This woman should be sent to prison for a very long time...

False spousal rape allegation - a very typical example and for sure, not a single case in feminist countries like USA, UK...

No word about what will happen now with this woman? I guess nothing will happen, just continuing her new life with her new lover?

This case shows, a man is truly without any protection regarding false rape allegations, even if he is married, has the best intention and has children.

Solution: No marriage, no children - feminists want it like that...

I wonder, what this man is thinking about women sleeping over the first night after his release...

Interesting link in the comments:

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/

Quote from yohan

Interesting link in the comments:

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/

Thanks for pointing out the link, Yohan.

From the site:
Objectively verifiable data suggests that at least 9 percent and probably closer to half of all rape claims are false. Yet the crime of making a false rape report has become so embroiled in the feminist sexual assault milieu that it has been largely, and improperly, removed from the public discourse about rape. Sexual assault counselors often disingenuously refer to false accusations as a "myth."

"This was a big deal," Cook said. "The DNA evidence was pretty tough to get around for the prosecutor."

Get around? GET AROUND ?

It not the prosecutor's job to 'get around' the truth, but to find the damned truth and present it. They have the full weight of police departments and forensic scientists to FIND the truth.

This attitude, shared by most in the legal profession, is a source of the ROT which besets our INjustice system. The sheer cavalier attitude that everyone in the system has toward truth is a societal sickness.

Quote from Percy

Get around? GET AROUND ?

It not the prosecutor's job to 'get around' the truth, but to find the damned truth and present it. They have the full weight of police departments and forensic scientists to FIND the truth.

This attitude, shared by most in the legal profession, is a source of the ROT which besets our INjustice system. The sheer cavalier attitude that everyone in the system has toward truth is a societal sickness.

Evidently, truth stands in the way of the system's agenda.

"So you would have lied to the jury then?" Lipinski asked the alleged victim.





but the prosecutors sweat on and work their sweet butts off to pay every lie she false swore to fit him with the feminist gaol time




"Probably so," the woman replied. - she admits what a malicious liar she is

Quote from Percy

Get around? GET AROUND ?

It not the prosecutor's job to 'get around' the truth, but to find the damned truth and present it. They have the full weight of police departments and forensic scientists to FIND the truth.

This attitude, shared by most in the legal profession, is a source of the ROT which besets our INjustice system. The sheer cavalier attitude that everyone in the system has toward truth is a societal sickness.

The Injustice System has not been about truth or justice, not about crime and punishment for many decades. The Injustice System is about finding excuses to destroy as many men as it can. The Persecutors don't care about truth, or justice. That's not their jobs. They are like the SS Gestapo, their job is to round up men and send them to Auschwitz, Folsom, Attica, or some other hellhole concentration camp.

Men need to get over the myth that the Injustice System is on the side of the people.

Blessings

Bob

This week, prosecutors dropped two rape charges against Harden, 32, saying the state had "no hope" of securing a conviction against him given the "depth and breadth" of false testimony from Harden's wife, who first sought rape charges in 2005. Another rape charge was added in 2006.

What kinda crap is that? It almost sounds like the prosecutor was disappointed charges had to be dropped.

Why did he not say 'DNA proved we had the wrong person', 'the accuser is a liar', 'this was a miscarriage of justice' and in light these charges have no 'foundation'and we apologize for what the falsely accused had to go through?

Why no mention of charging her? If she is not being charged, why not? False allegations, his life has been hell and his reputation is ruined. Even after being cleared some still believe 'he did it'. What a bitch she is and the prosecutor for letting her get away with this.

yet this bitch will more than likely get custody of the 3 kids and he will have to make extortion payments whereas the kids should reside with the father who was wrongly accused but since she is not facing charges or anything 'technically' it will have no bearing for custody of the kids.

Man oh man society is really fecked up..and only going to get worse for men.

I do not approve of people killing their spouses but in the last 7 years from what I have seen and experienced myself I can in all honesty see why some men snap...men are up against a wall right off the bat, courts favour women and the man is always looked at as the bad guy....

Quote from Wallet

What kinda crap is that? It almost sounds like the prosecutor was disappointed charges had to be dropped.

Why did he not say 'DNA proved we had the wrong person', 'the accuser is a liar', 'this was a miscarriage of justice' and in light these charges have no 'foundation'and we apologize for what the falsely accused had to go through?

Why no mention of charging her? If she is not being charged, why not? False allegations, his life has been hell and his reputation is ruined. Even after being cleared some still believe 'he did it'. What a bitch she is and the prosecutor for letting her get away with this.

yet this bitch will more than likely get custody of the 3 kids and he will have to make extortion payments whereas the kids should reside with the father who was wrongly accused but since she is not facing charges or anything 'technically' it will have no bearing for custody of the kids.

