Thread: Woman denies false rape claim against police recruit

Past sexual stuff doesn't really prove anything, but the fact that she has another guy accused of rape and that she gave him oral sex... I mean, if I try to think like a guy that forces himself on a woman... I'd avoid any place that has teeth, right?

Not sure about NZ, but here in the good ole US of A, rape shield laws gag the procecutor from bringing up this "alledged" previous rape...

He would be hard pressed to show her as a habitual accuser....

TMOTS

Past sexual stuff doesn't really prove anything.... RV

Does this sort of 'stuff' just come unbidden to your fingertips, RV?

It doesn't have to 'prove'. But is is nevertheless relevant.

Chaste sexual 'stuff' between a couple is one thing, but sexual promiscuity is quite another. Add sexually explicit 'stuff' over the internet as well and a 'character' emerges. Character supports a defence and also, for fairness, should be used as circumstantial evidence.

This 'past sexual stuff' not to be considered ploy is just part of the Pussy-Pass Rape-Sheild rules designed to give an easy ride to women accusers.

Quote from themanonthestreet

Not sure about NZ, but here in the good ole US of A, rape shield laws gag the procecutor from bringing up this "alledged" previous rape...

He would be hard pressed to show her as a habitual accuser....

TMOTS

It was the same in NZ until about half way through last year.

One of the rape activists took cops to court for rape but the cops got off. At least one cop who got off was already in prison on another rape charge at the time.

So Helen Clarke (rad fem and Prime Minister at the time) changed the law so you could bring forward past charges.

I guess as the old saying goes, "What is good for the goose is good for the gander"

So if the man is sexually promiscuous too, the chances are higher that he will rape because it shows that he can't control himself and needs sex? If he is in a video on the internet in which he degrades a woman he should be convicted? I'm just saying because if a woman is sexually promiscuous that doesn't mean that she can't get raped. And I don't agree with the way the current laws are. If she sued 15 other guys before for rape, it should be trial evidence. And I don't believe in not being able to consent due to booze, unless the victim is passed out. There are a lot of complex issues related to this, but it's disgusting to see that feminists want to get done with innocent until proven guilty just because rape convictions are low.

And if I get raped, I won't sue the guy. Rapists get light sentences here so it's not worth it. For his first felony of this type he'd get 7 years minimum with parole in 2-3 years. But I'll make sure he never walks again.

Quote from RebelliousVanilla

So if the man is sexually promiscuous too, the chances are higher that he will rape because it shows that he can't control himself and needs sex? If he is in a video on the internet in which he degrades a woman he should be convicted? I'm just saying because if a woman is sexually promiscuous that doesn't mean that she can't get raped. And I don't agree with the way the current laws are. If she sued 15 other guys before for rape, it should be trial evidence. And I don't believe in not being able to consent due to booze, unless the victim is passed out. There are a lot of complex issues related to this, but it's disgusting to see that feminists want to get done with innocent until proven guilty just because rape convictions are low.

And if I get raped, I won't sue the guy. Rapists get light sentences here so it's not worth it. For his first felony of this type he'd get 7 years minimum with parole in 2-3 years. But I'll make sure he never walks again.

I hear all that you are saying RV.

No-one agrees with rape here. This has become a very hot topic and needs to be pushed in favour of men because in NZ 85% of rape claims are false. The feminists don't disagree with this but they are still pushing for women to get an easier time in court because the International feminist movement is pushing for it.

NZ prisons are busting at the seams with men on false rape charges and something has to be done about it.

How would it feel for you to be in prison for 8 years for something you never did just on the word of a man?

We also have immigration laws that are tough but if you are a female and say a man raped you, you get instant citizenship. Honestly RV, women around the world are telling each other how easy NZ is to get into.

It is really unfair.

Also RV, in NZ you get $10,000 if you have been raped.

We have a male childcare worker in prison who won't accept parole because he is innocent. And the government won't pardon him even though 95% of the population knows he is innocent. The feminists who put him in prison are now politicians themselves.

