antimisandry.com


MaleStudies.org


  • Home
  • Library
  • General
  • Activism
  • Advice
  • Talk Points
  • Other Languages
  • Blogs
  • Groups
  • 'Slut' exposure - Not.

    This is a discussion on 'Slut' exposure - Not. within the Discrimination & Sexist Double Standards forums, part of the General category; A loose woman on the loose. So name the man with her. Glenn Sacks An Example of ‘Slut Shaming’? 2008-11-12 ...


    Go Back   antimisandry.com > General > Discrimination & Sexist Double Standards
    Connect with Facebook

    Register Support NetworkBlogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

    Notices

    Reply

     

    LinkBack Thread Tools
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
      #1  
    Old 13th-November-2008
    Percy's Avatar
    Australia
    A Knackered Old Knight.
     
    Rep Power: 274526
    Percy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant futurePercy has a brilliant future
    'Slut' exposure - Not.

    A loose woman on the loose. So name the man with her.

    Quote:
    Glenn Sacks

    An Example of ‘Slut Shaming’?
    2008-11-12 at 4:20 pm · Filed under blog
    From Couple arrested for 'having sex' on crowded train (Daily Mail, 11/11/08):

    A couple have been arrested for allegedly having sex in a crowded train carriage.

    Other passengers en route from Liverpool to London appear to have sat in embarrassed silence as the 41-year-old woman allegedly committed a sex act on her male partner.

    The pair were arrested by police on arrival at Euston station. Officers are believed to have been called after a guard on the Virgin intercity train spotted the couple on CCTV.

    A man has been charged and a woman bailed for allegedly having sex on a crowded Virgin train, like this one

    Businessman Gregory Sim, 49, has been charged with unacceptable behaviour while the unnamed woman, from Essex, has been bailed while inquiries continue.

    A spokesman for British Transport Police said the session took place on Wednesday, October 22, at 2.45pm.

    'The man, Gregory Sim, from Richmond, Surrey, has been charged with unacceptable behaviour on a train and is due to appear at City of Westminster magistrates on November 16,' he added.

    Quizzed by reporters last night, Mr Sim confirmed his arrest but refused to give any more details.

    If only the woman was named in the story, feminsts would--with some justification--say this is an exmaple of "slut shaming." But how many times would you see a story like this where they name only the woman and not the man? Rarely, I would guess.

    Thanks to Chad, a reader, for sending it.
    She was 'bailed while inquiries continue'. ? Is there a doubt that she was involved?

    Lay your bets:

    10:1 she was forced.
    14:12 she was abused as a child
    3:1 she didn't know what came over her (no laughing)
    50:1 she was giving him a new form of resucitation.
    20:3 she thought she was blowing up a balloon.




    I have tried all my life to leave the place better than I found it.
    But there are 6 billion other buggers out there messing it up.
    I am outnumbered.
    But...
    YOU don't just make a difference,
    you make THE difference.

     
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
      #2  
    Old 13th-November-2008
    Supporter
     
    Rep Power: 213895
    christianj has a brilliant futurechristianj has a brilliant futurechristianj has a brilliant futurechristianj has a brilliant futurechristianj has a brilliant futurechristianj has a brilliant futurechristianj has a brilliant futurechristianj has a brilliant futurechristianj has a brilliant futurechristianj has a brilliant futurechristianj has a brilliant future
    Re: 'Slut' exposure - Not.

    She may even be compensated under the "victim of crime" act..


     
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
      #3  
    Old 13th-November-2008
    MadShangi's Avatar
    Canada
    Established Member
     
    Rep Power: 14656
    MadShangi has a brilliant futureMadShangi has a brilliant futureMadShangi has a brilliant futureMadShangi has a brilliant futureMadShangi has a brilliant futureMadShangi has a brilliant futureMadShangi has a brilliant futureMadShangi has a brilliant futureMadShangi has a brilliant futureMadShangi has a brilliant futureMadShangi has a brilliant future
    Send a message via MSN to MadShangi Send a message via Yahoo to MadShangi
    Re: 'Slut' exposure - Not.

    I'm getting sick of women and children criminals not being named in the papers, while a man's is published. I'm pretty sure the "Young Offender's" bullshit act was a feminist idea.


     
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
      #4  
    Old 13th-November-2008
    haahoo's Avatar
    United Kingdom
    Established Member
     
    Rep Power: 87207
    haahoo has a brilliant futurehaahoo has a brilliant futurehaahoo has a brilliant futurehaahoo has a brilliant futurehaahoo has a brilliant futurehaahoo has a brilliant futurehaahoo has a brilliant futurehaahoo has a brilliant futurehaahoo has a brilliant futurehaahoo has a brilliant futurehaahoo has a brilliant future
    Send a message via Yahoo to haahoo
    Re: 'Slut' exposure - Not.

    I was once "named and shamed" in the newspapers for prowling the streets and picking up a honest woman..

    Oddly, she was not named! Just me!!

    Practically everyone read the local paper too, and it was on the frontpage..

    Some folk I knew did not see the article, so I had to show them, just to complete my shame experience!!

    Apparently, it was not ground for divorce though, I was told, I could not divorce my wife for adultery it was me that had done the adultery..


     
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
      #5  
    Old 13th-November-2008
    America
    Established Member
     
    Rep Power: 0
    Yudonia is an unknown quantity at this point
    Re: 'Slut' exposure - Not.

    Percy I'm gonna have to go with "3:1 she didn't know what came over her"


     
    Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
      #6  
    Old 16th-November-2008
    lolintertubes's Avatar
    United Kingdom Scotland
    Links Moderation Team
     
    Rep Power: 20307
    lolintertubes has a brilliant futurelolintertubes has a brilliant futurelolintertubes has a brilliant futurelolintertubes has a brilliant futurelolintertubes has a brilliant futurelolintertubes has a brilliant futurelolintertubes has a brilliant futurelolintertubes has a brilliant futurelolintertubes has a brilliant futurelolintertubes has a brilliant futurelolintertubes has a brilliant future
    Re: 'Slut' exposure - Not.

    £10 on 20:3. I feel lucky.

    I'd love to hear the reason for her not being named. Surely she is just as responsible as him? In fact there was a story recently about a couple being caught having sex in a park I think (the woman comes from the same place as me!) and they were both named so I don't see why not in this case.





     
    Reply

    Tags
    abused, article, behaviour, blog, british, dailymail, essex, exposure, feminist, forced, glenn sacks, london, lut, male, mensnewsdaily, police, sacks, sex, slut, sport, uk, united kingdom, woman, www

    Thread Tools

    Stuff up for grabs!

    See more products, here

     

     


    Similar Threads

    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    If you're not a slut ? Who is... christianj Australian Men's News 7 11th-November-2008 12:13 AM
    Judge Says Indecent Exposure Law Applies to Men Only; Rebadow Discrimination & Sexist Double Standards 21 3rd-November-2006 08:06 PM


    All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:59 PM.


    All content is copyright antimisandry.com 2005 - 2010

    LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO