Global About Half of Rape Allegations are False, Research Shows

Tyrael · #1 16th-November-2009

About Half of Rape Allegations are False, Research Shows

False allegations of rape are believed to be more common than many persons realize. These are the findings of four research studies:

- A review of 556 rape accusations filed against Air Force personnel found that 27% of women later recanted. Then 25 criteria were developed based on the profile of those women, and then submitted to three independent reviewers to review the remaining cases. If all three reviewers deemed the allegation was false, it was categorized as false. As a result, 60% of all allegations were found to be false.1 Of those women who later recanted, many didn't admit the allegation was false until just before taking a polygraph test. Others admitted it was false only after having failed a polygraph test.2

- In a nine-year study of 109 rapes reported to the police in a Midwestern city, Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin reported that in 41% of the cases the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred.3

- In a follow-up study of rape claims filed over a three-year period at two large Midwestern universities, Kanin found that of 64 rape cases, 50% turned out to be false.4 Among the false charges, 53% of the women admitted they filed the false claim as an alibi.5

- According to a 1996 Department of Justice report, “in about 25% of the sexual assault cases referred to the FBI, ... the primary suspect has been excluded by forensic DNA testing.6 It should be noted that rape involves a forcible and non-consensual act, and a DNA match alone does not prove that rape occurred. So the 25% figure substantially underestimates the true extent of false allegations.

And according to former Colorado prosecutor Craig Silverman, “For 16 years, I was a kick-ass prosecutor who made most of my reputation vigorously prosecuting rapists. ... I was amazed to see all the false rape allegations that were made to the Denver Police Department. ... A command officer in the Denver Police sex assaults unit recently told me he placed the false rape numbers at approximately 45%.”7

According to the FBI, about 95,000 forcible rapes were reported in 2004.8 Based on the statements and studies cited above, some 47,000 American men are falsely accused of rape each year. These men are disproportionately African-American.9

Some of these men are wrongly convicted, sentenced, and imprisoned. Even if there is no conviction, a false allegation of rape can “emotionally, socially, and economically destroy a person.”10

1 McDowell CP. False allegations. Forensic Science Digest, Vol. 11, No. 4, December 1985

2 Ibid.

3 Kanin EJ. An alarming national trend: False rape allegations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1994 http://www.sexcriminals.com/library/doc-1002-1.pdf

4 Ibid., p. 2, Kanin reports that in the city studied, "for a declaration of false charge to be made, the complainant must admit that no rape had occurred. ... The police department will not declare a rape charge as false when the complainant, for whatever reason, fails to pursue the charge or cooperate on the case, regardless how much doubt the police may have regarding the validity of the charge. In short, these cases are declared false only because the complainant admitted they are false. ... Thus, the rape complainants referred to in this paper are for completed forcible rapes only. The foregoing leaves us with a certain confidence that cases declared false by this police agency are indeed a reasonable -- if not a minimal -- reflection of false rape allegations made to this agency, especially when one considers that a finding of false allegation is totally dependent upon the recantation of the rape charge."

5 Ibid., Addenda.

6 Connors E, Lundregan T, Miller N, McEwen T. Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. June 1996 http://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/dnaevid.txt

7 TheDenverChannel.com - Kobe Bryant Trial - Craig's Court: I Call Them As I See Them

8 Federal Bureau of Investigation. Forcible rape. February 17, 2006. Forcible Rape - Crime in the United States 2004

9 Innocence Project: Facts on post-conviction DNA exonerations. The Innocence Project - News and Information: Fact Sheets

10 Angelucci M, Sacks G. Research shows false allegations of rape common. Los Angeles Daily Journal, Sept. 15, 2004. GlennSacks.com Research Shows False Accusations of Rape Common

Link.

Quote:

Research Shows False Accusations of Rape Common

Despite its many painful and unseemly aspects, the Kobe Bryant rape case and the media storm surrounding it have drawn attention to a severely neglected problem: false rape accusations.In her recent Daily Journal column, high profile feminist professor Wendy Murphy dismisses the problem of false accusations as an "ugly myth," and calls for "boiling rage" activism to address what she perceives as the anti-woman bias of the criminal justice system. Like many victims' advocates, Murphy cannot seem to fathom the possibility that Bryant could be innocent. However, research shows that false allegations of rape are frighteningly common.

