Re: Alleged "victim’s conviction for prostitution" as evidence
I never met a prostitute, who was not demanding payment in advance.
The whole article is nonsense...feminist nonsense.
Even if a prostitute agrees to be paid after, and even in case the customer does not pay her at all, it is still not rape - maybe you can call it theft or fraud.
Legally seen however, in feminist countries, it might be rape, as the prostitute has the right - a typical legal loophole - to withdraw her consent even days after she met her customer...but this might happen to every man, even to a married man who had sex with his wife...it might happen with no money involved at all.. suddenly out of the bad mood of the woman, consensual sex is rape.
Let's do something...Why remain silent?Let's talk back to unreasonable feminist demands.