The two villages where mothers killed EVERY baby born a boy for ten years

**frostyboy** · 1st-December-2008

From the Daily Mail: The two villages where mothers killed EVERY baby born a boy for ten years

The Papua New Guinea jungle has given up one of its darkest secrets - the systematic slaughter of every male baby born in two villages to prevent future tribal clashes.

By virtually wiping out the 'male stock', tribal women hope they can avoid deadly bow-and-arrow wars between the villages in the future.

'Babies grow into men and men turn into warriors,' said Rona Luke, a village wife who is attending a special 'peace and reconciliation' meeting in the mountain village of Goroka.

'It's because of the terrible fights that have brought death and destruction to our villages for the past 20 years that all the womenfolk have agreed to have all new-born male babies killed,' said Mrs Luke.

'The women have had enough of men engaging in tribal conflicts and bringing misery to them.'

The sensational claims recall the Biblical story of the Old Testament pharaoh who ordered all midwives to kill Israelite baby boys because he wanted to ensure there were never enough young men to fight in an army against the Egyptians.

Mrs Luke said that the village women agreed that if they stopped producing males, allowing only female babies to survive, their tribe's stock of boys would go down and there would be no men in future to fight.

A resident of Agibu village, Mrs Luke said she did not know how many male babies were killed by being smothered, but it had happened to all males over a 10 year period - and she suggested it was still happening.

Choking back tears she added: 'It's a terrible, unbearable crime, but the women had to do it.

'The women have really being forced into it as it's the only means available to them as women to bring an end to tribal fights.'

Confirming the shocking infanticide claims, Mrs Kipiyona Belas from the rival Amosa village, told a newspaper that getting food for their families was difficult because husbands were fighting other tribes with bows-and- arrows and spears.

Often the men did not come back, having been killed on the 'battle field', usually a clearing in the jungle.

Now, with the help of the Salvation Army and the initiative of local Pastor Michael Hemuno, the tribal women hope the slaughter of babies can end and those men who are still warriors will lay down their weapons and talk peace.

'We are trying to get them to live peacefully and end all the deaths of young and old,' said Pastor Hemuno.

Tribal fighting in the region of Gimi, in the country's Eastern Highlands, has been going on since 1986, many of the clashes arising over claims of sorcery.

Papua New Guinea tribes, who dress up in warrior paint and feathered finery for special occasions, are strong believers in sorcery and often blame their enemies for bringing about deaths through witchcraft.

**Feckless** · 1st-December-2008

I bet someone is already thinking about introducing this parctice to the west....it may already been signed by Harman and consorts...

**Male-Rights-Network** · 1st-December-2008

Its positively Amazonian, isnt it?

The femjourno for the Daily Mail attempts to reflect the blame for this male infanticide onto men ("prevent tribal clashes"), but I dont think this can just be taken to be the case. Rather, it could simply be a case of Matriarchy. Because of a Matriarchal/Feminist culture, they slaughter males, simple as.

Thats the way it was in the Amazon tribes anyway.

**Percy** · 1st-December-2008

Not that I believe it, just because the Daily mail prints it, but let's see, These women were 'forced' into it were they? By..... ?

To stop men killing one another, they kill off male babies. Hmmmmm. Well it can't be that they think killing is bad.

There is no mention of the 'deadly bow and arrow fights' coming into the village and harming the women and children. No bombs raining down on the ladies. No huts going up in flames and bodies littering main street. The chaps go off to a clearing for a bit of blood sport. So what are the women complaining about?

Could it be that a dead man cannot provide? If they aren't there to provide than they are no use to women. So get rid of males altogether is a plan???

It takes a village, eh. It takes a village to murder all male babies. Did someone tell Hillary about this lot some years back?

It sounds to me as though a collective low-level hysteria has taken over their minds, or some Queen Bee type with a grudge has led all the other women down a weedy garden path.

'It's a terrible, unbearable crime, but the women had to do it.

Where have I heard that before. "Its terrible; its unbearable; thank goodness it hurts you more than it hurts me".

**christianj** · 1st-December-2008

'It's a terrible, unbearable crime, but the women had to do it

.

The best hypocrisy is justified when perpetrated by women..

Murdering is justified in the context that men do it too..

Fascinating, they have murder down to a tee..

Just suffocate them..

We can kill them ourselves..

I just love the way women justify murdering their young, it's okay..

But whoa and behold if their hubbies do the same thing..

Abortions are justified in the same fashion, there has to be a reason to murder the young..

I just wonder what would happen when those "tribes" find out that there are villages with only women ?

**Stan** · 1st-December-2008

The USA kills about 600,000-750,000 baby boys each year. And a similar number of girls. Obama wants the rest of the world to do more of the same. So in a time of Economic stress and limited resources...he plans to sign executive orders DAY ONE to get that started.

**christianj** · 1st-December-2008

Imagine the feast with an all female tribe..

I do not want to know the end result, thank you..

**Arbalest** · 1st-December-2008

How typical. Instead of directly facing down the violence they pick on babies that can't fight back. Babies that could be taught that fighting is wrong and peace is better.How lazy and cowardly of these women, they're even more violent than the men. And they can't even own up to the fact of their cowardly ways, they blame it on what the babies "could" be.

**chevalier** · 1st-December-2008

So they are going to end men killing men by killing then first?

This is the logic that could only be employed by women.

"Lets kill the innocent before the can become guilty" Hmmm