Women: The Scientific Difference

In our last foray into this fascinating area, we discussed the fact that the genders are dramatically different. Of course, when you tell this to normal people, they look at you puzzled, as if you have just told them one and one is two. They think you are patronizing them. Doesn’t everybody know the genders are different? It’s a “discovery” you don’t need gargantuan brain power to make. Remember that the reason this is so crucial to understand is that the putative sameness of the genders is the mother principle of feminism, which is tearing us apart.

The trouble is: everybody doesn’t know that. Hordes of pathetically brainwashed womanoids don’t know it. Like a true female, a womanoid has a more pronounced forecastle and afterdeck than a man, but it isn’t a man and isn’t really a woman. A womanoid is to a woman as a humanoid is to a human. Academia swarms with pansy professors who don’t know the difference. Some professors are among the dumbest people on earth. Of course, this is one reason our birth rate will soon fall to emergency levels and the native population will be supplanted.

So, as you will recall, in a previous piece I delved into some personal experiences to “prove” the redundant point. You have your own. I also promised to buttress those anecdotal reminiscences with the findings of real science. Here they are, in The Female Brain – yes, there is one – by Louann Brizendine, M.D. (New York, Morgan Road Books, 2006).

Did the author realize how politically incorrect even the title of her book is? Maybe that is why it has garnered next to no recognition. It is an especially authoritative source, because the author is not only a woman, a normal woman, with her own female brain, but also because she is a physician who can explain that brain, which she does brilliantly. Because her female brain is scientific, she also adapts her thinking to newfound facts.

For instance, as I understand it, Dr. Brizendine tried at first to raise her son using the most politically approved unisex methods. Brizendine junior confounded them by emerging as a true, little boy. If you are a pansy professor or a feminoid and don’t know what this means, see my previous piece on the subject.

So, what has Dr. Brizendine found? Browsing through The Female Brain, you will discover that many of the so-called myths, and even some of the cartoons, are true. For instance, “. . . Women may remember the smallest details of their first dates, and their biggest fights, while their husbands barely remember that these things happened. . . .” (P. 4) Why? Are you ready for this? Because of “an astonishing array of structural, chemical, genetic, hormonal and functional brain differences between women and men.” (Loc. Cit.)

The famous cartoon of the male and female brains shows a miniscule sex particle in the latter, along with a substantial headache generator and shoe department; on the contrary, the male brain includes a vast, empty wasteland devoted to sex and beer. Guess what? You always thought it was just a cartoon, right?

But Dr. Louann says it’s true: “. . . Men, by contrast, have two and a half times the brain space devoted to sexual drive . . . . Sexual thoughts float through a man’s brain every fifty-two seconds on average, and through a woman’s only once a day. Perhaps three to four times on her hottest days.” (P. 5)

Male and female brains are physically, measurably, different, she says. “. . . Girls arrive already wired as girls, and boys arrive already wired as boys. Their brains are different by the time they’re born, and their brains are what drive their impulses, values, and their very reality.” (P. 12)

Women have bigger communication centers. Dr. Louann says they use about 20,000 words a day. Men use about 7,000. Women also talk twice as fast as men, all of which you knew. Could this facility with words be at least part of the reason so many women stick with scum bags who beat them up, if those scum bags also have the ability to sweet talk?

This is why, in Colonial America, women convicted of “talking too much” were put into the town stocks with wooden clips on their tongues, or seated on the “dunking stool,” held underwater and almost drowned. (P. 36) This never was done to men, because men were able to keep their mouths shut. Today, we are told, the federal government does this to enemies who don’t talk enough. They call it “water boarding.”

A woman wore probably the greatest tee-shirt I’ve ever seen. Huge letters adorning a world-class bosom proclaimed: “PMS.” Beneath those letters, the shirt said: “Just Do It My Way, And Nobody Gets Hurt.” The female cycle has long been celebrated in song and humor. Everyone with any sense – which of course would exclude feminoids, pansy professors and politicians – understands that the menstrual cycle is evidence of a profound difference between the genders.

Dr. Brizendine explains as follows: “In the last few days of the menstrual cycle, when progesterone collapses, this calming effect is abruptly withdrawn, leaving the brain momentarily upset, stressed, and irritable. . . . Many women say they cry more easily and often feel out of sorts, stressed, aggressive, negative, hostile, or even hopeless and depressed right before their periods begin. . . .” (P. 45)

This is why, as I wrote in an earlier piece, one girl equals four boys. The boy is generally a simple soul with one basic mood. The girl is an emotional bloodbath. So, the point I am making is that the cyclical craziness is “normal.” That is why, if you have one girl, you should really go ahead and get another. My wife, a true expert, explains that if you have two or more girls they will drive each other crazy: if you have only one girl, she will drive you crazy.

