Thread: Vigilante fear over internet 'pervert site'

""South Ribble MP David Borrow also believes the site could lead to cases of mistaken identity, as it contains details of people who have been charged with offences but not convicted – or otherwise – by a court.""

with the nation of willing and able wimyn liars out there and the men they lied agin charged and exonerated this could result in some disaster
for innocent men

Possibly links with this article, also from Lancashire.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/m...er/8523103.stm

"A father has spoken of his ordeal after being wrongly named as a paedophile on Facebook by a disgruntled neighbour".

"If you think they have published details of someone who has been charged, but not convicted, and they have been falsely accused, we have got someone labelled as a sex offender who has never been convicted.

Cue the moron lynch mob.

"The point is that a vigilante who decides to take the law into his or her own hands, is a criminal, and equally deserves to be on our website," the spokesman added.

There is a 'social contract' between the Man in the Street and the Authorities that he is assumed to have authorised.

There is an expectation that those Authorities will act on his behalf, investigating untoward activities that the Man in the Street finds offensive or damaging, finding evidence, bringing charges against those that offend or damage, extracting a Just compensation and applying a sound punishment that deters others.

But the Authorities consistently prove themselves incompetent in all aspects of their authorised and demanded roles.

Of course a Vigilante is a criminal, because vigilantism is defined as criminal in exchange for the Man in the Street NOT acting on his own behalf. But it is the last resort for the Man in the Street when the Authorities consistently fail to discharge their duties - duties for which the Man in the Street pays through the nose.

When the Authorities fail to act on his behalf, he has a DUTY to take action himself.

He also has a duty to do all the functions of the roles and be right.

Folks,
One thing you have to realise about these vigilante groups is this:

They are never happy until they have their "man"

They will go to any extreme if it means that the subject is "taken down"

They will break the law at an instant, but deny they did, in the name of getting a risk to society "off the streets".

In 2006, there was a guy here that was accused of "indecent assualt" against a boy and a girl (twins) aged 15 at the time.
The trial found the guy guilty, he served 3 years in prison.
After he got out, there was a determined local/media campaign to "out" this guy.
That said, some clown let his name and address out.
He was based here where I am, the ensuing vigilante groups (namely Womens Refuse, ChildHelpNZ, Salvation Army), all banded together to get this guy out of town.

They tried to set fire to his house twice, they broke his windows (which never got fixed because of the area he was posted to).

In the end, some mangina bastard, shot him dead, with a .243 rifle.

NOW, you try and tell me who is worse here??

It turned out that the twins lied, this came out after the guy's funeral.

Hang your head in SHAME you knee-jerk fuck-wits.

sam,
Don't be too silly.
I shielded this guy when we moved him out of his place after it "caught fire" the second time.
I had bruises all over my back from bottles thrown at the guy, 3 struck my fire-helmet.
All the while there were chants of "Kiddie-f**ker!!" and "POS, we'll kill you!!"
Isn't it nice how so-called "caring" organisations can rally up a crew of nasty femi-nazi wimmin in a short period of time.
Yet it takes them an hour or two to get any relief to us us firemen at a large incident.
All we want is a bite to eat and a cup of tea aftyer doing really hard work.

I can imagine why vigilante is performed in some cases... but when it comes to cases like sexual misconduct accusation it can't be tolerated, why? Because it is too likely an accuser is a liar. Roughly half the reported rapes are false accusations (and that bars out wrong convictions) and thus it is easy to say that vigilante attacks have a HUGE risk of being dropdead wrong as well, yet the accuser and the vigilante will never pay a proper price for their criminal acts.

That was a terrible story Mike, and thank God YOU were around to lend a hand. I could think of no better man to have on my side.

Lest you think I approve of mindless mobs - I do not.

As I said, when a man decides that the Authorities are no longer acting on his behalf, "He (also) has a duty to do all the functions of the roles and be right."

