Turkey Baster Creationist Courts & Ms.Andry

Ohso · #1 23rd-June-2008

Turkey Baster Creationist Courts:

The recent 'reporting' by the myopic seeing eye 'watchdogs' of our Old Media of New Laws and Important / Milestone Legal events in the Radical Gender Feminist / Homosex 'Cannibal Soup' Pander or Perish Pogrom (where one either joins voluntarily as a diner, or involuntarily as dinner), including the Attack on Marriage and Male Fathers, is interesting if only for the significance of what it fails to include or explain, and why.

Sitting like the veritable Elephant in the Middle of the Press Room are numerous sticky issues that our watchdogs of the fabled 'Fourth Estate' of government (Executive, Legislative, Judicial & Tabloid branches) have decided it is better to largely ignore, or spin only in small sound bites.

For Example; a new flood of Pro-Homosex Pander or Perish Laws, passed like sewer gas by the Democrap controlled Weimar Kalifornia Legislature, and signed by our RINO Hollyweird Child Pimp Uberkommandant - Der Arnold, are now ready for Ruthless (BAMN - BAMN: Bash Men, By Any Means Necessary!) Enforcement by the Thought Police.

When they actually do mention such Pander or Perish pogroms, the media euphemistically refers to them as anti-discrimination Laws - such as when Pro -Family / Religious / Childrens bookstores are required to hire and publicly promote homo-anal dirty diaper sado masochistic bondage flogging activists as normal and healthy & proper employee representatives.

However, the combination of Monumental Importance and Studied Media Ignorance / Biased Reporting found in the California Turkey Baster Trio of Cases, simultaneously published by the Misandrist (male hating) disgrace of a state supreme court on August 22, 2005 (K.M., v. E.G.: S125643 / Elisa B.v. Superior Court ; S125912 / Kristine H. v. Lisa R.: S126945) - highlights like no other story the same old story of Pro-Homosex propagandizing in service of Misandry (Hatred of Men) that is a media staple year in and male hating year out.

Built on a foundation created by decades of hyper zealous radical Mau Mauing by Dyke (Dyke = Hyper Militant Misandrist) Hatemongers and their allies, as well as ruthless censorship, silencing and punishment of opposition through use of Thought Policing tactics Stalin would admire, these cases represent nothing less than endorsement of Dyke Separatist / Neo-Exterminationist Misandry as State Policy by the California Supreme Court.

It seeks to enshrine in the law a Double Standard Against MEN So Bizarre that it is destroyed by the very contradictions in internal logic of the argument presented; not that this hinders or even mildly embarrasses the Court in its rush to Pander.

Stepping through the warped looking glass sold the Court by the twisted systerhood of Separatist / Neo-Exterminationist Dyke Hatemongers, it is easy to see the results of decades of Radical Homosex Indoctrination in the Legal profession, particularly the pathetic farce of rank Misandry that characterizes the Gender field of Legal Education.

But for the student of both science and the law, it is the Courts rending of both in to tattered shreds to shroud its disgrace, that so astounds and bemuses. Long story short - The California Supreme Court has Defined Fatherhood for All Time and it has Nothing to Do with being MALE!

In Fact, in the opinion of Californias Supreme Judges - to be Fatherless is to lack a proper source of Financial Support, and Not a Man who is your Daddy. They have therefore logically deduced that while children may Not Have Three Parents (why, they dont really say), the same children May Have Two Dykes and No Daddy, even if (as in one case) they are Siblings who were intended at conception to be biologically related to each other through the Non-Father/ donor:

"We rejected the suggestion of amicus curiae that both the wife and the surrogate could be the childs mother, stating that a child can have only one mother, but what we considered and rejected in Johnson was the argument that a child could have three parents: a father and two mothers. We did not address the question presented in this case of whether a child could have two parents, both of whom are women." Elisa B. case.

Mind you now - this is Not about Adoption, but rather courts redefining ˜Natural" Parenting (we recognized in In re Nicholas H., supra, 28 Cal.4th 56, that natural as used in the UPA does not always mean biological).