Man oh man society is really fecked up..and only going to get worse for men.

I do not approve of people killing their spouses but in the last 7 years from what I have seen and experienced myself I can in all honesty see why some men snap...men are up against a wall right off the bat, courts favour women and the man is always looked at as the bad guy....

It may be time to rethink your basic beliefs there Wallet. The "bad guy" in this case is clearly the Persecutors and pigs.

The lies they have told us all our lives about "men --> bad guy" But I've come to question the standard lie. Men are sometimes violent, and I don't call that "bad" any more. What I now call "bad" are the lying scum who work to destroy good men like the pigs and persecutors in this case.

Blessings

Bob

It may be time to rethink your basic beliefs there Wallet. The "bad guy" in this case is clearly the Persecutors and pigs.

I agree but is there any mechanism to prosecute or sue civilly for what they have done? Has it been done?

I know the prosecutor in the Duke rape case lie got in some trouble but other than that does it happen?

I think it should. They should not be immune...

They should go after the DA, because if his word is tainted in rape cases, it can be used in the next rape case.

Same goes with cops. Repeat history of false rape claim support and prosecution for political gains.

the prosecution attitude begged the issue that the husband was guilty

this is the position the Star Chambers in the USSR took

it looked for all the good reasons for the politically incorrect to be sent to 30 years or more in a salt mine or the frozen tundra sawing timber

but it looked for these reasons before the theatrical trial

once the accused entered the chamber he knew his fate was sealed

what he just didn't know was it 30 years 40 years or for his natural

in America the divorce rate is average 50% I take it that butthead pays peonage to his succubus at a rate of 99%

the horrible thing is - he expects to !!!!!!

Quote from shaazam

the prosecution attitude begged the issue that the husband was guilty

this is the position the Star Chambers in the USSR took

it looked for all the good reasons for the politically incorrect to be sent to 30 years or more in a salt mine or the frozen tundra sawing timber

but it looked for these reasons before the theatrical trial

once the accused entered the chamber he knew his fate was sealed

what he just didn't know was it 30 years 40 years or for his natural

in America the divorce rate is average 50% I take it that butthead pays peonage to his succubus at a rate of 99%

the horrible thing is - he expects to !!!!!!

In our state they now have a "crime" called "potential rapist." Once accused, a man must "prove" that he is not a potential rapist. The criminals in black robes and legislature seats claim that it is a "civil" conviction and not a criminal proceeding. The "civil" tag negates all the rights of the accused to fair trial, to innocent until proved guilty, etc. He has not been given a fair trial or any trial since he is "civil" criminal and has been accused of "potential" crime. No crime has been committed. No trial is needed because he has not been accused.

The penalty is life in prison without parole. They have a special prison for men who have been accused. Toss them into hell and throw away the key.

They are the evil scum of our times. The talking head media kiss their asses and applaud when a man is accused. The medieval witch hunters had less support.

Blessings

Bob

Quote from bobx23456

In our state they now have a "crime" called "potential rapist." Once accused, a man must "prove" that he is not a potential rapist. The criminals in black robes and legislature seats claim that it is a "civil" conviction and not a criminal proceeding. The "civil" tag negates all the rights of the accused to fair trial, to innocent until proved guilty, etc. He has not been given a fair trial or any trial since he is "civil" criminal and has been accused of "potential" crime. No crime has been committed. No trial is needed because he has not been accused.

The penalty is life in prison without parole. They have a special prison for men who have been accused. Toss them into hell and throw away the key.

They are the evil scum of our times. The talking head media kiss their asses and applaud when a man is accused. The medieval witch hunters had less support.

Blessings

Bob

That is one of the most frightening things I have heard in a while. Could you elaborate a little on that? For example, what constitutes someone's being a "potential rapist"? How does one wind up being accused and convicted for that non-crime? This sounds like the movie Minority Report.
Who are the pre-cogs than can omnisciently declare who will commit the act of rape unless imprisoned for life?

Quote from bobx23456

In our state they now have a "crime" called "potential rapist." Once accused, a man must "prove" that he is not a potential rapist. The criminals in black robes and legislature seats claim that it is a "civil" conviction and not a criminal proceeding. The "civil" tag negates all the rights of the accused to fair trial, to innocent until proved guilty, etc. He has not been given a fair trial or any trial since he is "civil" criminal and has been accused of "potential" crime. No crime has been committed. No trial is needed because he has not been accused.

The penalty is life in prison without parole. They have a special prison for men who have been accused. Toss them into hell and throw away the key.

They are the evil scum of our times. The talking head media kiss their asses and applaud when a man is accused. The medieval witch hunters had less support.

Blessings

Bob

more info please bob