Men are rapist / murderers - racial profiling

**Feckless** · 16th-October-2008

I was wondering if this is helpful in argumentations with feminists. I have seen it more than once that feminists are saying that white males are the most privileged but on the other hand say sth like all men are rapist / violence is a male thing etc. Now there is a bias in that as more crimes are actually done by minorities than white males. Some math on rape and sexual assault (combined in the study / I will call it RSA / source below):

Calculation 1:

White victims RSA : 111.490 -> RSA by white perpetrator -> 44,5%
Black victims RSA : 36.620 -> RSA by white perpetrator -> 0%

White perpetrator RSA in total -> 49.613 -> 33,5%
Non white perpetrator RSA in total -> 98.497 -> 66,5%

Now assuming all these rapes and sexual assaults have been comitted by males we can compare the numbers with people living in the USA:

Overall: 303.824.640
Male: 148.874.073 (49% of the above)
White males: 119.248.132 (80,1% white)
Males not white: 29.625.941

Compared to the number of RSA assuming every RSA stands for one perpetrator:

White: 49.613 / 119.248.132 * 100 = 0,04%
Not white: 98.497 / 29.625.941 * 100 = 0,33%

Conclusion: Given the numbers from sources below (victim statistics), non white people are 8,25 times more likely to commit rape / sexual assault.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Problems with calculation 1:
- Calculation was with population of 2008 while the statistic was from 2005
- The rapes / sexual assaults included male on male, female on male and female on female rape subtracting them would lower the rsa percentage number
- I assumed that every rape was done by another men. In reality one individuum often assaults more than one victim. Calculating this would lower our number (Feminist Barry Deutsch says this as well somewhere here ( http://antimisandry.com/chit-chat-ma...n-13144-4.html ))
- The number of males includes males below the age of 16 those who do not rape. Subtracting them would raise the rape number
- I assumed that the percentage of females is in all racial groups 51%. This could be wrong. Black males have the lowest life expectations
----------------------------------------------------------------

Calculation 2 with corrected numbers:

Adjusted population:

Population of 2005 - 296.000.000
http://www.reuters.com/article/press...08+PRN20080211

Population of 2008 - 303.824.640
0-14 years: 20.1% (male 31.257.108/female 29.889.645)
0-14 years: percentage of males: 31.257.108 / 303.824.640 * 100 = 10,28%
0-14 years: number of males in 2005 calculated: 296.000.000 / 100 * 10,28 = 30.428.800
https://www.cia.gov/library/publicat...k/geos/us.html

Males in 2005 (49% of total): 296.000.000 / 100 * 49 = 145.040.000
Males in 2005 older than 14: 145.040.000 - 30.428.800 = 114.611.200
White (80,1%) males in 2005 older than 14: 114.611.200 / 100 * 80,1 = 91.803.571
Non white males in 2005 older than 14: 22.807.629

Adjusted number of rapes and assault:
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus05.pdf
Table 2: Rates per 1.000[code]
Both Female Male
Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rape/Assault 191.670 0,8 176.540 1,4 15.130 0,1
-Rape 69.370 0,3 66.670 0,5 2.700 0,0
-Assault 61.530 0,3 61.530 0,5 0 0,0
-Att. Rape 60.770 0,2 48.340 0,4 12.430 0,1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall crime 5.400.790 22,1 2.273.320 18,1 3.127.470 26,3
[/code]This is the most important table. I will use the red numbers (115.010 - what is sexual assault? Touching in the subway?) to determine the percentage of male rapist. Sadly the table for race mixes numbers on rape and assault, so I am assuming that all races are roughly comitting same number of rape and attempted rape. On the above notice that there were no prisoners asked (thats a good one, so the gouvernment doesn´t have to deal with females that are no longer the biggest victim of sexual violence + the uncomfortable truth about prison rape (more than 100.000 rapes)). Also note that males are more often the victim in EVERY other crime except the sexual ones.

White victims RSA : 111.490 -> RSA by white perpetrator -> 44,5%
Black victims RSA : 36.620 -> RSA by white perpetrator -> 0%

White perpetrator RSA in total -> 49.613 -> 33,5%
Non white perpetrator RSA in total -> 98.497 -> 66,5%

I´ll use the percentage from the above (source table 42)

Compared to the number of RSA assuming every RSA stands for one perpetrator:

Rapes and attempted by whites 33,5%: 115.010 -> 38.528
Rapes and attempted by non whites 66,5%: 115.010 -> 76.481

White: 38.528 / 91.803.871 * 100 = 0,041%
Not white: 76.481 / 22.807.829 * 100 = 0,33%

Conclusion: Given the numbers from sources below (victim statistics), non white people are 8,25 times more likely to commit rape or attempted rape.

