It sounds more like a slash to the arm, and the details are cut, he said they got into a struggle over a laptop, I don't know, it's not right that a man gets slashed/stabbed and is listed as the suspect, but maybe in a stupid way it was his own fault, I'm doing my Columbo here, but maybe his grip slipped and he stabbed himself? I'm just kidding of course.
It says they still remain friends, maybe it's the policeman's fault for listing him as the suspect, probably just following orders, the usual excuse.

I was assaulted by a wimyn passenger in my taxi and received as severe contution on my arm - of course the police were not interested in the slightest of my complaint but I guess if I had retaliated in any way to that cunt as she tried to punch and kick me I would have made the headlines " Taxi Driver Assaults Passenger" and I would probably have had to pay her compensation;

oh yes ! there sure is a double standard

And this is why we should stay away from Facebook and try and get out of the house every once in a while.
And also stop watching Oprah ladies, it is not OK to attack men with knives,even though Her Majesty says it is.

boyfriend: "Let me just close down my stuff and you can use the CPU."

girlfriend: "Is that your facebook?...Who's Karen?"

boyfriend: "nobody, I'm just gonna log off real qui....*Yoink*"

"You fucking stabbed me!!!"

girlfriend: "Oh HELL no!!!! You 'liked' her updated status you pig"

The idea that it can be dismissed as self-defense is really no defense at all. In legal terms, pricking somone's finger with a knife can be considered attempted murder at worst, assault with a deadly weapon at best even if it is in self-defence. In legal terms the moment on individual in affray begins to use a deadly weapon against an unarmed opponent they become the agressor unless they can prove in the most clear and undeniable terms that they were being attacked with lethal force.

Being a case of domestic violence though things are quite different, but had this happened OUTSIDE of a relationship situation the law would be applied as above.

So we see the double-standard here! People defending themselves against violent attackers (sometimes armed themselves) in life-threatening situations routinely go to jail for simply protecting themselves, and on serious charges such as (as I mentioned) attempted murder even if the 'victim' has only minor injuries. If you're a woman though, and you're having sex with your victim (or had sex at some point) weeeelllllll, suddenly things are different.

Here's a news article on the incident:
Eastside man stabbed after Facebook argument | The Indianapolis Star | IndyStar.com

Looks like she simultaneously claims both "self defense" and also "accidental" slashing -- and somehow this all occurred over two separate arguments that happened at different points in time. Riiiiiiiiiiiight...

Quote from John Dias

Here's a news article on the incident:
Eastside man stabbed after Facebook argument | The Indianapolis Star | IndyStar.com

Looks like she simultaneously claims both "self defense" and also "accidental" slashing -- and somehow this all occurred over two separate arguments that happened at different points in time. Riiiiiiiiiiiight...

The comments on the link are friggen hilarious.

I just contacted the male victim through his Facebook page. Hopefully he'll get back to me and describe the ordeal that he suffered as a result of the police naming HIM as the suspect.

This is another detail of the story. Supposedly he was punching her. I see no sign of battering in the picture: Facebook Stabbing: Man stabbed after arguing with girlfriend over Facebook page | tattletailzz.com

Typical, thanks to this bullshit feminism has been spreading women are the eternal victims. Forget the facts, forget what actually happened, just blame the man for the womans actions. This shit sickens me.

This seems like a very he-said she-said case. But apparently to the police, what "she said" is automatically more credible that what "he said." They can't seem to examine evidence without bias and misandry.

My theory is that police have a white knight complex. They see themselves as defenders, and women as people to be defended. Thus, they side with the woman in domestic disputes, rather than examining the evidence.

Quote from LeighSabio

This seems like a very he-said she-said case. But apparently to the police, what "she said" is automatically more credible that what "he said." They can't seem to examine evidence without bias and misandry.

My theory is that police have a white knight complex. They see themselves as defenders, and women as people to be defended. Thus, they side with the woman in domestic disputes, rather than examining the evidence.

That's quite possible.. but if it were that, then we can't ignore the fact that feminists give police training on DV instances and they use the 'Duluth Model' which was based on one instance of violence by a man. The DM demands that only men be held accountable for any DV - it does not include female abusers.

Its the old same ruse used over and over again.

" I KILLED HIM TO PROTECT MYSELF"

Even when he is sleeping in his bed.

NEVO

Oh. Hadn't heard of the Duluth model before.

But I do know that the whole DV issue is riddled with feminist interference. In my health class last year, we had a unit on abusive relationships which focused almost entirely on male abusers. The slides we were shown were hastily and imperfectly changed from saying "he" to saying "they" when referring to abusers, and one of the terms we had to memorize was "male privilege," which the teacher defined as "treating a woman like a servant." When I asked whether female on male cases of DV were due to "female privilege," I didn't get a good answer.

Who knows? Maybe my teacher was using the Duluth model.