Quote:
Originally Posted by Percy  I can agree with all you say on this, Kim, apart from one item.
Apart from husbands trying to meet the requirements of the average women's reading demands while on holiday, I doubt that many men go out and buy Cosmopolitan as a choice for themselves. The sales of women's magazines are to women.
So it is more accurate to say that Cosmopolitan is an accurate reflection of the society that women want or 'women's society', not society as it is for men.
Women's magazines are produced by women for women. Women buy them and drool over them. They are vacuous pornography, designed and produced by intellectual and moral pygmies.
You show wisdom and moral strength by being scandalised by the trash. They paint women in a very bad light, which women in general are dazzled by. |
You miss the point that many of the demands women place on men originate from such magazines. Women get their ideas for the manipulation, intimidation, and subjugation of men and for their own "unbalanced" lifestyles from these magazines. So Kim is 100% correct in saying that
I think Cosmopolitan is a fairly accurate reflection of society
Women don't take the ideas presented in Cosmo, Vanity Fair, Vogue etc. and just think about them. It's not like reading Dickens. The magazines are their
training manuals on everything from how to view their bodies to how to "manage" us men. These periodicals are dangers to society.
21st-July-2008