And nothing has changed...wtf...

----------------------------------------------------------------
Problems with calculation 2:
- Calculated some numbers
- The rapes included female on female
- I assumed that every rape was done by another men. In reality one individuum often assaults more than one victim. Calculating this would lower our number (Feminist Barry Deutsch says this as well somewhere here ( http://antimisandry.com/chit-chat-ma...n-13144-4.html ))
- I assumed that the percentage of females is in all racial groups 51%. This could be wrong. Black males have the lowest life expectations
----------------------------------------------------------------
Life time calculation assuming the life expectatcy for men is 75,15 years minus those who are too young and were excluded (until age 14):
White males that are rapist or tried to rape: 0,041% * (75,15 - 14) = 2,5% -> 1 in 40
Non white males that are rapist or tried to rape: 0,33% * (75,15 - 14) = 20,1 % -> 1 in 4,98

----------------------------------------------------------------
Now pointing this out is not racist. It is a fact. The reason for this has imho sth to do with the number of single mothers, specially if you are black, (70% / knowing that most rapist have been raised by single mothers, this is another proof) and of course the circumstances and surrounding you grew up in. You don´t have to be a professor to understand that someone raised by a single mother in a poor surrounding is more likely to become a criminal than a well cared for kid from the upper class. So we come back to our discussion:

Feminist: Stop whining, white males have the most privileges. Males are raping thousands and thousands of women each year.

Anti-Feminist: Interesting that you brought race into the picture. Look at this numbers (points out the above). Would you now say that rape is mostly a race issue? You can´t blame the white privileged for crimes they did not commit.

Probably helpful, but maybe not. I really feel uncomfortable for bringing up race (Germans have sth like a collective guilt when it comes to racial discussions) but there is truth in that. Discussing with homicide numbers is far more obvious:

[code]Homicide Offending Rates per 100,000 Population by Race

White Black Other
1990 5.6 46.6 4.2
1991 5.6 51.4 5.4
1992 5.2 47.0 5.7
1993 5.2 49.2 5.6
1994 5.1 45.4 5.1
1995 4.9 39.3 5.4
1996 4.5 35.9 4.8
1997 4.1 32.2 4.5
1998 4.2 27.8 3.9
1999 3.6 25.4 3.9
2000 3.5 25.6 3.3
2001 3.5 25.6 3.0
2002 3.6 25.0 2.9
2003 3.5 25.3 3.4
2004 3.6 24.1 2.7
2005 3.5 26.5 2.8[/code]Bureau of Justice Statistics Homicide Trends in the United States: Trends in offending by race table

Articles:

The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States By Lawrence Auster
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, May 03, 2007
Like Ahab's search for the Great White Whale, liberals' search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley's and Al Sharpton's then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn't matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men's treatment of black women in this country. When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America.

To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under "Victims and Offenders" download the pdf file for 2005.)
In Table 42, entitled "Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender," we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.

The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:

In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.
What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.

The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false:

Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney's Sex Crimes Unit, noted, "There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen.... It's my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it's my job to prosecute the real thing."

No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America. A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her. There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the gnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.

Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, "a white woman was raped by black man." Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women's apartments on Manhattan's Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media's reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists. In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist.

**Stan** · 16th-October-2008

.
So...the white male rape rate is 0.04%??

Am I reading that correctly?

Then how come the Feminists act like they will be rape three more times before lunch time by three different men and please help them?

**Marx** · 16th-October-2008

Interesting numbers... facts & figures here we come

**Feckless** · 16th-October-2008

Moment please....data is from here:

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/cvusst.htm
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cvus05.pdf

To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under "Victims and Offenders" download the pdf file for 2005.)
In Table 42, entitled "Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender," we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.

This is the Rape AND SEXUAL ASSAULt combined number from the victimization study

National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is the Nation's primary source of information on criminal victimization. Each year, data are obtained from a nationally representative sample of 76,000 households comprising nearly 135,300 persons on the frequency, characteristics and consequences of criminal victimization in the United States. The survey enables BJS to estimate the likelihood of victimization by rape, sexual assault, robbery, assault, theft, household burglary, and motor vehicle theft for the population as a whole as well as for segments of the population such as women, the elderly, members of various racial groups, city dwellers, or other groups. The NCVS provides the largest national forum for victims to describe the impact of crime and characteristics of violent offenders.

