreciate its use though. I was employed by the Queen for 20+ years to visit violence upon her enemies. I am well aware that violence has a way of breaking out in unexpected places simply because people's tolerance limits differ. I understand that too.
Push Government Minister's limits enough and it is THEY who are likely to turn violent. Stupidly. These F4J guys get surrounded by cops under Ministerial direction and 'protection'. At the Lincoln Memorial Jolly Stansby was assaulted by cops. Armed cops. The American public are innoculated against reaction to Police violence, having turned into nightly entertainment. They accept it like innoculated sheep accept tics.
The British Feminist Government acts hysterically to 'terrorism' and like Feminists everywhere who slide the definition of 'Rape' downward to include activity no matter how un-rapelike into the frame, so the BritFemGov will likely do with sitting on a roof.
The British Police murdered an innocent Brazilian guy running for a train a year or to back. They have already pushed right up against the average man's limits. One day an F4J hero will become a martyr.
That will be the moment when previously silent men will stand up and say, "I am Spartacus". They will take to their roofs in solidarity. Some will be armed. And for some others, brooding as they have been, the dogs of violence will slip the leash. It will stimulate an over-reaction from BritFemGov. There WILL be a civil conflagration.
British men are among the most tolerant that have ever walked the earth, but like Churchill, can be bull-dogs when roused.
Will American men be allies again, in this cause of even more pressing and essential Justice? Will American men sit on the roof, with their rifles?
Will America’s leading MRM voices support this, or will they condemn the righteous revolt? |
I have tried all my life to leave the place better than I found it.
But there are 6 billion other buggers out there messing it up.
I am outnumbered.
But...
YOU don't just make a difference,
you make THE difference.
8th-June-2008
