Below is a transcript of a debate in the House of Lords, which took place on 16th May 2006: Suicide: False Rape Allegations

Translation: All men are rapists and a women would never lie about being raped!

TMOTS

At least they are trying and it's more than I have expected in the past. That male-hating bitch is just another feminist trying to justify their doctrine..

This is more that I have come expect from that house so it's a positive that it was even raised..

There we have it. Despite Lords Tebbitt and Campbell-Savours' efforts, Baroness Scotland of Arsehole just calls it a nicety of language and prefers her own employed Departmental feminist statisticoids.

An intersting and predictable (to us) exchange observed in the final three statements.

She referrs to victim and accused... he points it out... she changes subject immediately after a minor mention of agreement.

At least something is starting slowly to move.

There are plenty of complaints about false accusations against men in the UK, it's not only rape, but also sexual harassment, paternity fraud... and so on and the accuser, even with proven malicious intention, remains without punishment...

Men are getting more careful, when even just talking to a woman working in the same room....are refusing marriage more and more...where is no rape possible at all, there cannot be false rape allegations...

See what they get to work with. Shame on the MRM. Sorry but this won't help the suicide I saw a decade ago.

The debate in the Lords was over two years ago, and what has changed since? The blinkered feminists still cling to their biased and falsified pseudo-research.

I have looked at the report referred to in the debate, "A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases" and find it to be absolutely typical of studies by feminists that assume what they set out to prove, and use every form of biased technique and manipulation of language to reach the conclusion they want.

The "attrition" they refer to is the way that complaints of rape fall by the wayside until the numbers of convictions is only a tiny fraction of the former. Their purpose is very clearly to obtain more convictions - not to see justice done. They assume every complaint of rape is true, and repeatedly refer to complainants as victims and the accused as perpetrators or rapists. They even include complaints made by men among the statistics, which miraculously then become factual rapes against women, conveniently swelling the number of the latter.

And of course they assiduously work to narrow down the definition of a false complaint to this 3% figure, which is entirely bogus even according to the statistics published elsewhere in their own report, which indicate much higher rates. They even bury false accusations among other parts of the "attrition" statistics.

I am not going to launch into a detailed critique of this report, far too long: but it rewards study as a prime example of unscientific femi-prop in action, masquerading as serious study while peddling its own agenda. And this stupid government actually commissioned the report from a bunch of established misandrists. What other conclusion would they expect? But this piece of toilet paper now forms the basis for Baroness Scotland of the Tunnel Vision to dismiss the incidence of male suicides caused by liars of her own sex. She clearly has her priorities staked out, and fairness, justice and compassion have no place among them.