lovely statistics.. very interesting!!

FFFF · #1 18th-October-2007

http://christianparty.net/divorceworld.htm

FFFF · #2 18th-October-2007

Feminists complain that patriarchy abuses women.

Women in Japan who "endure" the world's most successful patriarchy today, compared to women in the feminized US, have one tenth the chance of getting divorced, one fifth the chance of being raped, one fourth the chance of being murdered, 1/28th the chance of being robbed, 1/55th the chance of being assaulted, 1/20th the chance of having their cars stolen, 1/12th the chance of being arrested for drug abuse, 1/220th the chance of being the victim of an armed robbery, & 1/14th the chance of going to prison. Their families save a third of their incomes every year (compared to zero in the US), their family incomes with ONE working parent are an average of twice that of US families with mostly 2 working parents, their children score 105 points higher than ours on the TIMSS Math test, their husbands live an average of 4 years longer than US husbands, and they live an average of 2 1/2 years longer than US women.
Japan's government costs the average worker 22 cents of each wage dollar (vs. our 42 cents), resolves 92% of its murders (vs. our 66%), spends half as much as a percent of GDP on education, has one person on death row (vs. our 2,124), and requires 1/60th as many lawyers to accomplish all of that.

FFFF · #3 18th-October-2007

ADULTERY AND ABORTION
American men don't ask much of their women. They know that men constitute 95% of our ponderous prison population and women only 5%, even though women are 58 to 234 times more likely to murder their children than fathers--but they do nothing. They know that the high accident rate of women causes the deaths of an additional 6,200 men annually in traffic accidents, giving us a motor vehicle fatality rate almost three times higher than England--but they do nothing. They know that women pilots are four times more likely than men pilots to crash--but they do nothing. They know that women are five times more likely than men to be acquitted of the same crime, that they are 16% less likely to be convicted if tried for the same crime, that men receive prison sentences 2.7 times longer than women for the same crime, that wives are twice as likely as husbands to initiate a contract to kill their spouse--but they do nothing. They know that American men are 1,000 times more likely than Japanese men or Italian men or Greek men to be accused, tried, and convicted of rape, and that half of those convicted don't even match the DNA evidence from the "crime scene"--but they do nothing. They know that women own 65% of the wealth in the nation even though men earn 43% more than women, and that men are 99.993% of the battle deaths in the wars we have fought, and women only 0.007%--but they are content with that.
All they ask is that married women bear their husband's children!
That's all!

But in the name of "women's rights" they killed 40 million babies in the womb, 20 million of whom were females.

Observe the fingers of a baby in the womb holding the finger of a surgeon, and then tell me about "my body, my choice".

As bad as that is, far worse is cheating on their husbands so frequently that 12.6 million children are subjected to the shame, social pathologies, and stigma of not even being biologically linked to their own putative fathers.
And worse than that? 12.6 million men [not fathers] who were STUPID enough to trust women enough to marry them and believe that their oaths to God to honor and obey them would be upheld, who were forced to pay to raise their mailman's or gardener's children while they were robbed of their heritage and their heirs.
If this 12.6 million adulterous women were to be punished as the Holy Bible demands that they be and as they should be to bring this practice to a halt, rather than men being 95% of two million prison inmates, women would be 86% of the 14.6 million inmates--except that punishing wives who commit adultery REDUCES crime, and prevents women from committing adultery, and would leave far less than 2 million men in prison.

FFFF · #4 18th-October-2007

World Divorce Rates
"The US began keeping fairly careful statistics on divorce beginning in 1867. From 1867-1929, the number of divorces steadily increased, from 9,937 in 1867, to 201,468 in 1929."
During this time, the population of the US increased from 37 to 122 million, so the divorce rate per 100,000 population increased six fold, from 26.8 to 165

The US has the world's highest divorce rate, bar none--twice as high as the next highest country (Sweden) and 50 times higher than some countries.

It increased 50 fold since the feminists met in Seneca Falls, 40% in just one year in California, it parallelled a four fold increase in federal spending as a percent of GDP, & it gave us the world's highest incarceration rate

Professor John Lott proved that the Nineteenth Amendment is the sole reason for the "unexplained" rapid growth of government which destabilized families and increased divorce and illegitimacy.

Each 100 additional divorces worldwide causes two additional suicides, one additional murder, 6 additional rapes, 33 additional armed robberies, and puts another 100 men in prison.

Twelve scholarly studies prove that divorce increases the premature mortality rates of fathers, mothers, and the children of divorce.

It is feminists and public servants who are morally responsibile for this reprehensible social policy.

Source: http://www.members.xoom.com/fmanifesto/divorceworld.xls

Country
Divorces per 1,000 pop
Rapes per 1,000 pop
Murders per 1,000 pop
Armed robberies per 1,000 pop
Prison Inmates per 1,000 pop
Police Brutality per 100k pop
Death Row Inmates
US

4.95
0.372
0.084
2.21
6.8
92.5
2,797

Sweden

2.79
0.157
0.0173
0.49
1
0

Denmark

2.81
0.112
0.0517
0.44
0.65
0

Germany

1.91
0.086
0.042
0.47
0.65
0

United Kingdom

3.08
0.073
0.0197
0.63
0.85
0

Finland

1.85
0.072
0.007
0.38
0.6

Switzerland

0.77
0.062
0.0225
0.23
0.75
0

Luxembourg

1.42
0.05
0
0
1.15

Spain

0.88
0.0443
0.0228
0.85
0

Austria

0.97
0.044
0.018
0.008
1.05

Belgium

1.83
0.04
0.028
0.66
1.25
0

Greece

0.76
0.024
0.0176
0.07
0.8

Ireland

0.27
0.0172
0.0096
0.46
0.55

Japan

0.62
0.014
0.012
0.01
0.37
30

Portugal

0.88
0.012
0.045
0
0.55

China

1.03

Year Divorce RatePer1,000 PopulationGovernment Spending Percent of GDP18700.1?1900 0.386.7%1910 0.747.3%1920 1.18.6%1930 1.69.6%The decline of patriarchy begins in earnest here1940 1.814.7%1950 2.119.0%1960 2.424.0%1970 3.129.0%1980 433.0%1990 4.9541.0%19994.9043.0%Sources: US Census Bureau, Tax Foundation, US Dept. of the Treasury, Tax Foundation, Wash, DC

