Disgusting behaviour - but it's "only men" who are being humiliated by the admin office of the school... so it's no surprise to see the academia world promoting this.

Can you imagine if they made female students wear fake testicles with electronic shocks attached and men 'joke' around by activating the shocks - the aim being to teach them that playing 'whack-a-sack' isn't acceptable..

Of course it wouldn't happen... hitting men in the groin is hilarious (TV tells us this) and humiliating women isn't acceptable behaviour (TV also tells us this).

How about making Muslim students "Walk A Mile In Their Yarmulkes"? According to made up statistics, 1 in 4 non-Muslims are killed in terrorist attacks, and Muslims are the only ones who ever commit acts of terrorism according to crude stereotypes, so it's totally acceptable making Muslims pledge to a crowd that they will not blow up our airlines.

Or maybe blacks can promise not to mug innocent whites to steal crack money, because all violent crime is committed by blacks. Over 346% of all white students are killed to death by blacks in college.

Quote from Mateusz

Or maybe blacks can promise not to mug innocent whites to steal crack money, because all violent crime is committed by blacks. Over 346% of all white students are killed to death by blacks in college.

I don't know if I can keep that promise. It's too damned fun.

'The crowd of marching men were subjected to demeaning slurs from the crowd of onlookers and given hand written notes from members of a virtually all female audience implying their complicity in the supposed sexual assault epidemic. “Female students stood on the side lines. Over 400 male students wore heals and walked in a 1/4 mile circle, four times while the female students stood and watched, mostly smiling and some were laughing.

Honestly?

So let's see if I got this right, guys walk in a circle wearing painful shoes while a bunch of wymyn verbally abuse them, and for no reason whatsoever.
I would like to make a comment on this, but all of it is so far beyond any logical sense that I can't even start a beginning.

And feminists say that women aren't capable of violence, and if they act that way, it's only in self-defense. And that they are never abusive either.

Yeah, sure, okay

This cant be true can it? I am convinced somebody did a mind read-sleeping test on David Furtelle and this is what they saw him dreaming...

I am appalled at how gullible these manginas are. Rape is never acceptable... And neither should social castration be either...


Wonder which number randomizing program they used to come up with the stat's?

Now come on chaps, the is the "New Woman" and a fine example of narcissism and obnoxiousness it is too. Best those guys find out early that these are the women they should avoid at all cost in the future. Then we'll have all that hand-wringing about "Where have the good men gone" and they seriously ask that question without having any idea why they have been relegated to plague status..
It does make any other females, from any other country, look absolutely human doesn't it..

Looks like the "shoes" (i.e. lifestyle) the men are forced to wear are a hell of a lot more painful than those the women get to choose or not, depending on their preference.

From the 'walk a mile in her shoes' facebook page...
Walk a Mile in Her Shoes® | Facebook

A comment by a pro-feminist:

Quote from Vickie Phan

Vickie Phan
"A lot of people accuse feminists of thinking that all men are rapists. That’s not true. But do you know who think all men are rapists?
Rapists do.
They really do. In psychological study, the profiling, the studies, it comes out again and again.
Virtually all rapists genuinely believe that all men rape, and other men just keep it hushed up better."

Wear A White Ribbon | Edinburgh Eye

To which I left my reply:

Quote from me

So given that feminists promote these sexist and bigoted events to prevent rape, we see that feminists view all men as *potential* rapists, just as rapists see all men as potential rapists. Why am I not surprised to learn that men capable of rape & feminists think along similar lines?

Another comment from the same page:

A one mile walk doesn’t seem so bad, does it? That’s all you have to do to support the Victoria Women's Sexual Assault Centre at the Walk a Mile in Her Shoes® event on May 12th.

Oh wait – men, you'll have to wear women’s shoes!

To which I replied:

In the name of equality, let's have a 'wear a noose around your neck day' at work, where women have to dress in similarly oppressive clothes as men do instead of their free-reign on work-place attire?

I don't get it. I really don't understand this, on so many levels.

Many women choose to wear high heels. They don't have to. If they do, it is by their own choice and no-one will deny them anything if they make a different choice.

We are told by the slut walks that what a woman wears has no relation to whether she will be sexually assaulted, so why should men need to hurt themselves wearing stupid footwear to prove, er, to prove, um .. well, next point.

Why are these men doing this. They were "made" to? Really? All it takes for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. It's a pity none of them were good men. What would have happened if they all refused, or even just 10% of them refused.

Why are any men willing to go to that university. ALL men should boycott it from now on.

But back to the stupidity of all this. Even if one is gullible enough to actually believe that only women suffer sexual assault; even if one is so ignorant and uninformed (these ARE the "well educated" people, yes?) as to believe that only men commit sexual assault; even if one is so stupid as to think that demeaning a man in front of women will make that man LESS likely to harm women; even if all of that .. what has walking around in high heel shoes to do with sexual assault.

What?

WHAT??

Quote from Douglas

I don't get it. I really don't understand this, on so many levels.

Many women choose to wear high heels. They don't have to. If they do, it is by their own choice and no-one will deny them anything if they make a different choice.

We are told by the slut walks that what a woman wears has no relation to whether she will be sexually assaulted, so why should men need to hurt themselves wearing stupid footwear to prove, er, to prove, um .. well, next point.

Why are these men doing this. They were "made" to? Really? All it takes for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. It's a pity none of them were good men. What would have happened if they all refused, or even just 10% of them refused.

Why are any men willing to go to that university. ALL men should boycott it from now on.

But back to the stupidity of all this. Even if one is gullible enough to actually believe that only women suffer sexual assault; even if one is so ignorant and uninformed (these ARE the "well educated" people, yes?) as to believe that only men commit sexual assault; even if one is so stupid as to think that demeaning a man in front of women will make that man LESS likely to harm women; even if all of that .. what has walking around in high heel shoes to do with sexual assault.

What?

WHAT??

Hey, some women even choose to wear "combat boots".

Maybe some of these guy's should have handcuff's on?

Time for these women to walk in men's shoes,victim's of false allegation's-injured on the job,etc.....

This could go on for-ever.

If I was forced to ever do such a walk for women in their shoes-I would wear a princess outfit with a sign on my neck that reads "entitled".

So this crap actually happened? Did no male students even protest this female chauvinist crap??

What about walking a mile in his shoes?? Let 400 women be falsely accused of rape and then kicked out of college even though they did nothing wrong. When will that march start?