Good question, Mike T. I noticed the same thing also. However, how serious can the UN be taken on any particular topic since it really doesn't seem to do much of anything other than issue reports - after debating for several years.

The UN has been set to bring in radical feminist ideas from a long way off. You are right, watch the actions and ignore the worlds. From India to Europe their actions are to undermine the family and bring in the NWO.

Because they're just forwarding an agenda. The UN needs to be done away with.

They are doing social engineering…you can find it in their briefs and meeting minutes. Whenever there is a catastrophe they try to make social changes which they encourage to stick after the disaster area settles back to normal.

They are doing this in Haiti right now where they would like women to have more power.

Over the years they've had men build house…whose title when completed can ONLY be signed over to a female. So the guy can stay or go at her pleasure and subject to her whims and of course it helps her net worth.

Right now during the present earthquake recovery they do not want to give food to men, only to women. If the guy is also present then he can help carry the food but it was issued to her. The guys are supposed to get the food from the women in their lives, if any, and if the females decide to share it, and under their terms. Wives, sisters, mothers, etc. They want women to have more power and for this to remain once things calm down.

Sickening but true.

The sheer fact that they don't answer your simple question and continue paddling fraud just proves what they are about.

I'm pretty sure you already know what they are.

There's certainly a radical feminist element at work within the UN frenziedly lobbying for ever more expansive gynocentric projects, but they are only tolerated by more powerful elements as long as they prove to be useful.

By pandering to women internationally the UN can extend the national policies of it's first-world members of disempowering the male population (the natural guardians against tyranny), which is integral to implementing a larger framework of global government ensuring the least opposition (paving the way).

Quote from Stan

They are doing social engineering…you can find it in their briefs and meeting minutes. Whenever there is a catastrophe they try to make social changes which they encourage to stick after the disaster area settles back to normal.

They are doing this in Haiti right now where they would like women to have more power.

Over the years they've had men build house…whose title when completed can ONLY be signed over to a female. So the guy can stay or go at her pleasure and subject to her whims and of course it helps her net worth.

Right now during the present earthquake recovery they do not want to give food to men, only to women. If the guy is also present then he can help carry the food but it was issued to her. The guys are supposed to get the food from the women in their lives, if any, and if the females decide to share it, and under their terms. Wives, sisters, mothers, etc. They want women to have more power and for this to remain once things calm down.

Sickening but true.

A bunch of countries rebuilding a new one is social engineering to begin with. Or foreign aid.

Of course the UN is a harbinger of a New World Order.

The NWO is an inevitability and ought to be looked forward to.

This issue is What sort of Order will it be?

What will be its 'Character'.

I would agree with anyone that a tyranny would not be in the best interests of the vast, vast majority, of either gender.

But it does not HAVE to be a tyranny.

It is the 'task' of all here to add voice to what that Character ought to be.

As for the 'women emphasis', yes I can see one and I do not like its tenor. But women have the right to just as much say in the matter of how the world is organised and run as anyone. The main efforts of the UN are not, as far as I can see, 'overemphasising' women's issues as much as underemphasising men's.

One has to remember that the 'Sovereign Nation' concept derives from the 1600's. It is a stepping stone to 'management' of regional interests and competition and hubris that resulted in the two world wars. It NEEDS to be replaced.

The UN was established as a 'talking shop. "Jaw-Jaw instead of War-War" said Churchill.

But including everyone and his dog, dictators and lunatics along with more sensible Statesman was a huge error.

The UN needs replacing with a 'Supra-National' body that can do a lot more than simply act as Hypocrit Central.

I would, were I an immensly powerful voice, create a World Rescue and Relief Organisation that binds the people's and Governments of the World in a common humanitarian pupose, with muscle. Disaster is such a unifying need.