Dr. Louann writes, “. . . Those women with the least estrogen and progesterone are more sensitive to stress and have fewer serotonin brain cells. For these most stress-sensitive individuals, the final days before their periods start can be hell on earth. Hostility, hopeless feelings of depression, plans for suicide, panic attacks, fear and uncontrollable bouts of crying and rage can plague them. . . .” (Italics added, P. 47)

Hell on earth! The doctor says that in twenty years of practice, she has seen hundreds of girls and women with problems like this. Most of these victims blame themselves. Some have been in psychotherapy for years, many accused of drug use and bad attitudes. The reason says Dr. Brizendine is that “the very structure of their brains is changing, from day to day and from week to week. . . .” (P48)

The doctor says that during the final three months of pregnancy, the mother’s brain actually shrinks. Meanwhile, the thinking part of the brain, the cortex, enlarges. But, “while the body is gaining weight, the brain is actually losing it. In the final one to two weeks before giving birth, the brain begins to increase again in size as it constructs large networks of maternal circuits. Otherwise, the child’s first sentence would have to be, ‘Mommy, I shrunk your brain.’” (P. 100)

So, there is a wealth of scientific, medical evidence – accessible because of modern technology – that the genders are not just different in some respects, but that they are dramatically unalike. Today’s doctors can actually see these changes taking place. Yet, in the face of all this evidence, the womanoids and the pansy professors continue to maintain that there are few differences and that they are superficial. If that were true, if they were essentially the same, they should receive the same treatment; but, if they are profoundly different, logic says so should be the treatment. Obviously, something suspicious is at work.

There is a medical name for the problem – PMDD – Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder, and women under its influence have successfully used it to plead temporary insanity after committing serious crimes in England and France. Could I safely assume that nobody with any sense would want a victim of PMDD sitting in the White House with a beautifully manicured acrylic finger poised atop the button that launches the nation’s nuclear weapons?

So, as we have seen, women are supposed to be crazy. The condition is normal. Why? I don’t know. Is it supposed to be part of the punishment for Original Sin? Whatever the reason, the problem is that today’s women are a lot crazier than they are supposed to be, which is not normal; it’s downright unnatural. My contention is that someone is deliberately driving women crazy. Our purpose in these pieces is to find out who is doing that and why.
Posted by Alan Stang on 08/08 at 09:47 AM
www.alanstang.com/the_scientific_difference/



~Response to his blog:
Dear Alan,

I can put you on track towards answering the last question as to why “they” are trying to drive women crazier than they normally are..It is all part of a preconceived program...keep in mind that CURRENTLY 2007, 50% or so of families are single parent FEMALE head of household and the enormous pressures placed upon these poorly prepared women leading a fatherless household, THE ABORTION MILLS ARE TURNING AND YOUNG WOMEN ROUTINELY MURDER THEIR UNBORN CHILDREN BY THE MILLIONS besides having a few live ones at home, leaving them with the burden of guilt and self-hate very early in their reproductive lives!

We are created to reproduce ourselves through the God given body and soul of the sensitive WOMAN, knowing this, Evil Social Engineers have craftily steered our society to become the mass of multi-generational confused hedonistic drug driven/sustained self-absorbed degenerate imbeciles, found that it is very easy to convince the average tall on emotion and short on intellect love-starved woman, that it is ok to rebell (learned from rock music and freaky boyfriends) and cast her present or would be family to heck for whatever reasons, to indulge her fantasies of self/love, wealth, eternal beauty and power if she should so reach out and take it.
In this society these deluded females, the main protector of hearth and child to abandoning their God-given instincts and to hypnotically pursue these false fantasmagoria for fleeting pleasures. After a few years their natural beauty wanes and they are left bitter and alone (and become even more nuts), isolated and childless or the equivalent of childless because when your own children and grandchildren start copying this deluded lifestyle and philosophy which all involved believe is normal, they themselves will abandon the mom in later years and they in turn instill this warped unnatural philosophy forward generationally, ad-infinitum. The nursing home, psychiatric ward or funeral palor being the inheritors of the deluded.

The kicker is that modern technology and society supports this meaningless, insane existance and women exhilbit their most negative
characteristics, La Luna personified!
Thank you for allowing me to express my thoughts,
Sincerely
Valeriasusan Clary
Posted by Valeriasusan A Clary on 08/11 at 07:32 AM

`

Seems true to me!

Yeah!
What else is new?

Anybody discovered the wheel yet?

I guess one day they will come to the conclusion that women are better at breastfeeding than men, and that this is a major reason why the old 50-50 parentsharing thing cant work for the breast dependant..