Quote from Douglas

Only if you are willing to fall for the feminist myth that men have no power.

If you give up without a fight, don't be surprised to lose.

I've always heard them say men are the ones in power....

Quote from Popadibs

I've always heard them say men are the ones in power....

You and I both know that their talking out of their snatch when they say that.

Quote from Popadibs

I've always heard them say men are the ones in power....

His ass is on crack or something. Evidently the old fools brain is deteriorated. The only thing his ass wants to preserve is pussy. That is why he grovels to and constantly agree with the females on this website, and I don't care if he sees my comments. In his opinion the only thing I tend to spout is hate speech. His ass is sorry.

Quote from Zuberi

You and I both know that their talking out of their snatch when they say that.

Both of you aren't the only ones that know that. I know that shit as well. Evidently I am trying incite a Gender War, when it was women, particularly feminists that started it.

Just like with women hitting men being ignored (or treated as comedy), this too is only wrong if it is a man shouting at a woman.

My sense is that

(1) It won't be applied to women.

(2) Many men won't return to an otherwise viable marriage due to the massive sense of violation of being removed from their homes.

They have pilot projects in the UK, NZ and Australia removing men for essentially doing this all ready. Reading between the lines of one of the reports from NZ many men aren't returning.

Well if the implications of this legal decision weren't so serious I'd say this would probably be the most damn funny thing I've heard. Shouting is now domestic violence? I mean Clinton did a pretty damn good job of stringing along the judge with definitions but this is truly genius. As comical as this is, this actually has nothing to do with shouting. Its all back down to the same principles us antifeminists, MRA's, whatever you want to call yourself. Its the same idea we're fighting against, the absurd political correctness that says men are demons and women are angels, therefore women are incapable of doing evil and only men do evil, therefore we must never punish women and only punish men because repeat cycle. And thats what this is, because of this bullshit that never gets challenged or questioned we automatically assume that the man is acting violent, didn't she even say the women was afraid that he "might" take her kids away. How is that grounds for domestic violence? This is utter nonsense, that judge needs to be removed, this isn't justice, this is feminist vendetta.

Quote from wohodude100

Well if the implications of this legal decision weren't so serious I'd say this would probably be the most damn funny thing I've heard. Shouting is now domestic violence? I mean Clinton did a pretty damn good job of stringing along the judge with definitions but this is truly genius. As comical as this is, this actually has nothing to do with shouting. Its all back down to the same principles us antifeminists, MRA's, whatever you want to call yourself. Its the same idea we're fighting against, the absurd political correctness that says men are demons and women are angels, therefore women are incapable of doing evil and only men do evil, therefore we must never punish women and only punish men because repeat cycle. And thats what this is, because of this bullshit that never gets challenged or questioned we automatically assume that the man is acting violent, didn't she even say the women was afraid that he "might" take her kids away. How is that grounds for domestic violence? This is utter nonsense, that judge needs to be removed, this isn't justice, this is feminist vendetta.

If you look at it another way, it basically means arguing with your wife is the same as decking her with a hay maker. I never thought any man could verbally kick some woman's ass?

Look, it's like this. The Daily Mail article was inaccurate (although they did get it right when they said the Judgement was in the Supreme Court). There have been a number of complaints to the Press Commission. The Judgement has not changed Family Law in any way, shape or form and was based on existing Law. The only outcome of this judgement has been a clarification and a reiteration of what the housing act already has to say concerning applications as homeless on the part of people suffering abuse from their spouses.

The result is that the council have to reconsider an earlier decision not to accommodate a woman under homelessness legislation because their decision was based on the wrong information. It will not result in the man concerned having to lose his home.

Maybe I'm the only person joining the thread who is sad enough to have read it, but it wouldn't have harmed if the Daily Mail had given that a go.

Quote from Unregistered

Look, it's like this. The Daily Mail article was inaccurate (although they did get it right when they said the Judgement was in the Supreme Court). There have been a number of complaints to the Press Commission. The Judgement has not changed Family Law in any way, shape or form and was based on existing Law. The only outcome of this judgement has been a clarification and a reiteration of what the housing act already has to say concerning applications as homeless on the part of people suffering abuse from their spouses.

The result is that the council have to reconsider an earlier decision not to accommodate a woman under homelessness legislation because their decision was based on the wrong information. It will not result in the man concerned having to lose his home.

Maybe I'm the only person joining the thread who is sad enough to have read it, but it wouldn't have harmed if the Daily Mail had given that a go.

Now that the court has decided that she suffered DV,under new rules for Housing association and council housing,the man can be removed from the tenancy agreement,thus losing his home,and she can take it over,he will not be rehoused,that is the reality,so try to keep up and not be so smug,your wrong.

Quote from Redpill

There is nothing domestically violent about shouting. What the fuck is this? The courts needs to keep out of the lives of men and women. This is insane, these motherfuckers are nothing but a bunch of fucking morons. I should have known that this took place in the United Queendom. This is bullshit.

I agree to some extent. Whilst I find this shocking and hope to god it never comes to pass, I have to disagree regarding the abuse of constant shouting. Both my brothers and I were constantly worn down by our mothers screaming at us. All 3 of us still carry the mental scars.

And after spending some time this evening reading, researching and thinking, I'm sorry to say I think that you are all right in your assumption that if this comes to pass, men will be the ones to get the brunt of it all

The definition of 'Abuse' changes to suit the needs of the Woman.

If the Woman is violent to the Man then she is violent because he was being 'Mentally abusive' giving her the RIGHT to be physically abusive.

If the Woman can't prove that the Man has been physically abusive then the Woman will claim emotional abuse which can include any of the following.

Looking at other Women (He should be blinkered at all times)

Having friends other than her relatives (Enjoying other peoples company is a no no)

Not watching what she wants on the telly (You've got to empathise with her)

Disagreeing with her (She demands that she's right ALL the time)

When a Court has agreed that you have done any of the above it's acceptable and right that the Man can comfortably be called a bad Father....remember it's ok if your ex hates you with a passion, but you've got to love and respect the MOTHER of your children.

Fucking nonsense.

Yes, shouting has been considered to be Domestic Violence in the USA for many years. It's in the Violence Against Women Act, VAWA. Not only that, but other non-violent things are now considered to be violence too. For instance if a man calmly asks that his wife hold back on so many shoe purchases per day then this too is violence. Meanwhile their finances could be screwed.

Thankfully relatively few women realize some of these points.

All it really takes is a female to complain and then the guy is in an indefensible position. Yet there was no violence or inappropriate behavior.

It's like someone dislikes mainstream marriage and relationships or wants governments control of everything or something.

People should be allowed to say whatever they want, at whatever tone they please in their own house.

I expect much abuse of this law to kick the spouse (usually the boyfriend or husband) out of the house to gain control of all the assets.

This law is completely unnecessary too, because if a couple dislike each other so much, they can file for divorce, and live elsewhere at any time.

Shouting should never be considered domestic violence at all. It's very hard to prove and easy to fabricate lies.

It will cause much harm and unnecessary breakdown of families across the United Kingdom.

Man, I am SO glad that I don't have to put up with anyone shouting at me- law against it, or no. It's liberating to live in relative peace.