Future posts will discuss in greater detail the language of the decision, and the blatant Rejection of Definitive DNA Science (a legacy of case of the Adoption of Michael H. (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1043 case) in favor of validating the desire of Dykes to Legally Exterminate Men as Fathers - relegating them to the role of un-gendered insemination sources without any parental rights to their children.

In essence The Sperm Donor is Not a Father (and has No Legal Liability) if he does not touch the woman with his penis, and instead uses a Deadbeat Dad Factory / Sperm Bank as intermediary in his desire to produce as many children as possible without any responsibility for them: As the supreme court said:

"the California Legislature has afforded unmarried as well as married women a statutory vehicle for obtaining semen for artificial insemination without fear that the donor may claim paternity, and has likewise provided men with a statutory vehicle for donating semen to married and unmarried women alike without fear of liability for child support." (Jhordan C. v. Mary K. (1986)

BUT - and as they say in fashion circles, this is a big but, if the Man Engages in Normal Heterosexual Relations (what they call in Law School Rape because they teach that women are mentally incapable of consenting to Heterosex), even if he Did Not Want Children and was deliberately Lied to by the mother - Well, Use a Penis, Go to Jail is just the new truth de jour in Dyke-topia. Or as the state supreme court said:

"Usually, whether there is evidence of a parent and child relationship under the UPA does not depend upon the intent of the parent. For example, a man who engages in sexual intercourse with a woman who assures him, falsely, that she is incapable of conceiving children is the father of a resulting child, despite his lack of intent to become a father."K.M. v. E. G. 2005.

There you have it in a nutshell INTENT Doesnt Matter - For a Man. Donate as many children as you Want to create, just so long as you dont actually touch the womyn.

Touch her, and it doesnt matter what you intended or what she told you was true - liability is unlimited, and the choice whether to make a Man a Father of a Child, or abort a fetus, is hers alone.

By contrast to the treatment of Intentional Deadbeat Donors, consider how the supreme court treats womyn in analogous situation:

"A woman who supplies ova to be used to impregnate her lesbian partner, with the understanding that the resulting child will be raised in their joint home, cannot waive her responsibility to support that child. Nor can such a purported waiver effectively cause that woman to relinquish her parental rights." K.M. V. E. G. 2005.

The majoritys rule validates such agreements when its conditions are satisfied -conditions that include the fact the parties to the agreement Must Be Dykes.

Or, as a dissent by one justice read:
"Although the majority denies that its rule depends on sexual orientation the opinion speaks for itself; The majority has chosen to use the term lesbian no less than six times in articulating its holding. Moreover, the majority prevents future courts from applying its holding automatically to persons other than lesbians.
I see no rational basis, and the majority articulates none for permitting the enforceability of an ovum donation agreement to depend on the sexual orientation of the parties. Indeed, lacking a rational basis, the rule may well violate equal protection."

Violate Equal Protection! Gosh, how did they ever come up with that one?

After all, California would have to change its Official State Policy of Punishing and Censoring discussion of the topic of Discrimination against the Despised and Disposable Male Minority, just for the rest of us (Males) to be allowed to talk about equal protection...

And I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for such a sea change either.

Best keep quiet about it though wouldnt want to spread any "Ism- Obia"now would we? What with everything else going around and all...

Ohso.
"Not merely the validity of experience but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied by their philosophy the heresy of heresies was common sense." George Orwell 1984 On the Thought Police

Ohso · #2 23rd-June-2008

Turkey Baster Creationists

Perhaps the greatest source of chagrin, for those discussing the intrinsically aberrant, degrading and objectively disordered nature of the sick hatreds and vile perversions that inform and motivate the mainstream of the Radical Homosex Agenda, is the bizarre fact that no matter how outrageous the portrayal of said Behaviors may seem – the reality of how such sickness is acted out makes true attempts at comparisons absurd.

So it is with no small amount of comparative dread that I approach the latest example of the type of Neo-Exterminationist Hatemongering that is the steady diet of hate propaganda fed to the population from the Frisco ‘Crock a Bull’ (S. F. Chronicle 9/6/04) via one of their full time dyke cheerleaders on staff – ‘reporter’ Rona Marech.

