Thread: Australian Parliament Rolls Back Children’s Rights to Their Dad

Quote from Zuberi

Article here. Excerpt:
'The long-anticipated roll-back of children’s rights in Australia has happened. The Australian Parliament has passed the bill aimed at scuttling the 2006 amendments to the Family Law Act that promised children greater access to their fathers. The Howard government’s modest attempt at making shared parenting the rule in Australia was met with a firestorm of protest from anti-father forces across the country.

It's a start!

A start?

How?

Under the new law in Australia, virtually any action by a father that a mother dislikes, or claims to dislike, will be held to constitute domestic violence. That will set him up for the loss of his kids. Essentially, all a mother has to do is convince a court that she had been made fearful by her children’s father for him to be swept out of their lives. Just to make certain that courts don’t discourage the practice, there’s no punishment allowed in the law for false swearing.
Claims of abuse are, then, a free shot. Anyone can make them based on anything or nothing. If it’s proven that they were fabricated, there’s nothing anyone can do. The certain result will be a family court system inundated by claims of abuse, few of which can be objectively verified. Any family attorney who fails to use even the most trivial infractions against a parent will not be doing his/her job.
So when courts hear evidence of domestic violence, it can be anything from the most savage assaults to “emotional manipulation” or “financial abuse.” If the beloved family family dog is terminally ill and in constant pain, Dad, best not take her to the vet to have her euthanized. If you commit that act of mercy, you can lose your kids under the new law.
Does Dad want sex too much? He’s an abuser. Does he want it too little? Ditto.
Opposition members were clear in their criticisms of the new law, calling it “fundamentally flawed” and saying it “tips the scale back towards hell.” But they weren’t enough to keep the bill from becoming law.

I think you misunderstood the article, Zuberi. This bill actually threw shared parenting out of the windowing because of a single (or a few at best) singled out instances of bad fathers.

It's a start of an accelerated detoriation of father's rights. At first, things were simply somewhat skewed and the law was simply executed in a biassed manner. Now, the law is inherently biassed itself.

From an international perspective its interesting to note that the Family Law Review in the UK met a similar fate. Internatilnal feminism at work no doubt

There is a growing row about a family Court decision just last week. A Judge ruled that a father may not see his little daughter again until she is 18.

The father had not done anything wrong - and the Judge acknowledged that - but the mother had made it clear that she would continue as she had done in ruining the relationship if he had any contact.

The Judge should have jailed her but instead gave into her and banned the father.

Australia is going backwards under Gloriana Julia the feminist harpy PM.

This is happening now, in the same week as a woman was given several years jail for 'ostracising' one of her children and starving her. It took an 'Uncle' to 'steal' her from the house and take her to a hospital.

There is no reason and consistency in Oz law. The authorities are all completely lunatic.

Quote from Percy

There is a growing row about a family Court decision just last week. A Judge ruled that a father may not see his little daughter again until she is 18.

What a disgraceful decision !!! The judge should be "Horse whipped !!"

Quote from Richard

Internatilnal feminism at work no doubt

The illuminati at work !! Do you seriously believe that a group of "Bra burning women" could yeild such awesome power ?

Many of the top judges are "Freemasons" freemasonry is a Luciferian religion, just join the dots.

Clearly the australian government is outdoing the UK. in beating fathers into oblivion!!!
But you know what?
Children are, by far, a smarter lot than those assinine rulings of governments and judges, eventually as they grow older they see the injustice in all this abusive laws.
Children will demand to see their fathers on their own rights!!
It is already happening in the UK. Children turning against their own mothers is already a fact of life, no matter how much denial and cover up of the truth is in place.
Fathers must encourage children to defend their rights!!!

NEVO

It is important to recognise these enactments as deliberate. This is not some kind of misplaced ignorance at work, it is malevolence and it is fully intentional. The creatures of the state - from politicians, judges and lawyers downwards, through all the tiers of the machine - are well aware of the disastrous effect of fatherlessness. But they are perfectly happy for the bias and the evils of their system to continue to pour out a continuing stream of unfathered children. The resulting dysfunctional families, delinquent young people, crime-ridden societies, women welded to the welfare teat and men trapped in various stages of the legal carousel with a jail cell waiting for any that fall off, gives them all the excuse they need to continue the great lie, to present themselves as the saviours of abused victims, to secure massive funding for themselves, and to keep themselves in perpetual jobs.

It won't end until people wake up to what is being done in their name and either break the system into pieces for good, or refuse to have any part of it. The latter starts with men refusing to get married, by the way; and, sadly but inevitably, not having children - at least not until they have secured the future welfare of those children, which will never arise from anything that the state will have to offer.