World Divorce Rates
While feminists blast patriarchal countries for their failure to achieve "equality", with rare exceptions those countries with patriarchal values have low divorce rates, low government spending, and growing, healthy economies and societies. Every country which has experimented with "equality" has experienced a rapid implosion of both its economy and its social stability.

Sources: International Monetary Fund, UN Statistical Summary, & Census Bureau

Country

Divorce Rate per 10,000 Population

National Budget as a Percent of GDP

Patriarchy or Matriarchy
SriLanka
0.015
6.7%
Patriarchy
Brazil
0.026
13.9%
Patriarchy
Italy
0.027
40.4%
Patriarchy
Mexico
0.033
7.2%
Patriarchy
Chile
0.038
11.5%
Patriarchy
ElSalvador
0.041
6.3%
Patriarchy
Japan
0.042
15.2%
Patriarchy
Ecuador
0.042
4.5%
Patriarchy
Mauritius
0.047
7.0%
Patriarchy
Thailand
0.058
6.9%
Patriarchy
Syria
0.065
11.6%
Patriarchy
Panama
0.068
16.4%
Patriarchy
China
0.079
16.8%
Patriarchy
Tunisia
0.082
16.0%
Patriarchy
Korea
0.088
12.9%
Patriarchy
Trinidad
0.097
15.4%
Patriarchy
Barbados
0.121
28.2%
Patriarchy
Finland
0.185
49.6%
Matriarchy
Canada
0.246
19.9%
Matriarchy
Australia
0.252
27.1%
Matriarchy
NewZealand
0.263
28.7%
Matriarchy
Denmark
0.281
58.3%
Matriarchy
UnitedKingdom
0.308
40.9%
Matriarchy
Russia
0.336
44.4%
Matriarchy
PuertoRico
0.447
41.0%
Matriarchy
US
0.495
41.0%
Matriarchy

The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia:

Matriarchy; familial and political rule by women. Many anthropologists now reject the claims of Lewis MORGAN and others that early society was matriarchal, although some contemporary feminists have theorized that a primitive matriarchy once existed. Claims for such a matriarchy are based largely on research on societies in which women are the major contributors to subsistence, on societies with matrilineal descent, and on myths of ancient female rule. Such societies and myths have many aspects, however, that cast doubt on the validity of the claims. Most anthropologists have also concluded that patriarchy, or male dominance, is not natural or biological but culturally constructed because of the diverse forms it takes across cultures.

The American Heritage Dictionary

pa·tri·ar·chy (p³“tr¶-är”k¶)n. pl. pa·tri·ar·chies

1. A social system in which the father is the head of the family and descent is traced through the father's side of the family.

2. A family, community, or society based on this system or governed by men. Also Called patriarchate.

One reason matriarchies don't survive is because societies can't afford to operate them. Already, US Public Debt, which was non-existent prior to the rise of feminism, is almost more than GDP.

YearPublic Debt Billions of DollarsGDP Less Public Debt Billions of Dollars18702.418802 18901.119001.219101.1192024193016The Decline of Patriarchy Begins in Earnest Here1940431950256301960284231197037064519809081,8241990 3,2332,33420005,8003,00020058,0002,000

At current rates of growth, Public Debt will exceed GDP by 5 fold in 34 years. But current Congressional debates will increase this RATE of growth. If we can find a matriarchal society which has proven to be a workable system, then let's continue our experiment with it. But if we can't, then isn't it time to end this costly venture?
For the sake of our children, for the survival of our economy, and for the fathers whose children need them, it is time to put an end to "victim ideology", and demand that the "father" be placed back in the "family".

The high US divorce rate is the crowning achievement of feminism, the "right to commit adultery", an abomination before God

US government spending already exceeds the combined federal spending of France, Germany, England, Spain, Italy, Japan, China, Taiwan, Singapore, Korea, Russia, Sweden, & Australia.
A review and analysis of the skyrocketing US divorce rate, parallelling a corresponding increase in government spending as a percent of GDP, and a chronic drop in education and economic standing and quality suggests that US social policy needs a radical correction. As the US divorce rate climbed, government spending exceeded the combined federal spending of France, Germany, England, Spain, Italy, Japan, China, Taiwan, Singapore, Korea, Russia, Sweden, & Australia.

The combined GDPs of those countries are 37% higher than the US.

Their combined population is 6.6 times greater than the US.

The proportion of a Californian's income spent for government is 40% higher than for the Japanese.

The proportion of a Californian's income spent for government is 2.2 times higher than for the Germans..

While the percent of GDP spent for government increased more than 3 fold since the turn of the century, the divorce rate increased 10 fold.Why Fatherhood?

Marx · #5 18th-October-2007

Good stuff batman.

field marshall watkins · #6 18th-October-2007

Every country which has experimented with "equality" has experienced a rapid implosion of both its economy and its social stability.

That is because this 'equality' that they speak of is actually another name for corporatist communism. And communism is designed to collapse societies.

Good collection of info though. More ammo!