In an article entitled (Link = Gays forging creative paths to parenthood - Couples turn to co-parenting to build and raise families 09/06/2004 - San Francisco Chronicle ) Marech provides a classic textbook example of the ‘Politics of Adversarial Terminology’ via employment of the “Newspeak” of the Radical Homosex movement, and their insistence on the usage of tenderly crafted euphemisms to conceal the dagger of hatred under the cloak of ‘tolerance’.
For example, try the following quote on for size and guess what is really being sold:
“Co-Parents can conceive at home at no cost – with technology no more sophisticated than a syringe or a large eyedropper – which opens the door to people who can’t afford high-tech fertility options…”

Yes Indeed Campers – TURKEY BASTER BABIES – Brought to you courtesy of an agenda of Dyke Hatemongering that promotes what is clearly Heterosexual Reproduction – Just so long as the Penis is Excluded from contact with the Vagina.

For those not familiar with the concept, here is some background: The Turkey Baster idea goes back to an enterprising gender feminist of some time ago, who reportedly mixed the sperm of different men in one and then inseminated hyrself. Shye then claimed benefits for hyrself and the child without being required to name a ‘father’ – who the state could go after for reimbursement. Her position was essentially that shye had a ‘right’ to penis free procreation and the patriarchy owed hyr a living as reparations.

This idea was later crystallized in to the concept of “Government as Surrogate Husband” by in the book the Myth of Male Power, by Warren Farrell. It is espoused under different names by a number of gender feminist Misandrist, including former Cornell Professor of “Feminist Jurisprudence” Martha Feinman.

Essentially, the modern gender feminist utopia (gyno-topia) will be a place where womyn not only control all reproduction, but where the penis is superfluous and simply a conduit for the only useful thing about a man – the “Spitwad” of sperm.. Some academic ‘dreamers’ have actually postulated a future where men are reduced to a manageable 10% of the population, and managed sort of like a free range sperm bank, only different.

We get some small hint of this from Marech’s story when she quotes a wanna-be homosex male “Co-Parent” as unable to find appropriate dyke “Co-Parent” partners because: “Many women are fixed on having the lion’s share of responsibility.”

What it really comes down to (despite the phalocentric references to lions) is Hatred and Debasement of Men – and the simple fact that most Dyke Hatemongers will not associate with men who do not debase themselves in some way, particularly in their submission to the Dyke Agenda. Or – As Dyke Icon Valerie Solanas (author of the SCUM – Society for Cutting Up Men – Manifesto) spoke of their Male counterparts:

“SCUM (Society for Cutting Up Men) will kill all men who are not in the men’s auxiliary of SCUM. Men in the men’s auxiliary are those who are working diligently to eliminate themselves.. A few examples of men in the men’s auxiliary are: Men who kill men… Journalists, writers, editors, publishers, producers who disseminate and promote ideas that will lead to the achievement of SCUM’s goals;(homo-anal males) who, by their shimmering, flaming example, encourage others to de-man themselves and thereby make themselves relatively inoffensive."

Some want to claim that Solanas is old news, despite hyr continuing cult hyro status from the movie about hyr shooting 70’s pop icon Andy Warhol (emptied hyr gun in to him, and he still lived – typical of feminazi incompetence). To them I would point out that hyr “works” are still being performed by admirers well in to the 21st Century, at least in my ever ‘tolerant’ home town of Sodom by the Sea.

All fun and games aside, there is actually a ‘serious’ point to what at first seems like completely inane genocidal gibberish from what is most assuredly a “Feminazi Psychodyke Hatemonger.” Now admittedly, Solanas was leaking from a bunch of gaskets by the time she blew up Warhol, but hyr vision lives on with others more recently pumped up with such vengeful hatreds, and perhaps of steadier aim.

More clearly than any other of its kind, the “SCUM Manifesto” highlights the sick nature of the various types of ‘alliances’ that have taken place in the Homosex world, in order to coordinate the attack on society.

