Good one, Pops!

Quote from Zuberi

Good one, Pops!

I'm going to post more videos as proof of what they're like but this just isn't at the top of my priority list.

Great...

As I said in the replies to the 1st video, the woman is effectively saying that it's fine for a child to abuse a woman and she must not defend herself.

Well, let's see how that goes down with women LOL

Quote from Marx

As I said in the replies to the 1st video, the woman is effectively saying that it's fine for a child to abuse a woman and she must not defend herself.

Well, let's see how that goes down with women LOL

Cool, I'm going to find a 17-year-old guy, to be my Bodyguard against women.......

In the third video, even though she is saying that the guy was right to tell the police, she repeats "he can't hit her back."

Rubbish.

If he needed to defend himself, he can choose to hit her back. If he did not need to defend himself (for example, she hits and then retreats) then he has no need to hit her back but also no need to accept such behaviour.

If she needed to defend herself, she can choose to hit him back. If she did not need to defend herself (for example, he hits and then retreats) then she has no need to hit him back but also no need to accept such behaviour.

See? It's easy - it works both ways around.

Using this logic that women are applying in such a self-serving manner, there is no reason for the USA (nor the UK or other Western countries) to be involved in the "war against terror" nor Afghanistan.

I mean, the USA is HUGE and it has very, very powerful armies.

So along comes Osama Bin Laden and trains some infidel to force a plane into the Twin Towers...

Now this Osama Bin Laden guy is only small fry compared to the American government and military, so surely - using the logic that women and American laws apply upon men - the USA should NEVER have retaliated against him. Same with Iraq, same with Falklands and all the other wars that the USA has been dabbling in over the years.

[ps- for American readers, please take this post IN CONTEXT - I am not slating America, I am simply applying the logic on a larger scale (government/military) to similar standards as is applied on the individual scale of a man being hit by a woman]

Yes if a women hits a man then he has the RIGHT to DEFEND himself because this is no moral or just law that says one half of the human race can not DEFEND it'self from an attack by the other half of the human race.

of course men should not hit women-but women should not hit men

i swear-if a woman ever hits me again-i will drop her like the sack of shit she is

it would even be better if she has a man backing her-because he will get it also

all women are,"tough",till they get a taste of what they hand out

never ceases to amaze me how some people ask for something then realize they didn't really want what they were askin for

when i used to go to the pub and it was closing time-everyone outside waiting for rides etc

it was the women who started the brawls(with back-up of course)-they hit with impunity knowing damn well most guys won't dare hit back-and this is exacly why they do it-they "feel" tough.

she can lay a beating on you or someone else and if he hits back he is the abuser?

i don't think so.....but in the land of feminazi we all know darn well who is in trouble

Quote from outdoors

of course men should not hit women-but women should not hit men

i swear-if a woman ever hits me again-i will drop her like the sack of shit she is

it would even be better if she has a man backing her-because he will get it also

all women are,"tough",till they get a taste of what they hand out

never ceases to amaze me how some people ask for something then realize they didn't really want what they were askin for

when i used to go to the pub and it was closing time-everyone outside waiting for rides etc

it was the women who started the brawls(with back-up of course)-they hit with impunity knowing damn well most guys won't dare hit back-and this is exacly why they do it

I hear what you are saying Bro and it's bullshit all the way around and most likely the only reason why women have men as back up is because she promises to give them a nob gobbling or that the men thing they'll get her ass if they back her up.

No one should hit anyone, but I think if a woman is willing to dish something out, she is fully capable of taking it too.

A man should be able to hit a female in self defense, without worrying about the femdom cops. Like a woman has a right to defend herself.

If you are big enough to hit some one, you are big enough to get hit back.

Quote from Lady Catherine

No one should hit anyone, but I think if a woman is willing to dish something out, she is fully capable of taking it too.

Agreed

These days, assuming there were no witnesses, and she didn't know who I was (which probably wouldn't be the case, however), I probably WOULD hit back, with what I judged to be equal force. I've always been told that I'm a really nice guy, but I'm not a mug, and some people need to be bought down a peg or two; and given how infrequently such women who hit men will ever receive their comeuppance, I'd actually see it as particularly important, to retaliate. Only then will such women stop abusing men who feel unable to defend themselves.

An eye for an eye, I say. I'm a promoted of 'intergender-violence equality'..........