He apparently raped over 100 little children. Most didn't even go to the childcare centre nor live in the same town. But each family got $10,000 and some families got $40,000 because they say he raped their child 4 times.

This was 15 years ago and back then this was a hell of a lot of money.

julie, I disagree with citizenship awards and so on just because you were a victim. Or with getting money. Actually I believe that if a guy can prove that she is lying she should be liable financially towards him and also go to jail for prejury.

And I don't favour this guilty until proven innocent issue that feminists are pushing for because it's fucked up. As long as she doesn't have solid evidence that she was raped(GHB in her blood, lacerations, bruises, the proper psychological behaviour, his skin under her nails) I don't see why a man should be convicted. I agree with only one kind of sexual activities being brought in court - the ones that happened in between the alleged rape and the rape kit exam.

If I recall correctly, according to democratic principles, they'd rather let a criminal be free than incarcerate an honest person.

Quote from RebelliousVanilla

julie, I disagree with citizenship awards and so on just because you were a victim. Or with getting money. Actually I believe that if a guy can prove that she is lying she should be liable financially towards him and also go to jail for prejury.

And I don't favour this guilty until proven innocent issue that feminists are pushing for because it's fucked up. As long as she doesn't have solid evidence that she was raped(GHB in her blood, lacerations, bruises, the proper psychological behaviour, his skin under her nails) I don't see why a man should be convicted. I agree with only one kind of sexual activities being brought in court - the ones that happened in between the alleged rape and the rape kit exam.

If I recall correctly, according to democratic principles, they'd rather let a criminal be free than incarcerate an honest person.

You know, I am proud of you. Sounds silly I know because I am not related to you but just for the fact you are a woman who can think for herself. You remind me so much of me although I took the wrong roads.

And you better stay on track to where you are going, else I will be kicking your backside.

What you are is not well liked by some but loved by others. You are a very special young lady. Never let anyone hold you back. And if it gets to much for you out there, remember you have friends here.

Oh, and don't let your study fall back on the gender war.

As long as she doesn't have solid evidence that she was raped(GHB in her blood, lacerations, bruises, the proper psychological behaviour, his skin under her nails) I don't see why a man should be convicted. I agree with only one kind of sexual activities being brought in court - the ones that happened in between the alleged rape and the rape kit exam.

Apart from the GHB,the other is a normal sexual behaviour for many people,some even pay for this,what did you say, your 18,what a sheltered life you lead.

Quote from senach

As long as she doesn't have solid evidence that she was raped(GHB in her blood, lacerations, bruises, the proper psychological behaviour, his skin under her nails) I don't see why a man should be convicted. I agree with only one kind of sexual activities being brought in court - the ones that happened in between the alleged rape and the rape kit exam.

Apart from the GHB,the other is a normal sexual behaviour for many people,some even pay for this,what did you say, your 18,what a sheltered life you lead.

I think you have a good point. Serious rape should put a man in prison.

And being the woman supporter I am I will tell you why.

Our women today just like me have missed out on the best of 2 worlds.

I was a witness to my girlfriend being raped. I was a figure skater at a very rough skating ring. At the time the hockey team was about shedding blood to win.

But being the girl who didn't like sex let alone kissing a guy but loved to take risks, I was quite popular. (probably being attractive didn't hurt)

But my girlfriends were all into kissing guys and drinking alcohol and having sex. Maybe they did it for 'the love feeling'. After all, they say "women have sex for love and men love to have sex".

But anyhow, I was on the ice that night and I saw 2 hockey players walk my girlfriend into the hockey changerooms. I don't even know what made me get off the ice and run to the door protesting.

One guy went in with her and the other guy stood at the door and said to me, "She asked for it Julie". But my girlfriend did not complain nor say anything to me.

We had no fathers. That is what made us all friends and there were heaps of us even hundreds of us, all hanging together in our own little gangs and our gangs befriended other gangs. All lost to the world. Some had fathers who worked long hours which made them fatherless in their own way and some had fathers who came back from the war but had lost their minds.