However – to use men for a bridge to the future is not to embrace them for more than the work beasts for the purpose of bringing about the new world order of “gynotopia,” or as some would style it “dyketopia” – sans penis monsters of course.

Many Dyke Hatemongers have chosen the “Dead Beat Dad Factory” (Sperm Bank) approach, and are pursuing lawsuits to eliminate mention of males as parents on birth certificates and substitution of other Dykes with only political relation to the child.
However, as Marech shows us, some dykes actually seem to enjoy keeping men in a subordinate role, so long as it feeds their ‘Penis Hate’ program in the process.

Some would say that it is indeed a sign of tolerance in the homosex “Rainbow” alliance (which keeps its Purple Dyke Stripe distinct and separate from all others) that some are actually flirting with the notion of permitting children to have “Fathers”…

Just as long as those politically enlightened Fathers agree with gyno-warrior Katherine MacKinnon and hyr cohorts (Favorites of Law School Gender Activists) who have shown that the Penis is the Real Problem in Heterosexual Reproduction- by ‘proving’ that all Heterosexual Intercourse is Rape (see attached quotes), and the only good penis is one that has nothing to do with vaginas, which are reserved for parents.

For example - Just one of a veritable plethora of truly twisted ironies, surrounding the Melissa Etheridge / Julie Cypher / David Crosby – marriage / love child triangle etc… - was the choice of Etheridge to mention the subject of Turkey Basters on national television, during their interview on the Larry King show. For the record, she claimed that none were used in creating the child, although all other details were omitted.

Still - Ya Gotta Love the Etheridge / Cypher / Crosby love child triangle regardless. It seems like even at the very outset as if they were thinking of the ‘eventual’ split up, and seeing as Cypher announced she was not actually a homosexual anyway, she may have seen it coming. Still, they looked smug on the cover of Rolling Stone.

But the choice of David Crosby (if he really is) as the deadbeat dad – how perfect! Think about it, if you really wanted to pick a guaranteed loser in a child custody fight, and John Hinkley were to remain in jail, then who better than Crosby to take the fall?

What a role model he is for the kid (boy wasn’t it?) and what an example for us all. Example of what? Well, maybe the media will tell us more later, and maybe not.

Best keep quiet about it though, wouldn’t want to spread any “Ism-Obia”
What with everything else going around and all.

Ohso
Not merely the validity of experience but the very existence of external reality were tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. George Orwell – 1984 On the Thought Police
…………………………………………………………………………………………

In dealing with the Dyke Hatemongers of the Radical Homosex Lobby, it is always important to understand some of the terms used. For example, the terms “Womyn” and “Wimmin” are often both employed, and there is a reason (although warped by hate like the rest of dyke ideology) for this spelling method...

Terms like “womyn / wimmin / hyr / shye…” are employed by the Dyke element of the Radical Homosex lobby as a means of promoting their hatred and denigration of men throughout society. By butchering the language this way, dykes also symbolically butcher the male penis / genitals in a way that helps fuel their rage.

Consider - Women v. Womyn. The word ‘Women’ contains the hated term of rape and oppression = “men” / whereas womyn is free of the taint of the brutish raping testosterone poisoned patriarchal pig penis oppressor. Likewise with the term – Her v. Hyr, which removes the evil sign of “He” from the proper femyle terminology.

Think this is silly? Then you are either a pig yourself, or a hopeless femyle dupe of the patriarchy who needs to be enlightened or put down before submitting to Rape (defined as normal heterosexual intercourse) again.

I know what some of you are thinking – who in the world would say such things? Well, I figured that a little list of some notable quotes (not all quoted are Dykes, but all are hyros to them) might help fill out the picture, before delving even deeper in to the nature of the evil being pushed on us

Remember – these are not obscure hatemongers – these are Mainstream (right in old senator “Bag It Babs” Boxer’s camp) and are regularly taught and held up as feminist role models in the pathetic farce that passes for the social engineering field of academia.

