'Slut' exposure - Not.

**Percy** · #1 13th-November-2008

A loose woman on the loose. So name the man with her.

Quote:

Glenn Sacks

An Example of ‘Slut Shaming’?
2008-11-12 at 4:20 pm · Filed under blog
From Couple arrested for 'having sex' on crowded train (Daily Mail, 11/11/08):

A couple have been arrested for allegedly having sex in a crowded train carriage.

Other passengers en route from Liverpool to London appear to have sat in embarrassed silence as the 41-year-old woman allegedly committed a sex act on her male partner.

The pair were arrested by police on arrival at Euston station. Officers are believed to have been called after a guard on the Virgin intercity train spotted the couple on CCTV.

A man has been charged and a woman bailed for allegedly having sex on a crowded Virgin train, like this one

Businessman Gregory Sim, 49, has been charged with unacceptable behaviour while the unnamed woman, from Essex, has been bailed while inquiries continue.

A spokesman for British Transport Police said the session took place on Wednesday, October 22, at 2.45pm.

'The man, Gregory Sim, from Richmond, Surrey, has been charged with unacceptable behaviour on a train and is due to appear at City of Westminster magistrates on November 16,' he added.

Quizzed by reporters last night, Mr Sim confirmed his arrest but refused to give any more details.

If only the woman was named in the story, feminsts would--with some justification--say this is an exmaple of "slut shaming." But how many times would you see a story like this where they name only the woman and not the man? Rarely, I would guess.

Thanks to Chad, a reader, for sending it.

She was 'bailed while inquiries continue'. ? Is there a doubt that she was involved?

Lay your bets:

10:1 she was forced.
14:12 she was abused as a child
3:1 she didn't know what came over her (no laughing)
50:1 she was giving him a new form of resucitation.
20:3 she thought she was blowing up a balloon.

christianj · #2 13th-November-2008

She may even be compensated under the "victim of crime" act..

MadShangi · #3 13th-November-2008

I'm getting sick of women and children criminals not being named in the papers, while a man's is published. I'm pretty sure the "Young Offender's" bullshit act was a feminist idea.

**haahoo** · #4 13th-November-2008

I was once "named and shamed" in the newspapers for prowling the streets and picking up a honest woman..

Oddly, she was not named! Just me!!

Practically everyone read the local paper too, and it was on the frontpage..

Some folk I knew did not see the article, so I had to show them, just to complete my shame experience!!

Apparently, it was not ground for divorce though, I was told, I could not divorce my wife for adultery it was me that had done the adultery..

Yudonia · #5 13th-November-2008

Percy I'm gonna have to go with "3:1 she didn't know what came over her"

lolintertubes · #6 16th-November-2008

£10 on 20:3. I feel lucky.

I'd love to hear the reason for her not being named. Surely she is just as responsible as him? In fact there was a story recently about a couple being caught having sex in a park I think (the woman comes from the same place as me!) and they were both named so I don't see why not in this case.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
If you're not a slut ? Who is...	christianj	Australian Men's News	11	11th-November-2008 12:13 AM
Judge Says Indecent Exposure Law Applies to Men Only;	Rebadow	Raw deals: A men only club	21	3rd-November-2006 08:06 PM

'Slut' exposure - Not.

'Slut' exposure - Not.

Similar Threads