Hello and welcome to our community! Is this your first visit?
Register
Please register or sign in to remove these advertisements.
+ Have your say...
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21
Like Tree15Likes

Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

This is a discussion on Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair! within the Discrimination & Sexist Double Standards anti misandry forums, part of the Why We're Here category; Boy loses challenge to underage sex laws Boy loses challenge to underage sex laws - The Irish Times - Fri, ...

  1. #1
    AnIrishGuy's Avatar
    AnIrishGuy is offline Silver Supporter
    Member Since
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    52
    My Blog Entries:
    1

    Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!


    Boy loses challenge to underage sex laws Boy loses challenge to underage sex laws - The Irish Times - Fri, Feb 24, 2012

    ----------
    Good to see the Irish Society of Prevention of Cruelty to Children (ISPCC) not agree:
    ‘Romeo and Juliet’ sex ruling shows inequality of law – charity ‘Romeo and Juliet’ sex ruling shows inequality of law – charity · TheJournal.ie

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement Circuit advertisement
    Member Since
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     
  3. #2
    Marx's Avatar
    Marx is offline Administrator
    Member Since
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    20,143
    My Blog Entries:
    33

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    Feminist gate-keepers at the ready?

    When he took a challenge to his prosecution in the High Court, he claimed he was being discriminated against on grounds of sex because the girl had not been charged when he was. Ms Justice Elizabeth Dunne dismissed his challenge.
    Below seems like a fancy way to say "It's ok to punish men harsher for identical crimes than women... because they're men and for no other reason whatsoever.
    Article 40.1 recognises that applying the same treatment to all is not always desirable because it could lead to indirect inequality because of different circumstances in which people find themselves, she said. Some of the differences between people, particularly in relation to capacity, are inherent and most obviously between sexes.
    ...it follows that laws such as in this case were not examples of the State holding men or women unequal before the law, she said.
    Why bother when the law enforcers clearly promote discrimination against one sex; men?

    The framing of sexual offences in such a way as to protect the young from dangers of early sexual activity was a matter of notorious difficulty, she said.
    However, they will not protect men from the dangers our early sexual activity. Only men are being held accountable & responsible while women are given a free pass to do as they please, knowing only men will be punished... as is typical.

    The court also rejected arguments in relation to his European Convention rights to a private life, including a sexual life, and his right to a fair trial on grounds of gender. He had not sought a declaration that the law was incompatible with the State’s obligations under the convention, the Chief Justice noted.
    Just incredible.
    My blog / Your Blog
    Generic Rules
    FaceBook App

    The most offensive thing you can do to a feminist is treat her with FULL equality.
    Wife : "I dreamt they were auctioning off dicks. The big ones went for ten dollars and the thick ones went for twenty dollars."
    Husband : "How about the ones like mine?"
    Wife : "Those they gave away."
    Husband : "I had a dream too...I dreamt they were auctioning off pussy. The pretty ones went for a thousand dollars, and the little tight ones went for two thousand."
    Wife : "And how much for the ones like mine?"
    Husband : "That's where they held the auction."

  4. #3
    The Possible Human's Avatar
    The Possible Human is offline Established Member
    Member Since
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    1,755
    My Blog Entries:
    5

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    So a 15 year old boy having sex with a 14 year old girl is illegal?

    How about a 15 year old girl having sex with a 13 year old boy? A 16 year old girl having sex with a 14 year old boy? The way the law was just interpreted the boy would be guilty of a criminal sexual offense.

    This is just pure misandric madness in the Irish Supreme court. I really empathize with our young lads these days. They get fucked over by the system for doing what boys do and for merely being boys.

    I don't know how, but we have to destroy this mess the feminists have created.

    Under the Irish Supreme Courts ruling I would be convicted because when I was 16 years old and had sex with a girl who was 15 years, 10 months old. Dinosaurs and sabre toothed Tigers were still roaming the earth back then.

    According to the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Act 2006, sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 17 is a crime, but a girl who has sex while aged under 17 is not guilty of any offence.
    A whopping misandric double standard of epic magnitude.

    “Yes, of course girls are the ones that get pregnant,” she said. “But then it’s about what supports does that girl need, as opposed to criminalising one part of the relationship. And so will the father need support. But we’re trying to prevent children from having underage sex by criminalising them.”
    The law ONLY criminalizes the BOY. The girls can get away with shagging every boy within miles and not be held accountable for anything. Nothing in the girls actions would be considered "criminal" simply because she is a weak, feeble minded female who the state needs to take care of.

    The court ruling isn't only Misandric, it's extremely sexist and misogyny at it's core.

    No wonder boys feel the need to riot, smash things, and loot. The courts and laws fuck them over. The school system with it's feminist indoctrination alienates them. The politically correct vilify them.

    There truly is a WAR AGAINST BOYS taking place. So what can we do about it? We've got to get quite noisy about the situation and get some political actions started.

    If we don't speak up, the alternative is unthinkable.
    Last edited by The Possible Human; 27th-February-2012 at 07:08 AM.

  5. #4
    Marx's Avatar
    Marx is offline Administrator
    Member Since
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    20,143
    My Blog Entries:
    33

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    How many feminists will be complaining of this double standard?









    Name:  Tumbleweed.gif
Views: 206
Size:  11.7 KB
    My blog / Your Blog
    Generic Rules
    FaceBook App

    The most offensive thing you can do to a feminist is treat her with FULL equality.
    Wife : "I dreamt they were auctioning off dicks. The big ones went for ten dollars and the thick ones went for twenty dollars."
    Husband : "How about the ones like mine?"
    Wife : "Those they gave away."
    Husband : "I had a dream too...I dreamt they were auctioning off pussy. The pretty ones went for a thousand dollars, and the little tight ones went for two thousand."
    Wife : "And how much for the ones like mine?"
    Husband : "That's where they held the auction."

  6. #5
    Bigger Brother's Avatar
    Bigger Brother is online now Established Member
    Member Since
    May 2011
    Posts
    558

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    We're constantly reminded that girls mature faster than boys. There is therefore a case for making the age of criminal responsibilty LOWER for girls, not higher.

    But don't hold your breath.
    Feminism : The world's most effective contraceptive.

  7. #6
    The Possible Human's Avatar
    The Possible Human is offline Established Member
    Member Since
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    1,755
    My Blog Entries:
    5

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    Quote Quote from Marx View Post
    How many feminists will be complaining of this double standard?

    Complaining? Hell, they probably held a party after the verdict.









    Name:  Tumbleweed.gif
Views: 206
Size:  11.7 KB
    Complaining? Hell, they probably held a party after the verdict.

  8. #7
    Mateusz's Avatar
    Mateusz is offline Established Member
    Member Since
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Jiangsu
    Posts
    120

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    Quote Quote from Marx View Post
    How many feminists will be complaining of this double standard?



    Name:  Tumbleweed.gif
Views: 206
Size:  11.7 KB
    All the ones who actually do care about equality, like they claim... which is to say not a damn lot.
    Last edited by Mateusz; 27th-February-2012 at 12:52 PM.

  9. #8
    byslexic_danana's Avatar
    byslexic_danana is offline Established Member
    Member Since
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Exeter, Devon, England; 120,000 inbreds can't be wrong...
    Posts
    2,814

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    Article 40.1 recognises that applying the same treatment to all is not always desirable because it could lead to indirect inequality.....
    For some time, I've questioned as to how the feminists think that INequality can equal equality; and to counter this, they have now come up with "indirect inequality". Brilliant! "Indirect inequality; serving feminists' equality/inequality double standards since 2012!".

    Some of the differences between people, particularly in relation to capacity, are inherent and most obviously between sexes.
    Equal, where it suits; UNequal, where it suits. *Yawns*.
    "There are lies, damned lies, and there are feministic statistics". Myself
    "Behind every bitch, is a FEMINIST who made her that way....". Myself

  10. #9
    outdoors's Avatar
    outdoors is offline Silver Supporter
    Member Since
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Misandry capitol of Canada
    Posts
    7,007

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    Quote Quote from Marx View Post
    How many feminists will be complaining of this double standard?