ENJOY…
Ohso
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
"All men are rapists and that's all they are." Marilyn French, Author; (later, advisor to Al Gore's Presidential Campaign.)

"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman." Catherine MacKinnon

"I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it." Former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan.

"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies." Andrea Dworkin

'To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo." rom the ’Scum (society for cutting up men) Manifesto’. (Valerie Solanas)

"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them."
Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig." Andrea Dworkin; Ice And Fire

"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience." Catherine Comin, Vassar College. Assistant Dean of Students.

"In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent." Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies.

"And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual (male), it may be mainly a quantitative difference."
Susan Griffin, Rape: The All-American Crime.

"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist". Ti-Grace Atkinson, Amazon Odyssey (p. 86).

"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression..." Sheila Jeffrys.

"Men renounce whatever they have in common with women so as to experience no commonality with women; and what is left...is one piece of flesh a few inches long, the penis. The penis is the man; the man is human; the penis signifies humanity. Andrea Dworkin

Ohso · #3 24th-June-2008

Cypher Dykes & Ms.Andry

Just one of a veritable plethora of truly twisted ironies, surrounding the Melissa Etheridge / Julie Cypher / David Crosby – marriage / love child triangle etc… - was the choice of Etheridge to mention the subject of Turkey Basters on national television, during their interview on the Larry King show. For the record, she claimed that none were used in creating the child, although all other details were omitted.

The Turkey Baster idea goes back to an enterprising gender feminist of some time ago, who reportedly mixed the sperm of different men in one and then inseminated hyrself. Shye then claimed benefits for hyrself and the child without being required to name a ‘father’ – who the state could go after for reimbursement. Her position was essentially that shye had a ‘right’ to penis free procreation and the patriarchy owed hyr.

This idea was later crystallized in to the concept of “Government as Surrogate Husband” by in the book the Myth of Male Power, by Warren Farrell. It is espoused under different names by a number of gender feminist Misandrist, including Cornell Professor of Feminist Jurisprudence, Martha Feinman.

Essentially, the modern gender feminist utopia (gyno-topia) will be a place where womyn not only control all reproduction, but where the penis is superfluous. Some academic ‘dreamers’ have actually postulated a future where men are reduced to a manageable 10% of the population, and managed sort of like a free range sperm bank, only different.

While the roots of such pogroms stretch quite a ways back, their modern base can be easily seen in the gender feminist regime of the Female Fuhrer of Germany – Gertrude Scholtz Klink. In her fascinating book Mothers in the Fatherland, Author Claudia Koontz details these early gender feminist fanatics of separatist supremacy, and how their powerful legacy developed while the male population was being sacrificed by lunatics.

Of course, Very Few academic institutions and even fewer gender programs ever pay much attention to these individuals and movements, far too politically incorrect. However, there is important information here, which is why this post has to be written around the censors of the Thought Police.

Sooooooooooo… The Point.

In the context of “same sex marriage between womyn” we are told that we must now pretend that procreative acts - which although Heterosexual in their very essence, are in fact homosexual parenting and we should not ask questions about creatures such as fathers. In some cases, the law is changing to exclude the mention of a father from the birth certificate and substitution of a ‘partner’, and in other places, it is left blank because it just doesn’t matter.

Shopping on line from the catalogs of “Dead Beat Dad Factories”, also known as sperm banks, is a major method for “same sex parents” to find a father who can be disposed of after harvested for the “spitwad” of genetic material that they still need to conceive. At least until science offers single sex reproduction, after which all bets are off on how long males are allowed to roam the earth at all.

In its essence, this is simply exterminationist. Not to the level of building ovens like certain prior national socialists, mind - but a kinder and gentler sort of extermination. Kind of like phasing out the penis monster gradually, only different.

All of which begs the question – why should men pay to support those who use us to become parents, and then want to claim we don’t exist, save to pay taxes to which they are now entitled – as parents????

Still - Ya Gotta Love the Etheridge / Cypher / Crosby love child triangle regardless.