This is of course interesting as well (from the same study if I understand it)

http://www.ojp.gov/bjs/glance/rape.htm

There are a few math errors in it but I believe 0,04% is correct. This is a yearly number.

This number means that 0,04% of all white males have raped a female in 2005 or that 1 in 2500 white men is a rapist in that year.

**Marx** · 16th-October-2008

That can't be right - 1 in 2,500 - noooo, it can't be! Surely it's more than that! I mean, we're ALL rapists, aren't we?

**Feckless** · 16th-October-2008

Especially the evil patriarchic white men holding all the strings in his hands.....muhahahahahahahahaha

**Feckless** · 16th-October-2008

What I forgot to mention. The important message is:

Men don´t rape women (or kill) because they hate them / can´t control their own sexdrive / are violent, but because there has to be sth wrong with the way they were raised, their surrounding etc.

**Marx** · 16th-October-2008

Environmental factors.

Another important question would be, is 'rape' defined by feminist standards (looking too long, speaking, breathing) or traditional (brutal, violent attack of a sexual nature)?

**Feckless** · 16th-October-2008

Fuck I totally scewed the numbers....damn this number is at least 100% higher....I´ll edit the first post

**Stan** · 16th-October-2008

Guess what folks?

A disproportionate number of rapists come from a home with...

(you know what I am going to say dontcha???)

NO DAD!!

**Stan** · 16th-October-2008

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cr...pes-per-capita

Crime Statistics > Rapes (per capita) (most recent) by country VIEW DATA: Totals Per capita
Definition Source Printable version

Bar Graph Map

Showing latest available data. Rank Countries Amount (top to bottom)
#1 South Africa: 1.19538 per 1,000 people
#2 Seychelles: 0.788294 per 1,000 people
#3 Australia: 0.777999 per 1,000 people
#4 Montserrat: 0.749384 per 1,000 people
#5 Canada: 0.733089 per 1,000 people
#6 Jamaica: 0.476608 per 1,000 people
#7 Zimbabwe: 0.457775 per 1,000 people
#8 Dominica: 0.34768 per 1,000 people
#9 United States: 0.301318 per 1,000 people
#10 Iceland: 0.246009 per 1,000 people
#11 Papua New Guinea: 0.233544 per 1,000 people
#12 New Zealand: 0.213383 per 1,000 people
#13 United Kingdom: 0.142172 per 1,000 people
#14 Spain: 0.140403 per 1,000 people
#15 France: 0.139442 per 1,000 people
#16 Korea, South: 0.12621 per 1,000 people
#17 Mexico: 0.122981 per 1,000 people
#18 Norway: 0.120836 per 1,000 people
#19 Costa Rica: 0.118277 per 1,000 people
#20 Venezuela: 0.115507 per 1,000 people
#21 Finland: 0.110856 per 1,000 people
#22 Netherlands: 0.100445 per 1,000 people
#23 Denmark: 0.0914948 per 1,000 people
#24 Germany: 0.0909731 per 1,000 people
#25 Bulgaria: 0.0795973 per 1,000 people
#26 Chile: 0.0782179 per 1,000 people
#27 Thailand: 0.0626305 per 1,000 people
#28 Kyrgyzstan: 0.0623785 per 1,000 people
#29 Poland: 0.062218 per 1,000 people
#30 Sri Lanka: 0.0599053 per 1,000 people
#31 Hungary: 0.0588588 per 1,000 people
#32 Estonia: 0.0547637 per 1,000 people
#33 Ireland: 0.0542829 per 1,000 people
#34 Switzerland: 0.0539458 per 1,000 people
#35 Belarus: 0.0514563 per 1,000 people
#36 Uruguay: 0.0512295 per 1,000 people
#37 Lithuania: 0.0508757 per 1,000 people
#38 Malaysia: 0.0505156 per 1,000 people
#39 Romania: 0.0497089 per 1,000 people
#40 Czech Republic: 0.0488234 per 1,000 people
#41 Russia: 0.0486543 per 1,000 people
#42 Latvia: 0.0454148 per 1,000 people
#43 Moldova: 0.0448934 per 1,000 people
#44 Colombia: 0.0433254 per 1,000 people
#45 Slovenia: 0.0427648 per 1,000 people
#46 Italy: 0.0402045 per 1,000 people
#47 Portugal: 0.0364376 per 1,000 people
#48 Tunisia: 0.0331514 per 1,000 people
#49 Zambia: 0.0266383 per 1,000 people
#50 Ukraine: 0.0244909 per 1,000 people
#51 Slovakia: 0.0237525 per 1,000 people
#52 Mauritius: 0.0219334 per 1,000 people
#53 Turkey: 0.0180876 per 1,000 people
#54 Japan: 0.017737 per 1,000 people
#55 Hong Kong: 0.0150746 per 1,000 people
#56 India: 0.0143187 per 1,000 people
#57 Qatar: 0.0139042 per 1,000 people
#58 Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of: 0.0132029 per 1,000 people
#59 Greece: 0.0106862 per 1,000 people
#60 Georgia: 0.0100492 per 1,000 people
#61 Armenia: 0.00938652 per 1,000 people
#62 Indonesia: 0.00567003 per 1,000 people
#63 Yemen: 0.0038597 per 1,000 people
#64 Azerbaijan: 0.00379171 per 1,000 people
#65 Saudi Arabia: 0.00329321 per 1,000 people
Weighted average: 0.1 per 1,000 people