According to a nine-year study conducted by former Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin, in over 40 percent of the cases reviewed, the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred (Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1994). Kanin also studied rape allegations in two large Midwestern universities and found that 50 percent of the allegations were recanted by the accuser.

Kanin found that most of the false accusers were motivated by a need for an alibi or a desire for revenge. Kanin was once well known and lauded by the feminist movement for his groundbreaking research on male sexual aggression. His studies on false rape accusations, however, received very little attention.

Kanin's findings are hardly unique. In 1985 the Air Force conducted a study of 556 rape accusations. Over one quarter of the accusers admitted, either just before they took a lie detector test of after they had failed it, that no rape occurred. A further investigation by independent reviewers found that 60 percent of the original rape allegations were false.

The most common reasons the women gave for falsely accusing rape were "spite or revenge," and to compensate for feelings of guilt or shame (Forensic Science Digest, vol. 11. no. 4, December 1985).

A Washington Post investigation of rape reports in seven Virginia and Maryland counties in 1990 and 1991 found that nearly one in four were unfounded. When contacted by the Post, many of the alleged victims admitted that they had lied.

It is true, of course, that not every accuser who recants had accused falsely. But it is also true that some who do not recant were not telling the truth.

According to a 1996 Department of Justice Report, of the roughly 10,000 sexual assault cases analyzed with DNA evidence over the previous seven years, 2,000 excluded the primary suspect, and another 2,000 were inconclusive. The report notes that these figures mirror an informal National Institute of Justice survey of private laboratories, and suggests that there exists "some strong, underlying systemic problems that generate erroneous accusations and convictions."

Craig Silverman, a former Colorado prosecutor known for his zealous prosecution of rapists during his 16-year career, says that false rape accusations occur with "scary frequency." As a regular commentator on the Bryant trial for Denver's ABC affiliate, Silverman noted that "any honest veteran sex assault investigator will tell you that rape is one of the most falsely reported crimes." According to Silverman, a Denver sex-assault unit commander estimates that nearly half of all reported rape claims are false.

The media has largely ignored these studies and experts and has instead promoted the notion that only 2% of rape allegations are false. This figure was made famous by feminist Susan Brownmiller in her 1975 book Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. Brownmiller was relaying the alleged comments of a New York judge concerning the rate of false rape accusations in a New York City police precinct in 1974.

A 1997 Columbia Journalism Review analysis of rape statistics noted that the 2% statistic is often falsely attributed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and has no clear and credible study to support it. The FBI's statistic for "unfounded" rape accusations is 9%, but this definition only includes cases where the accuser recants or the evidence contradicts her story. Instances where the case is dismissed for lack of evidence are not included in the "unfounded" category. Brownmiller's credibility can be assessed by her assertion in Against Our Will that rape is "nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear."

Murphy also contends that the criminal justice system is stacked against women, and that the law reform initiatives promoted during the past three decades have "failed to make a bit of difference in the justice system's handling of rape cases." In reality, feminist advocacy and the now ubiquitous rape-shield laws have made an enormous difference in the way the system treats rape cases.

Some of these changes have been fair, and have led to greater protections for rape victims. However, others have made it more difficult for men to defend themselves, with at times horrifying consequences for the accused.

For example, in December, the Arkansas Supreme Court denied an appeal by Ralph Taylor, who is serving a 13-year sentence for rape. The court held that evidence of the victim's alleged prior false allegations of rape was inadmissible because it was considered sexual conduct within the meaning of the state's rape shield statute. In that case, the defense proffered the testimony of two friends of the alleged victim, both of whom claimed that she had previously falsely accused another man of raping her. The court added that admitting such evidence could "inflame the jury."

In her book Ceasefire: Why Women and Men Must Join Forces to Achieve True Equality, Boston Globe columnist Cathy Young details numerous questionable rulings in which potentially innocent men were prevented from properly defending themselves by the rape shield laws which Murphy endorses.

One of these cases concerns an 18 year-old Wisconsin boy named Charles Steadman, who in 1993 was sentenced to eight years in prison for allegedly raping an older woman. Steadman was underage when the crime allegedly occurred, but was prohibited from revealing that his accuser was currently facing criminal charges of having sex with minors, and thus had an excellent reason to claim that the sex with Steadman was not consensual. Such evidence was deemed related to his accuser's sexual history and thus inadmissible.

