Self-Control: A Masculine Quality
This is a discussion on Self-Control: A Masculine Quality within the Discrimination & Sexist Double Standards anti misandry forums, part of the Why We're Here category; Self-Control: A Masculine Quality by Female Masculinist on October 21, 2009 Not long ago, a feminist I know slightly was ...
- 22nd-October-2009 #1
Self-Control: A Masculine Quality
Self-Control: A Masculine Quality
by Female Masculinist on October 21, 2009
Not long ago, a feminist I know slightly was venting on her blog about pro-lifers. “What are women who don’t want to have children supposed to do, keep their legs together?” she demanded sarcastically.
Well, yes. That is what has been expected of women throughout history, that they keep their legs together when the results of not doing so would be bad. And this is precisely what was expected of George Sodini, and of men whose dates get undressed and rub their dicks and then say no at the last minute. Why is this considered such an unreasonable demand?
But it is. So is stating that women should not be allowed to abandon their husbands and turn their children over to second husbands or boyfriends who will abuse them. Feminists seem to believe that when a woman gets wet, she has no self-control whatever. Her clothes evaporate and her knees fling themselves apart with no volition on her part. If she is already married to someone else, her legs, without consulting her, march her into the new man’s bed of their own accord, and her hands grip the children she already has and drags them with her, all without her having the slightest control over any of it. When a woman’s gina tingles, she can only follow its commands! Expecting her to act ethically when she’s wet is absurd!
Female criminals also just can’t help themselves. A woman who makes false rape accusations “is a very troubled young woman in need of much help.” If nine out of ten incidents of civilian parents with military spouses abusing their children while the spouse is on deployment, this isn’t because women are less moral, it’s because “men may be more likely to get help from extended family or other resources”. Recently a teenage girl set fire to a church with fifty people in it. But no one should behave as if she were responsible for her actions: “Fire officials said the goal is to make sure that the girl receives counseling, not to necessarily punish her.” If women who do bad things, it’s other people’s fault for not giving her enough “help” and “support”.
This is the feminist theory: women are never responsible for their own actions and thus the men and children around them must endure whatever they dish out – murder by abortion, physical attacks, impoverishment, etc. – and protect them from the consequences.
Feminists also, of course, believe that men have unlimited self-control. Rape laws, for example, say that having sex with a drunk woman is rape, even if she got herself drunk before even meeting the rapist. There is no extenuation if the man is drunk too. So women not only are legally held to lack the self-control to refrain from getting drunk – or maybe the law just figures that women are too stupid to figure out that if they keep knocking back appletinis, it will cloud their judgment – but a man who is similarly blotto is supposed to retain the discernment to tell if the woman rubbing herself all over him is drunk.
When I posted about how free women feel today to provoke men beyond reasonable endurance, at my wordpress backup a passing feminist declared: “There is no time that you can blame someone else for becoming physical in a domestic relationship (outside of self-defense). You cannot ‘make someone angry enough…..’ to hit. Adults are responsible for having control over their reactions and if they choose to become violent, it’s a CHOICE and if they make that choice, they deserve punishment. Period. Basically your post reads as ‘boys will be boys’ which is total horseshit.”
Notice that this commenter made no suggestion that Katharine Hepburn ought to have controlled her own actions and not destroyed Cary Grant’s property. Self-control is for men!
Men, it seems, can endure any provocation, betrayal or abuse without ever giving in to the urge to retaliate. Women, on the other hand, are so utterly at the mercy of their impulses that they must be permitted to murder the children they conceive, have other people arrested for not babysitting them after they have gotten themselves drunk, and given counseling rather than punishment if they commit a crime in which other people are injured or killed.
Feminists believe that men have infinitely more self-control than women. Luckily for them, they’re right.
Since feminists are so adamant that women never be held responsible for their own actions, let us take them at their word. Let us bar women from entering into contracts, being employed in jobs in which they bear more responsibility than a teenager flipping burgers, or having custody of children.
Self-Control: A Masculine Quality
- 22nd-October-2009 # ADS
Advertisement Circuit advertisement- Member Since
- Always
- Location
- Advertising world
- Posts
- Many
- 22nd-October-2009 #2
Re: Self-Control: A Masculine Quality
You know, I've never thought about that. They always say that women should be allowed to wear whatever clothes they want, go where ever they want, no matter how dangerous a neighborhood or how slutty the apparel because men should control themselves. But when the shoe is on the other foot, they act like self discipline is an infringement on their freedom. That's a double standard.
- 23rd-October-2009 #3
Re: Self-Control: A Masculine Quality
A lot of sound points and examples, Shagda, but there is a wonky foundation stone in the wall.
The implication is this: Feminists have decided that self-control is a masculine quality.
What is wrong with this view?
There is a huge volume of feminist encouragement to women to abandon any vestige of self-control, but that speaks to that self-control being gender neutral. There is nothing inherently masculine about it. It is simply a human attribute, and learned / developed at that.
Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum
Love the Sinner but not the Sin.
(St. Augustine)
“ For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers,
against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. “
(and within ourselves)
(Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)
A Feminist is a human being who has lost her way and turned vicious.
If you meet one on the road as you Go your Own Way,
offer kindness but keep your sword drawn.
(Me)
-
- 23rd-October-2009 #5
Re: Self-Control: A Masculine Quality
Even those who have "lesser" mental disability's are expected to be able to control them self.
I'm short on time atm, got to work shortly so Ill get back to this latter
LinkBacks (?)
- 16th-April-2011, 02:03 PM
You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?
-
Men get poorer quality sleep
By chris1970 in forum Men's HealthReplies: 8Last Post: 5th-October-2009, 06:51 AM -
The Orgasmic quality of leather Wallets.By Percy in forum StupidityReplies: 4Last Post: 19th-January-2009, 12:03 AM -
A priest a masculine man
By Dr David Banner in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 2Last Post: 2nd-February-2007, 06:15 PM -
Testosterone ups quality of life in men with AD
By Marx in forum Chit chat (MAIN)Replies: 1Last Post: 21st-February-2006, 08:45 PM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks








Reply With Quote







Bookmarks