**Feckless** · 17th-October-2008

Oh my....I didn´t screw up the numbers just had a typo. And after calculating a bit yesterday, nothing has changed. Great. Anyhow I added lifetime calculation and just wanted to show some previous calculation I did in an older post. Good to keep information together:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry Deutsch

First of all, do you realize that the number you're presenting is an annual number, whereas the numbers from Koss' survey are lifetime numbers? It's not legitimate to directly compare the two. (If I say one out of 10 Americans goes skiing sometime in their life, you can't disprove that by showing that only one out of 50 Americans went skiing in 2007.)

That said, it's true that the Justice Department annual national crime victimization survey (NCVS) finds lower rates than studies that have been designed to measure rape accurately -- such as the rape prevalence studies that have been designed and run by the Justice Department. Most researchers believe that the NCVS underestimates rape prevalence, for a few reasons (insufficient questions, lack of privacy for people being interviewed, contextual problems, etc).

I am aware of that. I must admit I haven´t read the Koss study but logic tells me if she presents lifetime numbers she has a) calculated them or b) asked very old women (wasn´t this a study on a campus?).

So let me use my inferior math skills. Lets assume the rate stays roughly arround 0,8 per 1000 (I added 0,3 to the last number given). The average women lives 80 years, the study covers everything above year 12 so lets say 80-12=68. That would make 54,4 per 1000 = 5,44% = 1 in 18.5 (Almost the same number you had on rapists). Now there are a few errors in there (those were overall rapes so males are in there, too) but I don´t think I am too far out there with those numbers. And don´t get me wrong this is too f*cking much (every rape is, as a brother and father of a little daughter I take those extremly serious), it just shows us that the 1 in 4 number quite a few feminists use (for rape) is way too high. To be fair you didn´t use this number.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry Deutsch

I'd have to see more of the studies you refer to about male victimization. I don't think those studies are directly comparable to Koss' rape figure, since they include sexual activity such as being involuntarily kissed, which certainly wouldn't count as "rape" by the standards of Koss' study.

That said, I don't doubt that there have been men raped by women.

I posted the studies to show that if you use certain criteria there are a whole lot of boys out there who got assaulted. In a way probably matching the 1 in 4 on the female side (I have no study at hand but I assume those criteria were alike).

Furthermore if we look at the trend of the rape victim statistic (1980 -> 2,5 / 1990 -> 1,7 / 2000 -> 0,6 / 2005 -> 0,5) we must ask ourselves it the Koss study from the 80s is still reliable. I think that comming forward nowadays is much easier than in the 80s (even so easy that some sources say false rape accusation are "common" (http://www.mediaradar.org/alert20070423.php) nowadays) so the trend should even look better if we take that into account.

Stan that are some useful informations. Thanks!