In 1997, sportscaster Marv Albert was accused of assault and battery during a sexual encounter with a woman with whom he had had a 10-year sexual relationship. Albert sought to introduce evidence that his accuser, who had been in a mental hospital six weeks before the alleged assault, had previously made false accusations against men who had left her, as Albert, who was engaged to be married, was planning to do. Albert's offer of proof was denied, compromising his ability to defend himself. Facing a possible life sentence, he chose to plead guilty to misdemeanor assault.

Murphy's dogged attacks on Ruckriegle as a veritable "advocate for the accused" are also without foundation. Far from being a black robed patriarch in league with the defendant, Ruckriegle's rulings were reasonable and, if anything, minimalist. It is not the rulings but the reaction to them by victims' advocates and the media which are worrisome.

For example, Ruckriegle granted a defense motion that Bryant's accuser would not be referred to as "the victim" in court. Such labeling, as opposed to "alleged victim" or "accuser," undermines the presumption of innocence. However, this motion was hotly contested by both the prosecution and by victims' rights organizations, which filed amicus briefs and complained that Ruckriegle's decision created an anti-woman double-standard.

Ruckriegle also allowed Bryant to introduce evidence that his accuser had had other sexual encounters in the 72 hours before her medical examination for the alleged assault. Bryant's defense team contended that the microscopic vaginal injuries the prosecution claimed were suffered in the alleged assault could instead have been the product of various consensual sexual encounters.

Media commentators labeled the 72 hour decision a "bombshell for prosecutors" that "threatens all women," and likened Ruckriegle to a man who has "tiptoed into a minefield."

Murphy is correct that rape is a horrible crime. But false accusations of rape are every bit as horrible. They are a form of psychological rape that can emotionally, socially, and economically destroy a person even if there is no conviction, especially for those of less fame and fortune than Bryant. The stigma attaches to the falsely accused for life. Few believe them and few care. Prosecutors systematically refuse to prosecute the perpetrators. And victims' advocates like Murphy refuse to see falsely accused men as victims, and instead work to minimize and conceal the problem.

This column first appeared in the Los Angeles Daily Journal and San Francisco Daily Journal (9/15/04).

Marc E. Angelucci is a public interest attorney in Los Angeles and is the president of the Los Angeles Chapter of the National Coalition of Free Men.

Link.

False Claims of Rape Hurt Real Victims, Advocates Say

April 30, 2007, Contact: Mark Rosenthal, 781-956-1034

WASHINGTON, April 30, 2007 – The recent exonerations of men wrongfully accused of rape reveals that false allegations not only represent a travesty of justice, they also end up harming true victims of rape, advocates note.

Last week a Chicago judge exonerated Jerry Miller, who spent 24 years in prison following a wrongful conviction of rape in 1982. And two weeks ago, North Carolina district attorney Roy Cooper declared the three Duke University lacrosse players innocent of all charges.

Half of all rape claims are believed to be false – studies show that 27-50% of women end up recanting their allegations. (http://www.mediaradar.org/research_o...llegations.php)

False rape claims harm real victims in 3 ways, explain advocates:

1. The time and resources devoted to investigating false claims deprives real victims of the services they need.
2. Prosecutors and juries become more likely to dismiss victim testimony.
3. Rape victims are more reluctant to come forward and file a complaint.

"Thanks to a false allegation of rape, millions of dollars in taxpayer money were spent prosecuting the Duke lacrosse players," notes Teri Stoddard, RADAR spokesperson. "That money should have gone to helping real victims, instead."

Players and attorneys in the Duke case are calling for reform of the criminal justice system. "There seem to be some flaws in the legal system that should be addressed," remarked Collin Finnerty shortly after he was declared innocent of all charges.

False allegations of domestic violence are widespread, according to a recent RADAR report: http://www.mediaradar.org/docs/VAWA-...llegations.pdf . Eighty groups around the country are now calling for broad reform of the nation’s laws that govern the prosecution of sexual assault and domestic violence.

R.A.D.A.R. – Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting – is a non-profit, non-partisan organization of men and women working to improve the effectiveness of our nation's approach to solving domestic violence. http://www.mediaradar.org.

Link.