Mindless mobs generally do not and aren't.

there was a lynch mob after the Lacrosse students too and were motivated er inspired by the wimyn liar;

with wimyn lying is just part of their psychological make up ad I believe they believe their own lies

Quote from MikeT

In 2006, there was a guy here that was accused of "indecent assualt" against a boy and a girl (twins) aged 15 at the time.
The trial found the guy guilty, he served 3 years in prison.
After he got out, there was a determined local/media campaign to "out" this guy.

In a trial the overwhelming data shows a jury will find a guilty plea the most when the victim is a girl (and the least when the victim is a man).

Often when a charge of sexual improriety by a man against a girl is made, hysteria and feelings replace facts and rationale unfortunately.

That said, some clown let his name and address out.
He was based here where I am, the ensuing vigilante groups (namely Womens Refuse, ChildHelpNZ, Salvation Army), all banded together to get this guy out of town.

I wonder if these heavily feminist dominated organisations adopt the same approach when a woman does similar?

Shouldn't there be some rules about established charities engaging in this medieval practise and subsequent punishment when they do?

It turned out that the twins lied, this came out after the guy's funeral.

Hang your head in SHAME you knee-jerk fuck-wits.

I hear you Mike.

I'm guessing no legal action was taken against these evil twins nor a public apology by these groups?

I've seen some of the worst miscarriages of justice carried out by vigilante groups, which usually consists of unthinking cretins, easily swayed by shrieking women whipping up a frenzy, inciting and shaming the men to do their unqualified bidding.

This crap has been going on for many millennia and it highlights how stupid and pliable humans are collectively, how they so quickly revert to animalistic behaviour under any feeble pretence.

I've seen some of the worst miscarriages of justice carried out by vigilante groups, which usually consists of unthinking cretins, easily swayed by shrieking women whipping up a frenzy, inciting and shaming the men to do their unqualified bidding.

This crap has been going on for many millennia and it highlights how stupid and pliable humans are collectively, how they so quickly revert to animalistic behaviour under any feeble pretence.

I've brought this issue up in the past, speaking of mobs and vigilante justice. A large part of it is entwined with women, and perceived crimes against them; men of course have a natural urge to protect women even exceeding their desire to protect themselves, children and other men, and this can often lead to horrible ends when it is exploited in a ruthless fashion. Looking at the era of 'lynchings,' in America will provide a sobering demonstration of this run-away attitude as the more one absorbs themselves into the study of individual events the more one becomes aware of just how often these examples of 'justice' were served on behalf of women, many of whom lied simply to exercise power. There need to be most serious penalties in place for women who exploit this phenomena. It is arguably too late though, since so much of this instinct has become enshrined policy and our entire criminal justice system has become a many tiered system discriminating on the basis of sex, race, income, etc. News, media and culture have absorbed the same warped attitude; all needs to be uprooted and begun again from scratch.

Quote from dad_savage

I've brought this issue up in the past, speaking of mobs and vigilante justice. A large part of it is entwined with women, and perceived crimes against them; men of course have a natural urge to protect women even exceeding their desire to protect themselves, children and other men, and this can often lead to horrible ends when it is exploited in a ruthless fashion. Looking at the era of 'lynchings,' in America will provide a sobering demonstration of this run-away attitude as the more one absorbs themselves into the study of individual events the more one becomes aware of just how often these examples of 'justice' were served on behalf of women, many of whom lied simply to exercise power. There need to be most serious penalties in place for women who exploit this phenomena. It is arguably too late though, since so much of this instinct has become enshrined policy and our entire criminal justice system has become a many tiered system discriminating on the basis of sex, race, income, etc. News, media and culture have absorbed the same warped attitude; all needs to be uprooted and begun again from scratch.

Justice and democracy is always best served by good fellows like you despite your (and mine) eccentricities to the contrary. We progress positively whatever our obstacles.

That's another word the men's movement must dispel if ever we are to progress, the idea of FEAR and all it's ramifications.

""It is arguably too late though, since so much of this instinct has become enshrined policy and our entire criminal justice system has become a many tiered system discriminating on the basis of sex, race, income, etc""

the sex based discrimination is the energy driving the Family Court star chamber system; isn't justice such a pliable word nowadays

When change in the world is seemingly right We are here.