    Name:  Tumbleweed.gif
Views: 206
Size:  11.7 KB

    The same amount that complain about any double standard when it favor's girl's.
    Your silence is important-Feminist's demand it

    mensrights-help
    http://www.mensrighthelp.com

  11. #10
    AnIrishGuy's Avatar
    AnIrishGuy is offline Silver Supporter
    Member Since
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    52
    My Blog Entries:
    1

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    An interesting point about this is case and ruling is that it relates to a 2006 law i.e. it isn't a very old law.

  12. #11
    AnIrishGuy's Avatar
    AnIrishGuy is offline Silver Supporter
    Member Since
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    52
    My Blog Entries:
    1

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    Quote Quote from Marx View Post
    How many feminists will be complaining of this double standard?
    One can listen to a representative of the Rape Crisis Network welcome the ruling at Today FM Media Player (22:00 or so). This is from an Irish national radio station.

  13. #12
    Marx's Avatar
    Marx is offline Administrator
    Member Since
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Midlands
    Posts
    20,143
    My Blog Entries:
    33

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    "Teenage girls are immune from prosecution"

    The basic logic is that because a girl can choose to get pregnant and has all the power in her hands (abortion, give birth, allow the father to have a relationship with their child or disallow the father), then only males should be prosecuted.

    This doesn't make any sense.. it's just blatant sexism as promoted by feminists.
    My blog / Your Blog
    Generic Rules
    FaceBook App

    The most offensive thing you can do to a feminist is treat her with FULL equality.
    Wife : "I dreamt they were auctioning off dicks. The big ones went for ten dollars and the thick ones went for twenty dollars."
    Husband : "How about the ones like mine?"
    Wife : "Those they gave away."
    Husband : "I had a dream too...I dreamt they were auctioning off pussy. The pretty ones went for a thousand dollars, and the little tight ones went for two thousand."
    Wife : "And how much for the ones like mine?"
    Husband : "That's where they held the auction."

  14. #13
    Nikonian's Avatar
    Nikonian is offline Established Member
    Member Since
    Sep 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    672
    My Blog Entries:
    22

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    Read this Toy Solider?

    This is absurd... I am freaked out by the whole thing.

  15. #14
    Zerbu's Avatar
    Zerbu is offline Established Member
    Member Since
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    150

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    The excuse of pregnancy cannot be considered reasonable until they stop making men and boys pay child support for children that they were tricked into, or even as a result of female-on-male rape.

  16. #15
    Xxavier's Avatar
    Xxavier is offline Established Member
    Member Since
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    222
    My Blog Entries:
    2

    Re: Boys under 17 but not girls can be convicted of underage sex - Irish Supreme Court rules law is fair!

    So a mature sophisticated 16 yr old girl can seduce a 12yr old boy for reasons of personal gratification and be immune from prosecution. In fact he is liable to prosecution and in fact she can complain to the police.

    So in short, in Ireland girls can have sex at any age, boys cannot. Wow.
    Last edited by Xxavier; 27th-February-2012 at 10:01 PM.


 

You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?

  1. U.S. Supreme Court Rules Fathers are Inferior
    By zetamale in forum Feminist/ Misandry
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22nd-June-2011, 01:50 AM
  2. Brazilian Supreme Court rules in favor of David Goldman in custody case
    By Zuberi in forum Marriage/Divorce, Children, Choice for Men
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23rd-December-2009, 10:37 AM
  3. The Boys Project: An examination of how boys & young men fair in feminized education
    By TheSharpenedPen in forum Discrimination & Sexist Double Standards
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 28th-October-2007, 05:56 PM
  4. Court rules boy can't compete on girls' squad
    By Tyrael in forum Discrimination & Sexist Double Standards
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 3rd-December-2006, 11:43 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
1e2 Forum

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO