Fear of Strangers: The rise in random killings indicates a disturbing increase in violence

There has always been a peculiar sort of comfort in the knowledge that, in the context of a relatively low murder rate, we [in the UK] are all more likely to be killed by a lover or spouse than by a stranger. To die at the hands of a stranger seems, somehow, even more horrifying. So today’s discovery by The Times, that random killings have increased by a third in just eight years to the point where they now equal the number of murders carried out as crimes of passion, is alarming.

..

The figures must be kept in perspective. Stranger murders, which rose from 99 in 1997 to 130 last year, still account for less than 10 per cent of the annual total. But the increase certainly puts reassurances about crime levels in a different light.

The increases have been largest in London, and Devon & Cornwall. It is not clear what these two regions have in common, except large numbers of disafffected young men who seem to be the most common perpetrators and also the most frequent victims.

..

The similarities between the approach taken by Greater Manchester Police and those in New York City are striking. In both places, police have made enormous headway by taking a zero-tolerance approach to criminal gangs and petty crime, and by backing grassroots efforts to lure young men away from both.

Interesting that they actually deign to note that men are more likely to be the victims of this rise in seemingly random homicide. But also note that they point out that it is likely to be "disaffected young men" carrying out such crimes. Indeed, although women are quite capable - and, these days, more than willing - to be violent, it cannot be denied that men are more likely to be behind these random acts of melees, mayhem, murder and mischief. Women are certainly increasingly violent too, often hanging out in gangs and getting up to yobbishness. However, it seems a majority are men and boys, and more importantly "disaffected young men."

These men are disaffected how? And why?

I dare say being told from childhood onwards, by teachers, lecturers, the media and politicians that they're nothing but a bunch of violent potential rapists, nothing but scum, nothing but walking wallets and sperm donors, fit for **** all but being extorted for maintenance for ex-wives and common-law-wives and child-support, or - if you manage to avoid being embroiled legally with a woman - harvested for taxes for slag single mothers, and maybe being called up to serve as cannon-fodder in times of war, but otherwise nothing but a piece of shit male good for nothing compared to Almighty Females, is probably a fair reason why more and more young men of Britain are disaffected and pissed off, resorting to the nihilistic void of drink and random violence.

What the **** else is there to do for so many young men? Behave, get a job, marry and raise children? Hah! Yeah, maybe we had such ambitions when we lived in a Patriarchy, something our forefathers spent generations creating, but thanks to a couple of generations of feminists and their mother****ing mangina political lackeys, that's all kinda been flushed down the toilet here in the West. Along with our civilisation as well of course, because Patriarchy essentially is civilisation.

Without a Patriarchy, us humans are just reduced to a Matriarchy, a state of non-society whereby we're just shaved monkeys, an atavistic mob where the females line up to get impregnanted by whichever male can chase off the other males by hurling faecal matter, spears or bullets at them, whichever object happens to be nearby/invented. Don't believe me? Visit your local inner-city single-mother dominated ghetto whereby almost every household is a woman and her various bastards by different (absent) fathers. Keep your car doors locked though. And don't look anyone in the eye!

Then of course we have the feminized schooling system whereby girls are told how much better they are, encouraged to get careers, given women-only colleges/universities and scholarships, their own man-hating courses (Womyn's Studies) and then positive discrimination in the workplace. Is it any wonder more boys just think "**** it", drop out and do as they please? If they're treated as scum by teachers - who are overwhelmingly female and often hardcore feminists - then they'll end up acting like scum out of sheer spite. And why bother working hard and being a good law-abiding citizen anyway? You'll just get taxed to fund single mothers, obliged to work extra hard to cover lazy ****ing career gals on their long career break, or could end up in prison for ten-years because you foolishly had consensual sex with a woman who'd had a couple of drinks and decided to accuse you of rape.

Today, in the Matriarchal West, a man can:

Work hard = get taxed to pay for single mothers, to essentially pay for his own redundancy

Be a nice guy = get ignored until the local slags want a sucker to help raise some thug's bastard

Respect young women = never get laid, until she's old and has been thrown aside by thugs

Love your country = get taken advantage by your ****ry

Criticise feminism = labelled a misogynist and sent to prison for 'hate speech'

They also talk of weaning young men away from gangs. This is usually done by providing a strong male role-model where one was forever missing, namely replacing/substituting a dumb single mother slag with a stern yet understanding male authority figures. Rarely does anyone in the public eye dare point out that, before feminism gave the traditional family a well aimed kick to the gonads, virtually all families actually had a stern yet understanding male authority figure, namely a ****ing father! Feminism has created and encouraged an army of single-mothers, with an appropriate army of boys with no fathers, who do what all boys do and seek a male role-model and the best that's around is the local dealer or thief. And thanks to feminism ensuring that females are pampered should they get knocked up by a thug, there's nothing to stop - indeed, there's a lot of rewards, such as a free house - local girls from whoring around with the local thugs.

On a smaller scale there was a story on a BBC documentary a year or two ago about a teenaged boy raised by a single mum. He was always stealing cars, breaking into houses, drinking white cider and shit. A middle-aged man from a local youth club, an ex-policeman, volunteered to act as a mentor for the boy and just spent a few hours with him at weekends, taking him to do voluntary work like helping old folks or taking part in the clean-up of a local park. After a shaky start, the boy soon turned around and eventually ended up a charming model citizen, helping out at the old folk's home long after his mentor had departed. The BBC raved about how cool this turn-around was but did not dare point out that the kid would probably have not been a wild little feral ****er in the first place had he actually had a father to guide him through life in the first place, rather than just some ill-educated Trisha-watching pissed up dumb **** of a single mum.

These stranger-murders are, sadly, just the tip of the iceberg. No-one, least of all me, would be foolish enough to imply that life in a Patriarchy is a crime-free utopia, some sort of eternal Bedford Falls. But nonetheless, random violence, slackerhood, alienation and violent crime is clearly rising, and as is obvious to anyone with sensory organs it is in large part a result of "disaffected" young men, young men who have no purpose in life.

Feminism sought to remove us men's purpose in life, to take away our position as head of our families, and the incentive for us to Be Nice. It proves the stupidity of feminists and those dumb enough to follow them that they fail to correlate their success in this very mission with the current trend of an increasing number of nihilistic, "disaffected", binge-drinking, women-despising and violent young men who can't find any purpose in their lives except to cause trouble.

Ah well. Who gives a shit?

More...