Beyond Duke: About Half Of All Rape Allegations Are False

The false allegations of rape that damaged the lives of 46 members of the Duke Lacrosse Team, nearly sent three to prison for thirty years each, and cost families many millions of dollars in legal fees was not a one-of-a-kind aberration of justice. Other infamous cases involving well-known individuals such as Kobe Bryant1, John Fund2, and CNN’s Tucker Carlson3 provide additional public evidence that false rape allegations are a major public problem – one where the perpetrator is rarely punished.

While researchers and prosecutors do not agree on the percentage of false allegations, the consensus is that approximately 40% to 50% of charges are clearly false. This number does not include unresolved allegations held “in limbo” where evidence is too weak to try the case even under shield laws, relaxed rules, and comparatively weak evidentiary standards applied to rape cases:

- A survey of all the forcible rape complaints during a three-year period at two large Midwestern state universities found that 50 percent of the accusations were false.4
- In a nine-year study of all resolved rape cases in a Midwestern U.S. city of 70,000, the accusers recanted their charges 41 percent of the time. The 41 percent figure does not include the other accusations that the police department recorded as unfounded, for which there was insufficient evidence to establish the assault.5
- According to a report of the Defense Department Inspector General released in 2005, approximately 73% of women and 72% of men at the military service academies believe that false accusations of sexual assault are a problem.6

The culture of false allegations of violence bears unacceptably high costs. Families and innocent lives are destroyed by our wasted tax dollars, while real cases go ignored or unprosecuted. Judges and juries are fooled and make bad decisions.

Every American who believes in justice has an important task to do this week:

1. Telephone your representative in Congress and ask if he or she has released a statement about the Duke Lacrosse case. You can find your representative's phone number by going to http://www.house.gov and entering your zip code, or by calling 202-224-3121.
2. If the answer is “yes,” then have them send you the statement. Forward your representative's name and statement to info@mediaradar.org
3. If the answer is “no”, then encourage your representative to take this issue seriously and request a statement regarding the case be released.
4. You may also wish to contact your representative in your State Legislature and make the same request.

1 Kobe Bryant, Rape Shield Laws, and the False Accusations Problem; http://www.hisside.com/3_21_04.htm

2 False Rape Charges Hurt Real Victims, http://www.equityfeminism.com/archiv...03/000062.html

3 Tucker Carlson and False Rape Allegations; http://www.equityfeminism.com/archiv...03/000062.html

4 Kanin, Eugene J., Ph.D. "False Rape Allegations." Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1 (1994), pp 81-92.; http://www.anandaanswers.com/pages/naaFalse.html

5 Ibid., (4)

6 Sex, Lies, and Rape, Center For Military Readiness; http://www.cmrlink.org/social.asp?DocID=276

Link.

Tyrael · #2 16th-November-2009

Quote:

Harm to Boys and Leniency Toward their Female Abusers in Australia
October 26th, 2009 by Robert Franklin, Esq.

If women are treated more leniently, it may be that there is a pervasive view that no real harm is done. But there is growing evidence that not only are young male victims of female sexual abuse severely affected, but that they are also at higher risk of going on to become abusers themselves.

This excellent article out of Australia deals with sexual abuse of boys by older women, its effects on them later in life, attitudes about that and the lenient sentences women who commit statutory rape incur (The Age, 3/10/06). It's not a new piece, but it's worth revisiting, particularly since the Rudd government seems poised to roll back equally shared parenting laws on the flawed premise that men are uniquely dangerous to children.

The article points out that boys who are sexually abused by older women are potentially harmed for life. Specifically, they themselves tend to incur short term depression and long time problems with intimacy with women. Worse, it cites four Canadian studies as finding,

"an alarmingly high rate of sexual abuse by females in the backgrounds of rapists, sex offenders and sexually aggressive men (and) male adolescent sex offenders abused by 'females only' chose female victims almost exclusively".

Obviously, those are correlational, not necessarily causative factors, but, as with all significant correlational data, they may suggest a measure of causation.

Whatever the case, researcher Patrick O'Leary of the University of South Australia has found that the effects of female sexual abuse of boys is, if anything, greater than that of male abuse of boys.

As to sentencing of female abusers of boys, the article says,

A series of research papers released last September by Victoria's Sentencing Advisory Council has noted that women convicted of manslaughter and murder receive shorter prison terms and shorter non-parole periods than male offenders. That difference may be partly explained by the differing circumstances underlying male and female homicide, but even in cases of culpable driving women are treated more leniently, with shorter average sentences — although the latest statistics show the gap is closing.

