Sadly, that's pretty accurate kim.

TMOTS

• For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places and their handmaidens, Apathy, Sloth and Trivia. Ephesians 6:12 et Percy

The Trashing of our Military on Memorial Day by Radical Homosexualist will be remembered as a defining moment of the Abomination.

Only with the 'Greatest Generation" mostly passed on, and thus not able to voice their disgust at pandering to such sick hatreds and vile perversions, is this lobby of Hate able to push the Evil of their Pogrom on the nation.

The Hate driven Contempt of the ObamAcorn Pelosicrats for our Veterans has led to their attempts to silence them, and instead push the propaganda of the pervert / hatemonger lobby through a bought and paid for 'free press' that in itself is no longer worth defending.

By Trashing the Military and Veterans, and pimping the armed forces to an alliance of Dyke Misandry (defined by their Hatred of Men, Masculinity and Normal Heterosexuality) and Homo-Anal Coprophile Perversions, the left hopes to alienate the people from the military and thus follow the lead of the National Homo-Socialist Third Reich (founded by a Boy Raping Homo-Anal Copophile Ernst Rohm who led the homosex terrorist 'Storm Troopers' and his protege Hitler) and take over by driving out those who fail to pander to their hatreds.
In an essay that is both timely and telling, Bryan Fischer has provided greater detail and insight and I recommend it to all who want to know the Truth behind the Hollywerid Homosex Propaganda Spin of out lamestream media.

Ohso.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Homosexuality, Hitler and 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'
5/27/2010 By Bryan Fischer http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/100528
The bottom line from what follows is this:
Homosexuality gave us Adolph Hitler, and homosexuals in the military gave us the Brown Shirts, the Nazi war machine and six million dead Jews. Gays in the military is an experiment that has been tried and found disastrously and tragically wanting. Maybe it's time for Congress to learn a lesson from history.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>

Group Representing 2.5M Wartime Veterans to Congress: Keep 'Don't Ask'
House may vote Thursday evening to repeal ban

INDIANAPOLIS, May 27, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In letters to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Minority Leader John Boehner, the head of the nation's largest wartime veterans organization, stated his group's opposition to repealing the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) policy banning homosexuals from serving openly in the military. The House may vote to repeal that policy as early as Thursday evening.

Homosexualist activists have been pushing for the Senate Armed Services Committee to attach a repeal of the ban to the annual defense spending bill. This would secure a repeal before several Democrats are expected to lose their seats in the November elections. However, the move has been criticized as underhanded, as it would pass before a Pentagon study on the effects of a repeal had time to be completed.

The House of Representatives may vote Thursday evening on whether to include the ban in their own version of the defense bill.

"We feel strongly that the current policy has served the U.S. military well for 17 years and it would not be wise to make a major cultural change in the middle of two wars," The American Legion National Commander Clarence E. Hill wrote to the House leaders earlier this month. "Moreover, the Department of Defense has already directed a study on the policy and it would be premature to act before the commission conducting the study releases its findings."

"Under current policy, men and women are already allowed to serve their country regardless of their sexual preference. Allowing homosexual members to announce their preference within the ranks could jeopardize the unit cohesion which is so essential to military success," said Hill, a retired U.S. Navy captain and veteran of the Gulf War.

"The military is a unique environment, in which DADT has worked well, without diminishing our nation's war-fighting capability," Hill continued. "Indeed, the core purpose of our military is to fight and win our nation's wars. Enacting any law that does not enhance the military's ability to accomplish that mission would be detrimental to the security of our nation. We believe that the repeal of DADT would be such an action."

The American Legion claims a current membership of 2.5 million wartime veterans.

In a press conference Tuesday, other top military officials, including the former chief of the Pentagon's Criminal Law Division, strongly urged retention of the ban.

See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

Homosexuals In Military Three Times More Likely to Sexually Assault Than Straights: Survey

1. Johann Hari: The Strange, Strange Story of the Gay Fascists
   The twisted truth is that gay men have been at the heart of every major fascist movement that ever was - including the gay-gassing, *-cidal Third Reich. ...
2. http://digg.com/world_news/Johann_Hari_The_Strange_Strange_Story_of_the_Gay_F ascists

I'm remembering our veterans, gay or not. Ohso...is it really imperative that you spread your anti-gay hate agenda even here on this particular thread..?

Ah yes Memorial Day.
It's not really a day to cook out, but a day to mourn the women and Mostly men in the millions who've died for our country.

It's also a day to appreciate the soldiers who came home from Vietnam only to be stab in the back and cursed by a bunch of brainless drug abusing trollops and effete liars who partied themselves to an early grave.

Using Memorial Day to Trash the Military and our Veterans is simply another sickening example of the rank raw Hatred of the Radical Gender Feminist / Homosexualist Misandry Machine - is there nothing they won't soil with their homo-anal coprophile perversions and Dyke separatist exterminationist bigotry?

Probably Not

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>
Conservative media fiddle while the military burns
Robert Knight - Guest Columnist - 5/28/2010

Barney Frank and his friends are rolling their tanks through Congress while everyone is talking about something else. As we reel from one crisis to the next, homosexual activists and their allies are muscling through their agenda, with nary a peep from the nation's conservative talking heads.

This week, their target is the military. Soon, it will be passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would criminalize traditional morality in every workplace with 15 or more employees. After that, they will try to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act. Finally, they aim to pass an "anti-bullying" law that will threaten schools with losing federal funds if they refuse to force kids to read Heather Has Two Mommies and Gloria Goes to Gay Pride. The agenda is breathtakingly ambitious, and would be unimaginable to previous generations.

These radical laws would be a watershed moment for socialists, who are at war with family and religion as impediments to a growing state. The pansexual Left senses triumph now for two reasons:
First, the Obama-manufactured crisis-a-day has people terrified about where the economy is headed. The sheer magnitude of government takeovers and spending is dominating the Tea Party movement, and in fact, everybody.

Second, homosexual activists and their media enablers have "jammed" the public debate. Hollywood, educators and the media continually deny the truth about homosexuality – that while all people are made in God's image and are entitled to basic human rights – homosexuality is not in-born, is changeable, and is dangerous to the health and well being of individuals, families and communities. The militant advancement of gay activism poses the greatest threat to the freedoms of religion, assembly and speech within our borders.

Why aren't more Americans properly concerned? You can have gay relatives, friends and colleagues and still understand that promoting sodomy as an affirmative action "right" is not a good thing. Americans used to get that. Perhaps the lack of resolve is because many conservative opinion leaders have run for the tall grass on this issue. By omitting it, they're saying it really isn't important.

When was the last time you heard a frank discussion about this on any of the top conservative talk shows, either on radio or television? Michael Savage is the only prominent talk show host to take it on, and he does it from Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco. How about Erick Erickson's estimable Red State Morning Briefing? It's vital, on-line reading, and I urge everyone to subscribe. And yet, while we're on the verge of Congress' raping the military to please a tiny, leftist lobby, the topic is nowhere to be found on Red State this week. Similarly, with a few exceptions, GOP leaders have been silent.

The gravity of allowing open homosexuality in the military cannot be overstated.
It has the potential of destroying the all-volunteer force by discouraging recruitment and retention and shattering unit morale. Chaplains would find themselves muzzled on basic questions of morality and many would leave the services.
Recruits would undergo pro-homosexual "sensitivity" training. The already troubling problem of sexual misconduct would increase.

A 1993 report by the chief criminal investigator of the Army summarized 102 cases of homosexual misconduct in the army between 1989 and 1992. Twenty-nine of the incidents occurred in the barracks. Forty-nine incidents involved children. Five involved HIV-positive offenders. Nine occurred in either latrines or showers. Thirty-one cases involved soldiers with "a significant variance in pay grade," such as sergeants preying on enlisted men. And this was during a time when the ban was in effect, including the question at induction, and before Clinton watered down the 1993 law with "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." That law, by the way, which Congress passed overwhelmingly, explicitly bars people with the "propensity" to engage in homosexuality.

Reports like the above, and the astronomically higher incidences of sexually transmitted diseases like HIV among homosexual men, are ignored in any discussions of whether to lift the ban. Instead, the rhetoric of the civil rights movement is employed, as if being black or Hispanic or white is on a par with acting out homosexual desires. Unlike skin color or ethnicity, sex is inextricably tied to behavior, character and morality.
Thus, the "civil rights" arguments are absurdly inapplicable. How about the civil rights of service people who will be forced to co-habit with those who might view them as sex objects? They can't just "go home" at night. And no one has made the case that adding homosexuality to the mix will improve military readiness. The best they can do is say that they'll try to minimize the damage.

From misreporting junk science about non-existent "gay genes," to bashing people who believe that some behavior is simply wrong and unhealthy, the media are a fully owned subsidiary of the gay activist movement. They march in lockstep according to the dictates of the 1989 gay strategy manual After the Ball, which describes in detail how to vilify anyone who disagrees.

The liberal media might be expected to reject what God and common sense tell us about sexuality. But there is no excuse for the conservative brain trust to ignore this threat. If the gay rights activists get everything they want, thus transforming morality itself into a form of bigotry actionable under the law, we will see the criminalization of Christianity.

It's already happening in Great Britain, Scandinavia and in Canada, where the perversion of civil rights has led to Christians being hauled before human rights commissions for merely expressing a traditionalist view of sexual morality in public. And it's begun in the U.S. as well, with the Boy Scouts being thrown out of schools, parks and United Way chapters, and a Christian couple fined by the New Mexico Human Rights Commission for declining to photograph a lesbian civil union ceremony. In New Jersey, the state removed the tax exemption for a Methodist seaside gazebo because the church did not want it used for same-sex ceremonies contrary to biblical morality. Equal Employment Opportunity Commissioner Chai Feldblum has said in reference to gay rights, "I'm having a hard time coming up with any case in which religious liberty should win."

The military is a linchpin for all of society. It is a bastion of traditional values. Former communist David Horowitz recalls that during the '60s, radical leftists determined that if they could destroy the U.S. military, they could destabilize the rest of capitalist America. Two things could accomplish this, they said: Putting women into combat, and opening the armed forces to homosexuality.

Even for non-religious Americans, the strategy – and threat – ought to be clear. It's time to get over fears of being called a "bigot," and to stand up for what's right for our military servicemen and women – and our country.

If conservative opinion leaders won't talk about this, how will the rest of the country rally to defeat this leftist goal? We still can, but the hour is late.

Thank you Kim that is a very fitting picture. And just one of numerous wonderful quotes from David O.McKay.

Quote from chevalier

Thank you Kim that is a very fitting picture. And just one of numerous wonderful quotes from David O.McKay.

Holy moly, Chev! I was just thinking about you today! How are you?

I am passable I suppose. But then Veterans day and Memorial day are always a bit rough on me. I was thinking of all of you too.

For some reason I just felt I should check in. I have missed most of you lol. Just kidding. I hope to be back soon but don't go holding your breath on that. Many blessings to you all. Robert.

I see Obama didn't bother to lay a wreath. He had to be elsewhere.

What was that he said as his campaign slogan? - "Yes we Can."

Hah !

Can you imagine the dismay if the Queen and members of the Royal Family didn't bother to turn up at the Cenotaph on Nov 11th.

Quote from Percy

I see Obama didn't bother to lay a wreath. He had to be elsewhere.

What was that he said as his campaign slogan? - "Yes we Can."

Hah !

Can you imagine the dismay if the Queen and members of the Royal Family didn't bother to turn up at the Cenotaph on Nov 11th.

Exactly.. each action by this boob furthers my discust with him....

TMOTS

Quote from chevalier

I am passable I suppose. But then Veterans day and Memorial day are always a bit rough on me. I was thinking of all of you too.

For some reason I just felt I should check in. I have missed most of you lol. Just kidding. I hope to be back soon but don't go holding your breath on that. Many blessings to you all. Robert.

Well, I'm glad you stopped in, regardless. I hope yesterday wasn't too bad for you and please remember that you have friends here and that you are thought of and missed.

Quote from chevalier

I am passable I suppose. But then Veterans day and Memorial day are always a bit rough on me. I was thinking of all of you too.

For some reason I just felt I should check in. I have missed most of you lol. Just kidding. I hope to be back soon but don't go holding your breath on that. Many blessings to you all. Robert.

Hope things are okay Chev. I guess it's hard for you to ever forget your service, since you carry the reminders in your body.

God Bless