Oh and this is one important thing I added to the above

Table 2: Rates per 1.000[code]
Both Female Male
Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rape/Assault 191.670 0,8 176.540 1,4 15.130 0,1
-Rape 69.370 0,3 66.670 0,5 2.700 0,0
-Assault 61.530 0,3 61.530 0,5 0 0,0
-Att. Rape 60.770 0,2 48.340 0,4 12.430 0,1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall crime 5.400.790 22,1 2.273.320 18,1 3.127.470 26,3
[/code]This is the most important table. I will use the red numbers (115.010 - what is sexual assault? Touching in the subway?) to determine the percentage of male rapist. Sadly the table for race mixes numbers on rape and assault, so I am assuming that all races are roughly comitting same number of rape and attempted rape. On the above notice that there were no prisoners asked (thats a good one, so the gouvernment doesn´t have to deal with females that are no longer the biggest victim of sexual violence + the uncomfortable truth about prison rape (more than 100.000 rapes)). Also note that males are more often the victim in EVERY other crime except the sexual ones.

**Feckless** · 17th-October-2008

Rape victims (most recent) by country

#1 New Zealand:1.3%
#2 Austria:1.2%
#3 Finland:1.1%
#4 Sweden:1.1%
#5 Australia:1%
#6 United Kingdom:0.9%
#7 Netherlands:0.8%
#8 Canada:0.8%
#9 Slovenia:0.8%
#10 France:0.7%
#11 Italy:0.6%
#12 Switzerland:0.6%
#13 Denmark:0.4%
#14 United States:0.4%
#15 Saint Kitts and Nevis:0.3%
#16 Belgium:0.3%
#17 Poland:0.2%
#18 Portugal:0.2%
#19 Japan:0.1%
#20 Malta:0.1%

Weighted average: 0.6%

Rapes (most recent) by country

#1 United States:95,136
#2 South Africa:52,425
#3 Canada:24,350
#4 Australia:15,630
#5 India:15,468
#6 Mexico:14,373
#7 United Kingdom:13,395
#8 Germany:8,615
#9 France:8,458
#10 Russia:6,978
#11 Korea, South:6,139
#12 Peru:5,968
#13 Spain:5,664
#14 Zimbabwe:5,567
#15 Thailand:4,020
#16 Argentina:3,036
#17 Venezuela:2,931
#18 Italy:2,543
#19 Belgium:2,436
#20 Japan:2,357
#21 Poland:2,345
#22 Sweden:2,184
#23 Colombia:1,861
#24 Netherlands:1,801
#25 Chile:1,402
#26 Indonesia:1,372
#27 Jamaica:1,304
#28 Papua New Guinea:1,295
#29 Turkey:1,260
#30 Romania:1,253
#31 Malaysia:1,210
#32 Sri Lanka:1,202
#33 Ukraine:1,151
#34 New Zealand:1,059
#35 Morocco:1,015
#36 Bolivia:928
#37 Belarus:853
#38 El Salvador:842
#39 Czech Republic:653
#40 Costa Rica:633
#41 Austria:625
#42 Hungary:598
#43 Bulgaria:593
#44 Norway:555
#45 Finland:551
#46 Denmark:500
#47 Switzerland:484
#48 Portugal:433
#49 Kyrgyzstan:321
#50 Tunisia:306
#51 Uruguay:303
#52 Zambia:300
#53 Namibia:286
#54 Burma:223
#55 Ireland:218
#56 Panama:212
#57 Moldova:204
#58 Lithuania:188
#59 Slovakia:171
#60 Croatia:165
#61 Nepal:158
#62 Oman:115
#63 Greece:114
#64 Latvia:106
#65 Hong Kong:104
#66 Slovenia:98
#67 Yemen:80
#68 Iceland:74
#69 Estonia:73
#70 Seychelles:64
#71 Saudi Arabia:59
#72 Georgia:47
#73 Albania:45
#74 Luxembourg:39
#75 Azerbaijan:39
#76 Armenia:28
#77 Mauritius:27
#78 Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of:27
#79 Dominica:24
#80 Cyprus:13
#81 Qatar:12
#82 Montserrat:7
#83 Malta:5
#84 Maldives:2

Total: 329,708
Weighted average: 3,925.1

All from here....
http://www.nationmaster.com/cat/cri-crime&all=1
thx Stan!

**Feckless** · 8th-November-2008

From the post I deleted one interesting note:

Homicides can be broken into four categories by gender of offender and victim. Here is the breakdown for murders committed in 1999:

Male offender /Male victim 65.1%
Male offender /Female victim 22.4%
Female offender /Male victim 10.1%
Female offender /Female victim 2.4%

Source: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, "Homicide Trends in the U.S.,"

Now assume we have 10 victims:
8 male victims
2 female victims killed by males
1 male victim killed by a female
(rounded values)