antimisandry.com  

Since November '05

H. Con. Res. 241

This is a discussion on H. Con. Res. 241 within the Equal but Different forums, part of the Blogging Hub category; Coming shortly on the heels of the unanimous passing of House Bill 474, "Recognizing the immeasurable contributions of fathers in ...


Go Back   antimisandry.com > Blogging Hub > Equal but Different

►Link to us◄ Register FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #1  
Old 31st-May-2008
Kim's Avatar
Kim Kim is offline
America
Supporter
 
Rep Power: 1699340
Kim has a brilliant futureKim has a brilliant futureKim has a brilliant futureKim has a brilliant futureKim has a brilliant futureKim has a brilliant futureKim has a brilliant futureKim has a brilliant futureKim has a brilliant futureKim has a brilliant futureKim has a brilliant future
H. Con. Res. 241

Coming shortly on the heels of the unanimous passing of House Bill 474, "Recognizing the immeasurable contributions of fathers in the healthy development of children...." (yes, we are checking now to see if Hell has, indeed, frozen over), comes the following bill.


H. Con. Res. 241: Expressing the support for the enacting of joint custody laws for fit parents, so that more...
Bill Status
Introduced: Oct 25, 2007
Sponsor: Rep. Roscoe Bartlett [R-MD]
Status: Introduced
Go to Bill Status Page

You are viewing the following version of this bill:

Introduced in House: This is the original text of the bill as it was written by its sponsor and submitted to the House for consideration.

Text of Legislation
HCON 241 IH


110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. CON. RES. 241
Expressing the support for the enacting of joint custody laws for fit parents, so that more children are raised with the benefits of having a father and a mother in their lives.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES


October 25, 2007

Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland (for himself and Mr. ABERCROMBIE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the support for the enacting of joint custody laws for fit parents, so that more children are raised with the benefits of having a father and a mother in their lives.

Whereas, in approximately 84 percent of the cases where a parent is absent, that parent is the father;

Whereas if current trends continue, half of all children born today will live apart from one of their parents, usually their father, at some point before they turn 18 years old;

Whereas when families (whether intact or with a parent absent) are living in poverty, a significant factor is the father's lack of job skills;

Whereas committed and responsible fathering during infancy and early childhood contributes to the development of emotional security, curiosity, and math and verbal skills;

Whereas an estimated 19,400,000 children (27 percent) live apart from their biological fathers;

Whereas 40 percent of the children under age 18 not living with their biological fathers had not seen their fathers even once in the past 12 months, according to national survey data;

Whereas single parents are to be commended for the tremendous job that they do with their children;

Whereas the United States needs to encourage responsible parenting, by both fathers and mothers whenever possible;

Whereas the United States needs to encourage both parents (and extended families) to be actively involved in children's lives;

Whereas a way to do that is to encourage joint custody so that parents share children;

Whereas the American Bar Association found in 1997 that 19 States plus the District of Columbia had some form of presumption for joint custody, either legal, physical, or both, and since then, 13 additional States have added some form of presumption, bringing the current total to 32 States plus the District of Columbia;

Whereas Census Bureau data shows a correlation between joint custody and a higher payment of financial child support;

Whereas social science literature shows that children are generally well adjusted in an intact family with 2 parents in the home, and research also shows that for children of divorced, separated, and never-married parents, joint custody is strongly associated with positive outcomes for children on important measures of adjustment and well-being;

Whereas research by the Department of Health and Human Services shows that the States with the highest amount of joint custody subsequently had the lowest divorce rate; and

Whereas parents with joint custody pay 50 percent more in child support than parents with visitation only or no contact with the child: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That Congress expresses support of the States passing joint custody laws for fit parents, so that more children are raised with the benefit of having a father and a mother in their lives, careful to protect victims of domestic violence, abuse, neglect, children from potential kidnapping by a parent.



Wow. While this bill has yet to be passed and is currently stuck in committee, it's very encouraging to see other bills being passed that recognize the invaluable and irreplaceable contribution of fathers and bills being submitted that recommend actual action being taken to promote and protect the role of fathers.

Lukeskywalker on Antimisandry.com has done some admirable activist work and has an online petition in favor of passing this legislation.

Here's the link to the petition

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/urg...he-enacting-of


Please, please take the time to add your signature and, if possible, to forward this on to everyone you know. If we can't eradicate divorce and the instances of children being raised in broken homes, at least we can do our part to try and insure that children have the benefit of their fathers in their lives.

Did you read this part?

Whereas 40 percent of the children under age 18 not living with their
biological fathers had not seen their fathers even once in the past 12 months,
according to national survey data;

In instances where the mother has custody, nearly half of all children haven't seen their fathers in a year.....what a sad, disturbing statistic.

Here's the link to Luke's antimisandry.com post. He's also included some great samply e-mails that can be used to send to our representatives voicing support for this bill.

http://antimisandry.com/important_em...on-t11265.html

More...



"I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand. It's when you know you're licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what. You rarely win, but sometimes you do."

- Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird


http://equalbutdifferent.blogspot.com/
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #2  
Old 1st-June-2008
Percy's Avatar
Australia
A Knackered Old Knight.
 
Rep Power: 96887
Percy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant future
Re: H. Con. Res. 241

Great, Kim.

The ripples spread.



I have tried all my life to leave the place better than I found it.
But there are 6 billion other buggers out there messing it up.
I am outnumbered.
But...
YOU don't just make a difference,
you make THE difference.

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #3  
Old 2nd-June-2008
Australia
Established Member
 
Rep Power: 212600
shaazam has a brilliant futureshaazam has a brilliant futureshaazam has a brilliant futureshaazam has a brilliant futureshaazam has a brilliant futureshaazam has a brilliant futureshaazam has a brilliant futureshaazam has a brilliant futureshaazam has a brilliant futureshaazam has a brilliant futureshaazam has a brilliant future
Re: H. Con. Res. 241

the fact that such a resolution is passed it begs the question

wasn't this obvious and what has passed for par to this time


This web site is financed partly through advertising. To help keep this site alive you may wish to peruse our sponsors. Clicking them will open in a new window. To lower the amount of advertisements you see, register for an account and enjoy a more enriched experience.

 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
  #4  
Old 2nd-June-2008
KellyMac's Avatar
Supporter
 
Rep Power: 856371
KellyMac has a brilliant futureKellyMac has a brilliant futureKellyMac has a brilliant futureKellyMac has a brilliant futureKellyMac has a brilliant futureKellyMac has a brilliant futureKellyMac has a brilliant futureKellyMac has a brilliant futureKellyMac has a brilliant futureKellyMac has a brilliant futureKellyMac has a brilliant future
Re: H. Con. Res. 241

I think the starting point for negotiations generally at this time is sole custody with visitation, and the starting point should be joint custody. In my state we only have joint custody if both parents agree to it up front.


 
Reply

Tags
241, blog, con, res

Thread Tools

Anti Misandry Tools
Translate from English...
Note: the below search box will seek information from the following sources:
  • Anti misandry
  • Angry Harry
  • Stand Your Ground
Click Here to suggest other sites worthy of inclusion in the narrowed search criteria.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 PM.

Please help towards the costs of running this site.
We're now on a VPS (way more power)...

All content is copyright antimisandry.com 2005 - 2008