My point of all this is that we could have it all, TODAY. We could have protective fathers and we could have the education that TV provides and school provides and radio and newspapers.

If it wasn't for feminism, we could all understand the consequences of our behaviour. How men and women think.

The only truth we get today is about animals. Everything about humans is about ideology. Man and woman made up bull.

Quote from senach

As long as she doesn't have solid evidence that she was raped(GHB in her blood, lacerations, bruises, the proper psychological behaviour, his skin under her nails) I don't see why a man should be convicted. I agree with only one kind of sexual activities being brought in court - the ones that happened in between the alleged rape and the rape kit exam.

Apart from the GHB,the other is a normal sexual behaviour for many people,some even pay for this,what did you say, your 18,what a sheltered life you lead.

Let's say that I had a bunch of unorthodox sexual experiences and never in my life did I get lacerations, bruises, scratched the guy and acted like a traumatised person for a while afterwards, all in the same time or a combination of these.

And don't talk to me about sheltered lives because you have no idea of the things I experienced. If I don't take out my issues on others like a lot of people do and if I don't write on this forum about them to beg for sympathy, it doesn't mean I lived a sheltered life.

julie, around 17 years old I quit giving a damn about what others think, unless they earn respect and validate their opinions. And I created this label - lazy underachiever - for those people who have plenty of potential and yet fall short. I hope I won't use it for myself too.

I hate these guys that say these words... "She asked for it." I hope that's what the people in jail will tell to them... "You asked for it." They make me think of unpleasant things...

Quote from RebelliousVanilla

Let's say that I had a bunch of unorthodox sexual experiences and never in my life did I get lacerations, bruises, scratched the guy and acted like a traumatised person for a while afterwards, all in the same time or a combination of these.

RV, are you saying you are damaged and you can't be a someone in society? Are you saying that you have to be one sided?

I hate these guys that say these words... "She asked for it." I hope that's what the people in jail will tell to them... "You asked for it." They make me think of unpleasant things..

Jail is stupid for the most people.

Do you know why they said, "She asked for it?"

I mean, .. did you ever ask them? If you are going to represent people in Government don't you think you should understand them? Even your enemies?

I take it that this is in response to my post, RV.

Quote from RebelliousVanilla

So if the man is sexually promiscuous too, the chances are higher that he will rape because it shows that he can't control himself and needs sex?

Not necessarily so. But it might. It goes to history and pattern and should be considered by a Jury.

If he is in a video on the internet in which he degrades a woman he should be convicted?

Not on that basis alone. Again, circumstantial evidence does not 'prove' in any individual item, but are additive and dependant on quality.

I'm just saying because if a woman is sexually promiscuous that doesn't mean that she can't get raped.

Of course. I am not argueing otherwise.

And I don't agree with the way the current laws are. If she sued 15 other guys before for rape, it should be trial evidence.

Is this an arbitrary number? How about twice before?

And I don't believe in not being able to consent due to booze, unless the victim is passed out. There are a lot of complex issues related to this, but it's disgusting to see that feminists want to get done with innocent until proven guilty just because rape convictions are low.

We are on the same page, here.

And if I get raped, I won't sue the guy. Rapists get light sentences here so it's not worth it. For his first felony of this type he'd get 7 years minimum with parole in 2-3 years. But I'll make sure he never walks again.

7 years is a long time in jail and for some men a sentence to be raped themselves.

I had close contact with two women where one (the daughter) accused her boyfriend of rape and he got two years jail. It was not anywhere near Rape, but both she and her mother were delghted to see him suffer. Up to that point he had been a model of friendliness and affection to both. His life was ruined. Her life seemed to be getting along well with no adverse quality at all. His 'Rape' of her was identical to all the previous two years of their sexual relationship ie: he initiated and she was compliant, then changed her mind next day claiming she was about to break off the relationship (he was expected to be a mind-reader).

You may want him to 'never walk again', but will you be walking? Is this not two eyes for an eye.?