Fathers in Britain are removed from birth certificates!

[nevosopelo]

The unthinkable is now a reality.

Baroness Ruth Deech, a former chair of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, said: “What I object to is the falsification of the birth certificate. It is supposed to be a true record of the genetic origins of birth. This is putting the rights and wishes of the parents way above those of the child. It is absurd that anyone can be named as the father or the second parent.”

It's official!!!!
Fathers are now an irrelevancy in law as women becomes the dominant factor in the birth certificate of the child.The word "father" is redundant and replaced by a more general descriptive phrase "the second parent" or in other words "the second class citizen".

Parliament has, obviously, ignored the the law that themselves introduced some years ago.
In 1991, the UK government agreed to follow the UNCRC.

The question here is this, how the government do square up the "second parent blunder" with the right of the child to his father?

They can't unless they are under the delusional belief that decision is in the best interest of the child.

They're all barmy!!!!

NEVO

[Marx]

A link would be greatly appreciated!

[nevosopelo]

Her is one link http://news.pinkpaper.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=762

and this one http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle5822053.ece

If you google it you'll find plenty more!

NEVO

[nevosopelo]

I have, just now, noticed a post made by Julie with the same theme as this post. I also noticed all the post replies she had and I didn't.

This is the kind of attitude men have towards women.

Unless and until men change this favoritism attitude towards women, No amount of ranting will change anything.

Furthermore, feminist exploits this weakness in men to their own advantage.

Men will always lose the power game because of this weakness.

NEVO

[chevalier]

Agreed. But don't take it to heart Nevo. There has in recent history been alot of male shaming here that was thinly disguised as being helpful to the men's movement.

I have noticed myself that I have been making sure I check any posts by the women here. And I think it is because I want to avoid being shamed for not being appropriately attentive to what the women have to say.

I guess I fell into that trap without even realizing it.

And you are absolutely right. That is something we have to change if the movement is going to move forward.

I am not saying women should be ignored but at the same time they should not be given extra attention just to avoid some shaming language.

[nevosopelo]

Originally Posted by chevalier

Agreed. But don't take it to heart Nevo. There has in recent history been alot of male shaming here that was thinly disguised as being helpful to the men's movement.

I have noticed myself that I have been making sure I check any posts by the women here. And I think it is because I want to avoid being shamed for not being appropriately attentive to what the women have to say.

I guess I fell into that trap without even realizing it.

And you are absolutely right. That is something we have to change if the movement is going to move forward.

I am not saying women should be ignored but at the same time they should not be given extra attention just to avoid some shaming language.

Too right!!
Men must stop being meek as a lamb every time they come accross a pussy!!!

NEVO

[nevosopelo]

Originally Posted by TERA

I think this is a good thing....I mean, if you donated sperm to a sperm bank, and some random woman had an IVF treatment and it happened to be your sperm that was used, would you necessarily want to be named as the father and have all the financial responsibilities that come with that?

Besides, the person that's put on the certificate is one that has consented (and been counseled) beforehand, one who has agreed to take on the responsibilities of being a legal guardian.

I do think that people who donate sperm should also be counseled beforehand, so that they understand that they may not be named on the birth certificates of those who might possibly end up using their sperm in IVF treatments. And, I think that a record of medical history should be obtained from the donor and preserved for the future child(children). If men don't like the situation, they probably ought not donate their sperm.

The answer to your first question is an absolute "NO".
I do not believe I have the right to cheat a child of his true identity.

On your second paragraph my opinion is based on the same principle and believe that is an act of utter selfishness to squirt a seed and then vanish in the fog.

NEVO

[Marx]

They will find a minority issue and promote that as the main issue, when the real agenda is quite clear.

There is no denying that feminism has been trying to detach fathers from children and the home for a very long time.

This is just another stepping stone for them.

[RedRooster]

I am now truly convinced that some virile psychosis attaches itself to the corpuscle of ones mind when effectively put into positions of political power.

All reason must escape the mind in a cloud of everlasting delusion.

The sickness remains.

Inundating all.

[Kim]

Originally Posted by nevosopelo

It's official!!!!
Fathers are now an irrelevancy in law as women becomes the dominant factor in the birth certificate of the child.The word "father" is redundant and replaced by a more general descriptive phrase "the second parent" or in other words "the second class citizen".

Unbelievable.

Originally Posted by nevosopelo

The question here is this, how the government do square up the "second parent blunder" with the right of the child to his father?

They can't unless they are under the delusional belief that decision is in the best interest of the child.

Untold travesties have been committed in family courts....all in the "best interest of the child", of course.

[nevosopelo]

Originally Posted by Kim

[/color]

Unbelievable.



Untold travesties have been committed in family courts....all in the "best interest of the child", of course.

Here in NAZI Britain those travesties are a foregone conclusion in the Familie courts. The Law of supporting evidence to the facts do not apply. It all follows an already well trodden path which in the end dispossesses the father of everything that he has worked for all his life.

NEVO

[outdoors]

Here in NAZI Britain those travesties are a foregone conclusion in the Familie courts. The Law of supporting evidence to the facts do not apply. It all follows an already well trodden path which in the end dispossesses the father of everything that he has worked for all his life.

NEVO

Canada is no differen't!

....and here-if u do attempt to push her off the path...you will be accused of controlling and abusive behavior--it doesn't matter wtf you do..they have special feminazi father assassins that can take and spin every little thing to suit their,"expert" opinion.The whole system is geared to extorting the father for every nickel--and they use your children as hostage.

[encryption1]

This has been happening for years. This is nothing new in a long line of injustices men and their children have faced.

[Percy]

I have, just now, noticed a post made by Julie with the same theme as this post. I also noticed all the post replies she had and I didn't.

This is the kind of attitude men have towards women.

First in maybe, Novo?

[Daveyone]

You could always strike at the heart of the establishment by bombarding the following site with your views and opinions;
http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=fo24532

and do the right thing here;
http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/please-go/#detail

Happy misandering y'all