I know it is a pipe dream to expect such a thing to happen, but wouldn't it be something if it ever did? Imagine men everywhere refusing to father children with women unless those women could provide absolute proof that they will not use the system that has been set up for them to destroy the fathers of those children. How would women provide such proof? Sorry, but that would be their problem. Women have created this mess by abusing the law and their own children, and it is their politicians, not ours, who are perpetuating the evil; so they have to accept responsibility for clearing up their mess. If they want children, they will have to figure out a way to prove that they will not break the father-child bond to the satisfaction of the father. If they want it badly enough, they will find a way. Otherwise, men should not touch them with a ten-foot barge pole. Abusive women have to be prevented from ever having children. If we are not allowed to sterilise them, we can do the next best thing: boycott them, marginalise them, don't let them attach themselves to any man. If they can't get our sperm, they can't have children and they will have no avenue to practice their abuse - and the father-crushing machine will have no oil to run on. And children who don't come into existence will be spared the misery those abusive women and their cronies within the system would otherwise inflict on them.

It won't happen on a general basis of course, but this is the way that the MGTOW philosophy works by providing an escape for anyone bold enough to use it - each individual man can make the choice to demand this requirement from any woman who wants children with him. So it can certainly happen at an individual level. You actually have this power already, guys. You just need the nerve to use it. Looks to me like it is high time a lot more men did so.

Quote from paul parmenter

It is important to recognise these enactments as deliberate. This is not some kind of misplaced ignorance at work, it is malevolence and it is fully intentional.

Spot-on !!!

An evil (satanic) force at work !!!

Quote from Nynrah Ghost

I think you misunderstood the article, Zuberi. This bill actually threw shared parenting out of the windowing because of a single (or a few at best) singled out instances of bad fathers.

It's a start of an accelerated detoriation of father's rights. At first, things were simply somewhat skewed and the law was simply executed in a biassed manner. Now, the law is inherently biassed itself.

My mistake, I was posting two articles.

Stronger protection on family violence | News.com.au

The bill that they've passed is blatantly anti father and anti child. Check the link.

This is just the beginning of a new era of demonizing fathers so the mothers will attach themselves to the state. The situation is disturbing on so many levels, most importantly the children will lack proper male role models and become a burden on the state when they act out or get involved in mischief and then crime. I don't know if these judges and law makers see the harm they are causing future generations, nor I doubt they care. As long as they appeal to the feminists, this behavior and set of actions will continue until the great backlash happens. It's won't be pretty when legions of men rise up and take back control of their destiny, their children's destiny, and the destiny of mankind in the west.

It seems that western governments are lurching and crawling to the abyss, and for some reason, they don't see nor care that they are bringing destruction upon themselves and others.

I pity the generations that will have to deal with the aftermath, my son's included. What is so depressing is that my generation and those that went before me have not made the world into a better place for our children, instead through avarice, hatred, gender bias and bigotry, we have created a perfect disutopian future.

Anyone with a room temperature I.Q. and above can see the series of events now unfolding that threaten the very core of our humanity. Children need Fathers. I's a built in feature of Homo Sapiens. It's how we as a species have managed to survive since Homo Erectus.

Perhaps the morons in power are trying to lower the planets population At the rate we are procreating, we will outstrip the planets ability to support us. So the obvious solutions of leaving for a new home amongst the stars or decrease the population pressure on the planets resources are the 2 solutions at the governments disposal. Unfortunately building colony ships is at least 100 years away at this point in time.

Quote from Zuberi

My mistake, I was posting two articles.

Stronger protection on family violence | News.com.au

The bill that they've passed is blatantly anti father and anti child. Check the link.

WTF is this world coming to?

Where are the Aussie men?

Why are they not saying anything and rioting in the streets?

{Note to Aussie males}--your silence is important-FEMINIST"S DEMAND IT!

So what's next?

Men will have to masturbate into a jar to have a woman inseminated?

Obviously sex with women will be the next thing that will be outlawed.

Artificial insemination only as sex will be allocated as violence against women.

This is one f'd up situation the Aussie's males are in.

the first sally the feminits succeded In Australia with was back in 1972 when the Labour Government ( clandestine communists) introduced single mothers pensions; tis shafted the nuclear family, but good !!!!

now the state was the provider of last resort not daddy ( er partner person);

then the Family Law Act converted men into harassers and abusers by definition so now in the main street of my town a sign has been erected that Domestic Violence will not be tolerated with telephone numbers to report the abusers ( by implication men);

I have been steadily educating my son about the local gynocracy within which he lives and pointing out the awful pitfall of delusions of love and romance with the new age gals brought up to believe young men are likely dupes; forewarned is for armed