Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
This is a discussion on Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair! within the Discrimination & Sexist Double Standards anti misandry forums, part of the Why We're Here category; Boy loses challenge to underage sex laws Boy loses challenge to underage sex laws - The Irish Times - Fri, ...
-
Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
Boy loses challenge to underage sex laws Boy loses challenge to underage sex laws - The Irish Times - Fri, Feb 24, 2012
----------
Good to see the Irish Society of Prevention of Cruelty to Children (ISPCC) not agree:
‘Romeo and Juliet’ sex ruling shows inequality of law – charity ‘Romeo and Juliet’ sex ruling shows inequality of law – charity · TheJournal.ie
- 27th-February-2012 # ADS
Advertisement Circuit advertisement- Member Since
- Always
- Posts
- Many
-
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
Feminist gate-keepers at the ready?
Below seems like a fancy way to say "It's ok to punish men harsher for identical crimes than women... because they're men and for no other reason whatsoever.When he took a challenge to his prosecution in the High Court, he claimed he was being discriminated against on grounds of sex because the girl had not been charged when he was. Ms Justice Elizabeth Dunne dismissed his challenge.
Article 40.1 recognises that applying the same treatment to all is not always desirable because it could lead to indirect inequality because of different circumstances in which people find themselves, she said. Some of the differences between people, particularly in relation to capacity, are inherent and most obviously between sexes.Why bother when the law enforcers clearly promote discrimination against one sex; men?...it follows that laws such as in this case were not examples of the State holding men or women unequal before the law, she said.
However, they will not protect men from the dangers our early sexual activity. Only men are being held accountable & responsible while women are given a free pass to do as they please, knowing only men will be punished... as is typical.The framing of sexual offences in such a way as to protect the young from dangers of early sexual activity was a matter of notorious difficulty, she said.
Just incredible.The court also rejected arguments in relation to his European Convention rights to a private life, including a sexual life, and his right to a fair trial on grounds of gender. He had not sought a declaration that the law was incompatible with the State’s obligations under the convention, the Chief Justice noted.►My blog / Your Blog
►Generic Rules
►FaceBook App
Wife : "I dreamt they were auctioning off dicks. The big ones went for ten dollars and the thick ones went for twenty dollars."
Husband : "How about the ones like mine?"
Wife : "Those they gave away."
Husband : "I had a dream too...I dreamt they were auctioning off pussy. The pretty ones went for a thousand dollars, and the little tight ones went for two thousand."
Wife : "And how much for the ones like mine?"
Husband : "That's where they held the auction."
-
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
So a 15 year old boy having sex with a 14 year old girl is illegal?
How about a 15 year old girl having sex with a 13 year old boy? A 16 year old girl having sex with a 14 year old boy? The way the law was just interpreted the boy would be guilty of a criminal sexual offense.
This is just pure misandric madness in the Irish Supreme court. I really empathize with our young lads these days. They get fucked over by the system for doing what boys do and for merely being boys.
I don't know how, but we have to destroy this mess the feminists have created.
Under the Irish Supreme Courts ruling I would be convicted because when I was 16 years old and had sex with a girl who was 15 years, 10 months old. Dinosaurs and sabre toothed Tigers were still roaming the earth back then.
A whopping misandric double standard of epic magnitude.According to the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2006, sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 17 is a crime, but a girl who has sex while aged under 17 is not guilty of any offence.
The law ONLY criminalizes the BOY. The girls can get away with shagging every boy within miles and not be held accountable for anything. Nothing in the girls actions would be considered "criminal" simply because she is a weak, feeble minded female who the state needs to take care of.“Yes, of course girls are the ones that get pregnant,” she said. “But then it’s about what supports does that girl need, as opposed to criminalising one part of the relationship. And so will the father need support. But we’re trying to prevent children from having underage sex by criminalising them.”
The court ruling isn't only Misandric, it's extremely sexist and misogyny at it's core.
No wonder boys feel the need to riot, smash things, and loot. The courts and laws fuck them over. The school system with it's feminist indoctrination alienates them. The politically correct vilify them.
