I was reading through the blog, Rex Patriarch, when I saw a comment I just had to respond to. It would appear that the blog owner has disabled comments to anyone who isn't a team member, SO, since I can't stand to let such distortion and misandry go without responding......here is the comment along with my response to it.

Prepare yourself for an example of feminist indoctrination at it's finest.

http://rexpatriarch.blogspot.com/200...ant-truce.html

julianreal said...

I think we all know what happened and is still happening to Indigenous people all over the planet: white men and our values, industries, and institutions are killing them, genocidally. And white men are also systematically raping Indigenous women. See this for more:

http://www.indiancountry.com/content.cfm?id=1096415046

What is your humanitarian response to these atrocities?

In what institutions, in what social venues, in what regions of North America, in your view, do "women rule over men"? I am eager to hear your answer.

As for where men get to speak like this: have you looked at the pornography industry in the last thirtyfive years; men have been putting down women there in every conceivable way, degrading women, raping women, pretending to rape women, cumming on women's faces, gang-banging women, treating women of color like sh*t in particularly
racist and misogynist ways. Often and routinely over these many years, the pornographers (I'm here I'm talking about the big fellas: the white corporate pimps, not someone at home alone or with a partner using their webcam) make feminists and feminism the targets of this scorn, contempt, and defamation: that's a multi-billion dollar a year industry. I ask this in earnestness: can you name for me one multi-billion dollar a year industry that promotes (accurately) the perspectives of radical feminists? Because I can't, and I've looked.

Practically every woman I know has been seriously harmed physically, emotionally, and sexually by a man or by several men, often within their own families of origin: I'm not a youngster, and this means dozens and dozens of women, just those women to whom I am personally connected. One woman friend was molested by three different men over one summer when she was nine years old. Another woman was raped by her father, older brothers, and male cousins when she was a girl. My female dental hygienist was murdered by her ex-boyfriend; he came to her home when she was alone and killed her.

I also know boys who have been raped or molested or assaulted by men: again, their numbers are in the dozens, but approximately half as large as the population of females harmed by men in these ways.

Do you know even five women who have been charged with rape, incest, child molestation, criminal battery, women who have detained boys or men in their basements as sexual slaves, women who have trafficked in boys and men for the purposes of sexual gratification, at the expense of the humanity of those so used and abused?

I see men treat one another like sh*t often, beating each other up outside of bars, shouting and threatening each other: white men threatening and discriminating against men of color; heterosexual men bullying and beating gay men. I'm curious why you don't see men as a significant population of man-haters.

I honestly (I'm being entirely serious here) know of not one single woman who hates men. Not one. I know women who fear men, based on past experiences; I know women who fight for justice for women, for women to be free from rapist culture, from pornographic culture, from a dominant culture in which Indigenous North American women can be raped by white men without any recourse. I can't "reverse" this phenomenon and match it to reality. Could you name the social experiences, on a large scale, that lead you to see the world this way?

Regarding your use of the term "feminazi": Given social-political reality, aren't white men "the Nazis," and women of all ethnicities more like "European Jews" than the other way around? In what sense do feminists in North America control the media, run state police forces, direct the military, and form an unfathomably inhumane dictatorship, as Hitler did? What sense does it make to call any feminists "Nazis"? Please explain this to me. (Thank you.)

How have you been harmed, personally, by women?

I look forward to your response. Thanks for engaging on this topic. I appreciate your willingness to keep the dialogue open.

Julian

July 24, 2008 11:13 AM

My comment,

@Julianreal

While I agree that this is probably pointless, I can't help but respond to some of your assertions, in particular the ones concerning pornography.

I'm always curious how the kind of sex being performed in pornography becomes oppression of women by men. The women choose to work in the sex industry. They choose to participate in the manner of sex being performed within the films.

Undergo the unsavory experience of visiting a few blogs by women who are into humiliation and degradation. You'll find that many rape fantasy stories and sites have a large female following.

All most of your allegations prove is that there is a darker side to human nature.

For every man who has committed acts of rape or violence, there is a woman who has committed an equally despicable act. All human beings have a capacity for evil. It is a feminist fallacy that men hold a monopoly on that evil.

Under the current clime of female empowerment without corresponding accountability, I would argue that women are more and more frequently guilty of immoral and dishonest behavior. I would say the most distinctive difference between the evil committed by men and women is that women are largely allowed to commit it with impunity. The bad behavior of men is advertised and denounced by every availiable medium while the bad behavior of women is ignored, minimized or justified.

You may not know any women who will state that they hate men, but we live in an environment that embraces and promotes hatred of men, evidenced quite clearly by your post.