Given that background of leniency in sentencing of female perpetrators, the article wonders if the same might be true of female sexual abusers of boys. It goes on to cite several cases in which female perpetrators were given suspended sentences and quotes one judge as saying,

"It does seem to be an offensive principle that a female teacher in these circumstances is treated more leniently than a male teacher would be."

One of the possible reasons for the leniency is the widespread public perception that boys are willing participants and therefore no harm has been done. The article, to its great credit, is a pains to dispel that notion.

While it's true that, for many adolescent boys, having sex with an older woman may fulfill a fantasy. But boys have lots of fantasies that we would hesitate to exonerate adults for helping them act on. A boy might fantasize about using crack cocaine. Would it be OK for an adult to buy it for him and show him how to smoke it? The point is that boys aren't adults and don't always know what's good for them. To exonerate or treat with leniency an adult because of a child's misconceptions simply doesn't make sense.

As Dr. O'Leary says,

"The idea that it's some sort of fantasy or that it will be a rite of passage is a myth."

Thanks to Michael for the heads-up.

Link.

shaazam · #3 16th-November-2009

The false allegations of rape that damaged the lives of 46 members of the Duke Lacrosse Team, nearly sent three to prison for thirty years each, and cost families many millions of dollars in legal fees was not a one-of-a-kind aberration of justice. Other infamous cases involving well-known individuals such as Kobe Bryant1, John Fund2, and CNN’s Tucker Carlson3 provide additional public evidence that false rape allegations are a major public problem – one where the perpetrator is rarely punished.

""additional public evidence that false rape allegations are a major public problem – one where the perpetrator is rarely punished."

sure they are not cause they are the doyens of the feminit lie until ya drop brigade and cannot do wrong

the feminit system is ever alert for male patsys to incarcerate on false rape allegations by malicious feminit wimyn

Zuberi · #4 16th-November-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by shaazam

The false allegations of rape that damaged the lives of 46 members of the Duke Lacrosse Team, nearly sent three to prison for thirty years each, and cost families many millions of dollars in legal fees was not a one-of-a-kind aberration of justice. Other infamous cases involving well-known individuals such as Kobe Bryant1, John Fund2, and CNN’s Tucker Carlson3 provide additional public evidence that false rape allegations are a major public problem – one where the perpetrator is rarely punished.

""additional public evidence that false rape allegations are a major public problem – one where the perpetrator is rarely punished."

sure they are not cause they are the doyens of the feminit lie until ya drop brigade and cannot do wrong

the feminit system is ever alert for male patsys to incarcerate on false rape allegations by malicious feminit wimyn

An you wonder why feminism is steadily falling apart!

themanonthestreet · #5 16th-November-2009

That whole sexual history is not admissable shit always bothered me...

Think about it. If I am a habitual B & E type, it would be prudent for the procecutor to bring my past... say three arrests for B & E up? Of course! It proves that the viability of the newest charges to be oh... I donno... possibly true? Notice I did not say verdicts. I said arrests intentionally.

It STILL doesn't mean that I AM a thief. It means that I, for some odd reason, have the tendency to be either in the wrong place at the wrong time... alot! Or that I am just good at getting off.

BTW; this IS now the system works for EVERY OTHER CRIME today.

If a woman has a a past for making false accusations of sexual misconduct/rape, wouldn't it be prudent to show that this newest accusation might not be true as well? Or at least it should be given a more serious inspection?

As with the B & E type, it doesn't mean that she is lying THIS TIME. But it does means that she, for some odd reason, has the tendency to be either in the wrong place at the wrong time... getting raped - alot! Or that she is in fact, full of shit.

IF THIS accusation is found to be true, her past accusations are no longer rellivent - true or false. But if found to be yet another false accusation - read a crime! - she now faces charges herself. Of course, this IS NOT how it works.

GESH!

TMOTS

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
False rape allegations	frostyboy	General Blog Chat	0	2nd-September-2008 03:50 PM
RADAR ALERT: Beyond Duke: About Half Of All Rape Allegations Are False	Feckless	False Allegations	7	15th-August-2008 04:26 PM
Allegations of rape in Rivington are false	frostyboy	False Allegations	0	8th-July-2008 08:18 PM
Studies: Over 50% of Rape Allegations Are False	Marx	False Allegations	4	29th-July-2006 08:36 AM