There truly is a WAR AGAINST BOYS taking place. So what can we do about it? We've got to get quite noisy about the situation and get some political actions started.
If we don't speak up, the alternative is unthinkable.Last edited by The Possible Human; 27th-February-2012 at 07:08 AM.
-
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
How many feminists will be complaining of this double standard?
►My blog / Your Blog
►Generic Rules
►FaceBook App
Wife : "I dreamt they were auctioning off dicks. The big ones went for ten dollars and the thick ones went for twenty dollars."
Husband : "How about the ones like mine?"
Wife : "Those they gave away."
Husband : "I had a dream too...I dreamt they were auctioning off pussy. The pretty ones went for a thousand dollars, and the little tight ones went for two thousand."
Wife : "And how much for the ones like mine?"
Husband : "That's where they held the auction."
- 27th-February-2012 #5
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
We're constantly reminded that girls mature faster than boys. There is therefore a case for making the age of criminal responsibilty LOWER for girls, not higher.
But don't hold your breath.Feminism : The world's most effective contraceptive.
-
- 27th-February-2012 #7
- 27th-February-2012 #8
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
For some time, I've questioned as to how the feminists think that INequality can equal equality; and to counter this, they have now come up with "indirect inequality". Brilliant! "Indirect inequality; serving feminists' equality/inequality double standards since 2012!".Article 40.1 recognises that applying the same treatment to all is not always desirable because it could lead to indirect inequality.....
Equal, where it suits; UNequal, where it suits. *Yawns*.Some of the differences between people, particularly in relation to capacity, are inherent and most obviously between sexes."There are lies, damned lies, and there are feministic statistics". Myself
"Behind every bitch, is a FEMINIST who made her that way....". Myself
- 27th-February-2012 #9
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
-
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
An interesting point about this is case and ruling is that it relates to a 2006 law i.e. it isn't a very old law.
-
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
One can listen to a representative of the Rape Crisis Network welcome the ruling at Today FM Media Player (22:00 or so). This is from an Irish national radio station.
-
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
"Teenage girls are immune from prosecution"
The basic logic is that because a girl can choose to get pregnant and has all the power in her hands (abortion, give birth, allow the father to have a relationship with their child or disallow the father), then only males should be prosecuted.
This doesn't make any sense.. it's just blatant sexism as promoted by feminists.►My blog / Your Blog
►Generic Rules
►FaceBook App
Wife : "I dreamt they were auctioning off dicks. The big ones went for ten dollars and the thick ones went for twenty dollars."
Husband : "How about the ones like mine?"
Wife : "Those they gave away."
Husband : "I had a dream too...I dreamt they were auctioning off pussy. The pretty ones went for a thousand dollars, and the little tight ones went for two thousand."
Wife : "And how much for the ones like mine?"
Husband : "That's where they held the auction."
-
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
Read this Toy Solider?
This is absurd... I am freaked out by the whole thing.
- 27th-February-2012 #14
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
The excuse of pregnancy cannot be considered reasonable until they stop making men and boys pay child support for children that they were tricked into, or even as a result of female-on-male rape.
-
Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!
So a mature sophisticated 16 yr old girl can seduce a 12yr old boy for reasons of personal gratification and be immune from prosecution. In fact he is liable to prosecution and in fact she can complain to the police.
So in short, in Ireland girls can have sex at any age, boys cannot. Wow.Last edited by Xxavier; 27th-February-2012 at 10:01 PM.
You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?
-
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Fathers are InferiorBy zetamale in forum Feminist/ MisandryReplies: 4Last Post: 22nd-June-2011, 01:50 AM -
Brazilian Supreme Court rules in favor of David Goldman in custody case
By Zuberi in forum Marriage/Divorce, Children, Choice for MenReplies: 1Last Post: 23rd-December-2009, 10:37 AM -
The Boys Project: An examination of how boys & young men fair in feminized education
By TheSharpenedPen in forum Discrimination & Sexist Double StandardsReplies: 0Last Post: 28th-October-2007, 05:56 PM -
Court rules boy can't compete on girls' squad
By Tyrael in forum Discrimination & Sexist Double StandardsReplies: 5Last Post: 3rd-December-2006, 11:43 AM




15Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks








Reply With Quote








Bookmarks