It's a very small percentage of men who are rapists, murderers or pedophiles, yet you would have us believe that society is rife with them and women are living in a state of terror waiting to be victimized by them.

I don't once hear you allude to the type of men I know, the type of men that most men are. There's no reference to husbands and fathers who devote their lives to their families. No mention of soldiers or firefighters who sacrifice themselves for the lives and freedoms of others. No mention of the men who quietly go about their lives trying to leave the world a better place than how they found it.

THESE are the type of men I know. The type of men who you malign and villify by collectively lumping them with rapists,murderers and pedophiles. The type of men whose sacrifices and goodness you discount and brush off as you quickly jump back to trying to show how inherently evil men are simply by virtue of their gender.

More...

EXCELLENT post, Kim!

"""""Practically every woman I know has been seriously harmed physically, emotionally, and sexually by a man or by several men,""""""""""

this is a salient plank of feminitism ie the victim hood black armband line designed to elicit sympathy for the slack and idle feminits

You go girl! You show her/them the real facts and evidence of what we have come to understand. Even if she/they don't listen, it might strike some doubt in their minds. That's all it takes.

You got rep.

Thank you everyone, and thanks for the rep!

The self-flagellation by men such as Julianreal is a constant puzzlement. He decries and villifies men, lumping all in with/as rapists and prnographers, as Kim points out, but what sort of man does he see himself as?

Does he distinguish himself from the mass of evil men, who he sees as pretty well every man that walked? And in what way?

Perhaps he sees himself as a 'new man', somehow genetically different from his penis wielding fellows. Maybe he sees himself as having 'risen above' other men through his own appreciation of feminism. He doesn't mention himself or big-note his difference, so I don't see a narcissism. He curries favour with 'women', perhaps seeing all women as victims. It must come as a bit of a shock to such men finding a woman such as Kim who say's 'hold on a bit; I see very different men around me'.

He exhibits a cognitive strategy that seems common amongst feminists: Appear to be 'morally superior' by knocking everyone else down.

These sort of guys are the extreme version of the nice guy who hates the jerk/arsehole/jock etc for getting women when he, the nice guy, cannot. The hatred is just a form of bitter jealousy. These manginas you are referring to are an extension of the above sort of guys. As their failures with women and their jealousy accrues they begin to loathe the idea of being a man. They cannot understand why they have no success with women, despite doing everything the woman she wants done, whereas the man who doesn't listen to women want and doesn't treat them special simply because their last chromosome is an X, succeeds with women. These guys, being jealous and feeling emasculated hope to prove themselves by impressing women by taking up their cause and literally turning against their own manhood. They lack the masculinity to prove themselves as men so they go to the extreme to try and prove themselves the opposite. How many of these guys, who all pretend to be a woman's friend and act asexual, secretly want to be loved (or at least) have sex with the woman they hang around? To the woman though such a person is either a sexless child, some sort of oddity, or something akin to a pet. Unfair as this may be, life isn't inherently fair anyway.All the above (with the exception of the last line) is just my take on things.

Some of you here may not 'like' me anymore, for my comments within the following propaganda hit piece against White men, penned by a hateful jewish feminist, posing as an unbiased 'journalist', but these comments reflect a grim reality. Our nations have been taken over by an elite group of nation wreckers. I use this term, to avoid being slurred and labled.

Do yourselves a favor and research who the nation wreckers originally were and still are, behind feminism.
The cast list reads like a phone book from Tel Aviv...

As I said, the crybabies and lemmings here will probably decry me with all the usual jewish coined lables including, but not limited to; "racist", "hater", "bigot" and mysogynist, but you know what? I don't really care. The things I post are the truth, and nothing can change that. Our situation as Men, or more importantly as this "author" suggests, WHite Men, is precarious. Even desperate. Right now wymyn hold all the cards, because our grandfathers let "people' like bella abzug, and gloria stienem take them from them willingly. They willingly gave wymyn the same opportunities as Men,in good faith. In return, my generation and that of my sons and grandsons, must face a world where wymyn may do as they please, especially at the cost and destruction of men. It must end and that ending begins with the truth.

Good day.
**

I'll accept that Jews secretly run the world if you accept that Jews are smarter than everyone else

If by smarter, you mean: better able to worm their way into positions of power, money and influence, craftier when it comes to cheating, and more clever when garnering sympathy for themselves as perpetual victims of evil White racism, specifically evil White Nazi racism, which in turn makes them unaccountable for their many crimes against humanity, then I'll accept that.

One would think that with all those smarts that they're always bragging about, the jews would have made a better world for everyone else.

Alas, it seems they use their 'intellect' only for the ends I listed.

Is it good for jews? If so, it sucks for everybody else...
**