Gee whiz...I wonder why so many are not interested in marriage or trying hard in a relationship. It's so one sided these days.

This case should continue in court under appeal.

The twisting of logic and the swamping of truth and reason and freedom with a cobbled-together blanket of mendacity, excuse, fatuousness and blindness, by honeyed words and misplaced emotionalism, by people who are paid hundreds of thousands each year to Guard the Constitution, is of such proportion as to constitute a pathology.

It is neurotic and the least and occasionally full-blown psychotic.

One could take half a dozen of the quotes in the article and show the mendacities. I take just one:

Ahhhh. Isn't that kind of them. How considerate and compassionate. Mother's well-being. Vulnerable children. Aahhh.

What the status-quo, anti-father mob defend is the well-being of LIARS and DECEIVERS and the UNFAITHFUL, VOW-BREAKERS. These people should be Punished, not coo'ed over. The children are not just vulnerable ( a word indicating future possible dangers) they are already damaged by the past lies and deceptions of their immoral mothers these scum are defending with honeyed, emotive words. And these family destroyers want the children to continue living with the scum mother rather than the honest man.

A German perspective:
- If you accept fatherhood you have 2 years after birth to prove you are not the father. After that period it doesn´t matter anymore if you are the biological father or not, according to the state you are.

"""In effect, the high court is saying it's partly Parker's fault for trusting his wife."""

who said that love is a temporary insanity curable by marriage

at all times wimin should be trusted about half as far as one can throw one