It seems like even at the very outset as if they were thinking of the ‘eventual’ split up, and seeing as Cypher announced she was not actually a homosexual anyway, she may have seen it coming first. But then they looked so comfy on the cover of Rolling Stone.

But the choice of David Crosby (if he really is) as the deadbeat dad – how perfect. If you wanted to pick a guaranteed loser in a custody fight, and John Hinkley were to remain in custody, then who better than Crosby to take the fall?

What a role model for the kid (boy wasn’t it?) and what an example for us all.

Example of what – well maybe the Thought Police will let me post more on that one. Later.

Ohso
"Not merely the validity of experience but the very existence of external reality were tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense." George Orwell – 1984 On the Thought Police

Ohso · #4 26th-June-2008

Go ahead: Arrest me -

Censorship. Book burning. The Criminalization of Christianity. It's here and it's now the law in the state of Colorado.

worldnetdaily.com 24 June 2008. The Ku Klux Klan can march. The Nazis can hand out brochures. Skinheads can do whatever it is that Skinheads do. But in the state of Colorado, the only group who is NOT allowed to be heard is ... the
Christians. They're the ones who disagree with same-sex marriage,
cohabitation, and believe the biblical view that homosexuality is a
sin.
But if they voice that objection from now on, it had better be
inside the four walls of a church. If not, they'll be staring at the
four walls of a prison cell ... for up to a year. No kidding.

Tobin Kerns was planning his own Columbine-like mass murder. But they
caught him and convicted him of conspiracy to commit murder and
threatening to use deadly weapons in 2006, sentencing him to a
whopping ... 10 months. Plan a Columbine-like mass murder and you'll do 10 months in jail.

Say homosexual "marriage" is a sin (in a state where same-sex marriage is illegal), and you'll be doing a year behind bars.

You see, Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter signed into law SB 200 and turned
public restrooms and locker rooms into a predator paradise where men
can enter (and shower in) any female public facility in the state.
You'd think that would be as bad as it gets – but wait: Section 8 of
that same bill claims to trump the First Amendment:

Section 8. 24-34-701. Publishing of discriminative matter forbidden.
No person, being the owner, lessee, proprietor, manager,
superintendent, agent, or employee of any place of public
accommodation ... shall publish, issue, circulate, send, distribute,
give away, or display in any way, manner, or shape or by any means or
method, except as provided in this section, any communication, paper,
poster, folder, manuscript, book, pamphlet, writing, print, letter,
notice, or advertisement of any kind, nature, or description that is
intended or calculated to discriminate or actually discriminates
against ... SEXUAL ORIENTATION, marital status ... in the matter of
furnishing or neglecting or refusing to furnish to them or any one of
them any lodging, housing, schooling, or tuition or any
accommodation, right [marriage], privilege [adoption], advantage, or
convenience ... on account of ... SEXUAL ORIENTATION, marital
status ... [which] is unwelcome or objectionable or not acceptable,
desired, or solicited.

Forget the public library display of "banned books week" –
its "banned books week" all year round in the entire state of
Colorado – if those books, paper, posters, folders, manuscripts,
pamphlet, writing, print, letter, notice, advertisement, or crayon
drawing is said to be calculated, intended, or thought to
discriminate against homosexual behavior, or the agenda to rewrite
marriage and adoption laws.

I predicted it three years ago. And a lot of people said I was crazy.
But my book, "The Criminalization of Christianity," subtitle: "Read
this Before it Becomes Illegal" just became … illegal. And it's no
longer just in Sweden, Europe, and Canada; it's right here in what
used to be known as the "land of the free."

A week from today I'm flying to Denver and attending a press
conference with Colorado pastors and state leaders to … break the
law. We are handing out my book, "The Criminalization of
Christianity," and waiting for arrest. It may be that next week's
column will be written from a jail cell. I tend to think that would
be a stupid move on the government's part. I predict they will lay
low and peg off the less vocal types first. Wait for the cement in
the law to become solid before chaining it to the feet of Christians
who dare speak out.

