antimisandry.com  

Since November '05

EU court throws out gender pay challenge, may pay less if service length is shorter

This is a discussion on EU court throws out gender pay challenge, may pay less if service length is shorter within the Facts and Figures forums, part of the General category; EU court throws out gender pay challenge Posted 03 October 2006 @ 06:58 am EST Companies may pay women less ...


Go Back   antimisandry.com > General > Facts and Figures

►Link to us◄ Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #1  
Old 17th-March-2007
Tyrael's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Rep Power: 190761
Tyrael has a brilliant futureTyrael has a brilliant futureTyrael has a brilliant futureTyrael has a brilliant futureTyrael has a brilliant futureTyrael has a brilliant futureTyrael has a brilliant futureTyrael has a brilliant futureTyrael has a brilliant futureTyrael has a brilliant futureTyrael has a brilliant future
EU court throws out gender pay challenge, may pay less if service length is shorter

Quote:
EU court throws out gender pay challenge

Posted 03 October 2006 @ 06:58 am EST

Companies may pay women less than their male colleagues if their length of service is shorter because of taking time off to look after children, the EU's top court ruled on Tuesday in a blow for equal pay campaigners.

In a keenly awaited ruling, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) said employers did not have to justify on a case by case basis their pay structures based on the length of service, unless a worker provides evidence that raises serious doubts.

The Luxembourg based court rejected a claim by British health inspector Bernadette Cadman who had said her employer unjustifiably paid her male colleagues of the same grade more only because they had worked more years.

Cadman had argued length of service often depended on domestic circumstances such as pregnancy and maternal leave and that employers must provide special justification for paying men more than women when they hold the same post.

"Recourse to the criterion of the length of service is appropriate to attain the legitimate objective of rewarding experience acquired which enables the worker to perform his duties better," the court said in its ruling.

"There is no need to show that an individual worker has acquired experience during the relevant period which has enabled him to perform his duties better," it added.

Cadman sued Britain's Health and Safety Executive in 2001 when she discovered she was earning up to 9,000 pounds a year less than male workers in the same post.

Britain's Employment Tribunal initially ruled in her favour but an appeals court had doubts and referred the case to the ECJ which interprets pan EU legislation.

Cadman's lawyer has been quoted as saying the case was "the most important equal pay claim to be brought in the last 10 years".
Link.

This was posted before, but I repost it in this forum, because it's important news worth reading.



~ A man needs a woman like a lion needs a stove. ~

~ Women deserve only equal opportunity, not equal outcomes. ~

~ Men are not collectively "guilty" of anything. ~

~ Never needing to be pregnant is a blessing. ~

~ Feminist ideology “men have to respect women, but women have no reason to respect men” ~

~ Everybody makes choices, and nobody should be entitled to special treatment because of those choices.
Equal results based on unequal treatment amounts to no kind of equality at all. ~
 
Reply

Tags
challenge, court, eu, gender, length, pay, service, shorter, throws

Thread Tools

Anti Misandry Tools
Translate from English...
Note: the below search box will seek information from the following sources:
  • Anti misandry
  • Angry Harry
  • Stand Your Ground
Click Here to suggest other sites worthy of inclusion in the narrowed search criteria.

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Challenge: TERA Chit chat (MAIN) 53 12th-April-2008 08:00 AM
challenge to all AM regulars.. FFFF Chit chat (MAIN) 30 30th-January-2008 02:42 PM
At last! EU court throws out gender pay challenge! Rebadow Chit chat (MAIN) 2 3rd-October-2006 06:30 PM
One year's maternity leave for all mothers regardless of length of time with company Tyrael Chit chat (MAIN) 9 3rd-October-2006 05:30 PM
New challenge over school science - BBC News RSS Science 0 2nd-October-2006 01:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:19 PM.

Please help towards the costs of running this site.
We're now on a VPS (way more power)...

All content is copyright antimisandry.com 2005 - 2008