Forget my book. Another far more important book just got banned in
Colorado: the Bible. Don't believe me? Take a look at Leviticus 18,
Romans 1, 1 Corinthians 6 and 1 Timothy 1. There's a bunch more
verses, and they all just became illegal.

Thankfully, our rights don't come from the elected officials in
Colorado. They don't even come from the U.S. Supreme Court. We
are "endowed with" our rights from "our Creator." And the good news
is, our Founding Fathers were smart enough to write them down in a
document known as the U.S. Constitution.
And if we read that document, we find something called the First Amendment. And you know what? It trumps Colorado SB 200, Gov. Bill Ritter and the homosexual
agenda.

Ohso · #5 26th-June-2008

No skipping gay-friendly classes, schools tell parents - Catholic group says parents must have the right to pull kids out of classes

By Allison Cross, Vancouver Sun

The Vancouver board of education says it plans to enforce a ministry policy that prevents parents from pulling students out of classes that deal with alternative sexuality.

A recent staff recommendation from the Vancouver board of education says parents can pull their children out of sensitive lessons in health classes because of religious or family beliefs, but can't opt their children out of gay-friendly lessons in any other classes....

They aren't exempt from the lessons completely and must learn the
material outside the classroom setting, by home instruction or self-
directed studies. They also have to prove they've learned the material.

Edward Da Vita, a spokesman for the Catholic Civil Rights League,
said he would prefer parents be able to pull their children out of
any class containing controversial material. "The problem now is that
controversial subject matter can be brought up any time, anywhere,
and there is no reasonable alternative delivery available for that,"
he said...

The ministry guidelines stem from a contract the government signed
with gay activists Murray and Peter Corren.
The couple launched a
human-rights case against the government, which ended the lawsuit by
signing an agreement to add teachings about gay, lesbian, bisexual
and transgendered issues to the provincial curriculum.

Ohso · #6 26th-June-2008

Alberta Tribunal Leaves Canada Speechless

David Ben Gurion, the first Israeli Prime Minister, once said, "The test of democracy is freedom of criticism." Nowhere have politicians more miserably failed that test than in Alberta, Canada, where the gatekeepers of political correctness--the Human Rights Commission (HRC)--have sentenced a pastor to a lifetime of silence.

The case was initiated in 2002, when Rev. Stephen Boissoin published letters to the editor opposing same-sex "marriage" in the Red Deer Advocate. At the time, Canada was embroiled in a debate over whether to legalize counterfeit marriage across the country.

When Professor Darren Lund of Calgary read Boissoin's editorials, he filed a complaint with the Alberta HRC, alleging that the content of the articles was "hateful."

The Commission appointed a tribunal to investigate Boissoin, led by an unelected bureaucrat Lori Andreachuk. Last November, Andreachuk found Boissoin guilty of discrimination and, without the benefit of his testimony, forbade him from uttering "anything disparaging about homosexuals."

Notice that Andreachuk does not ban him from speaking about anything "illegal" but bars him from any negativity toward gays and lesbians.
The official punishment, issued without so much as a public hearing, includes everything from personal emails to congregational sermons.

As if the lifetime speech ban were not tyrannical enough, Andreachuk also ordered Boissoin to compensate Professor Lund, who was not a victim of the so-called "hate crime," $5,000.

Under the terms of his sentencing, the Reverend must "cease publishing...remarks about homosexuals" and submit a written apology to Lund for publication in the Red Deer Advocate.

Ezra Levant, who is under similar scrutiny for printing cartoons about Mohammed, notes in a new column, "[Boissoin] has to publicly humiliate himself, by publicly declaring his contrition--a contrition he does not feel--and his abandonment of his deeply-held religious beliefs... Does that happen anywhere outside of Communist China?"

Conservatives across Canada are in an uproar over the ruling and many are demanding that Premier Ed Stelmach follow through with his promise to review the unbridled "censorship powers" of the HRC.

If he refuses, Alberta's thought police can indict any pastor or average citizen who holds political or moral views contrary to the powers-that-be.

Additional Resources
Ezra Levant: What could Mark Steyn's punishment look like? Look at Alberta