Adulterous Wives MUST Get FULL Alimony / Maintenance

**Stan** · 15th-December-2008

This is in India. Right now cheating wives who want to divorce to further their relationship with their new hot lover cannot get alimony / maintenance. But the Feminists want to increase alimony AND make it available in full to the cheaters.

This is presently how it works in the USA. Cheat on your husband and win his cash if the new guy is better. No penalty, sanction, or ill will. This means that in effect we encourage women to look for the bigger better deal if they get bored.

I sure hope that there are men's groups that can counter this effort. If the Feminists prevail then marriage will be greatly harmed in India and more countries will follow the precedents.

Wives accused of adultery must get alimony

Wives accused of adultery must get alimony

The National Commission for Women has asked the government not to amend section 497 (Anti-Adultery Act) and treat women as ‘victims’ of adultery, thereby paving the way for payment of alimony to adulterous wives. .

CALL IT “unbelievable” if you wish. But, the National Commission for Women has decided to contest in the Supreme Court of India, section 125 of CRPC. Amongst the provisions that the Commission wants a review is an increase in the amount of interim maintenance for women by not less than 30 per cent of the husband’s monthly income. The Commission also wants the provision that deprives a wife from claiming maintenance if she is living in adultery to be deleted. “This provision is mostly misused and adultery cases framed against a woman to deny her basic expenses,” NCW chairperson Girija Vyas said. It has also decided against making Alimony Act gender neutral since, according to the NCW, a majority of households still have men as breadwinners.

Outrageous, insulting and unjust, one may say, but the NCW is doing every bit it can do and is trying every trick in the rule book to ensure that adulterous women get away with their crime and their unfortunate husbands are made to pay maintenance to them. In another recommendation, it has asked the government not to amend section 497 (adultery) and treat women as ‘victims’ of adultery. Under IPC 497, men alone can be prosecuted; women cannot be punished for adultery.

Some people may argue in favour of the NCW plea with regard to misuse of the said provision relating to denial of alimony quoting adultery. It is like saying, “I have a cold and as a solution, I will chop-off my nose.”

It is high time civil society wakes up to this growing tendency of the NCW going overboard in the guise of women empowerment. Men in particular, need to be organised in order to fight and defend their rights.

**TheOldOligarch** · 15th-December-2008

Lol, priceless, this is my favourite part

Quote from Stan

It has also decided against making Alimony Act gender neutral since, according to the NCW, a majority of households still have men as breadwinners.

Well a majority of men do not commit rape, so how about the law ignores those that do, sound fair?

**Stan** · 15th-December-2008

reI wonder what the marriage and divorce rates and trends are in India. And what young men think of marriage.

All over the world there is a huge Feminist push. More rights, less accountability.

Why marry?

Is the secret goal to eliminate traditional families and just make life about the instant gratification of individuals?

**Stan** · 15th-December-2008

delete thread

**Zuberi** · 15th-December-2008

Paying a woman for being a whore?
It's only a matter of time before rapture comes.

**Marx** · 15th-December-2008

Quote from Stan

delete thread

Alternatively, just post news articles in the 'news' category... like everyone manages to.

**Stan** · 15th-December-2008

Quote from Marx

Alternatively, just post news articles in the 'news' category... like everyone manages to.

Delete the thread please. Thanks.

**Marx** · 15th-December-2008

Quote from Stan

Delete the thread please. Thanks.

No I'll pass - instead, I'll *yet again* move it to the proper place on your behalf seeing as you can't be blessed to post it in the right place first time around. I'm sure you get a kick out of acting like a prick.

**Marx** · 15th-December-2008

Additionally, the deleting of content just to spite - is precisely why editing was initially disabled for standard members. Well done to Stan for confirming that some folk should not be trusted with a shred of power, give 'em a mile...

**MikeT** · 16th-December-2008

Quote from Stan

Delete the thread please. Thanks.

Stan is obviously not the man he is making himself out to be.

Stan is more than likely a woman and a troll at that.

I will say however, that these National Councils of Women, the world over, are a single issue group under any name.
All they want to do is beat men down at the expense of men.
It is rather strange how they also get good Government funding to do this, no matter what country they come from.

Now, for a group like this to come out and say we want to screw around and have our ex-partners to pay for the privilege just isn't right.

If a man has an affair with some woman, the last thing he is going to get is a payment of any kind from his wife, exactly the opposite.
This is how one-sided this BS is.

My advice, stay as far the hell away from marriage as what you can get, it has become a money tree for those women that have no intention of supporting themselves, so why let them get a foot in the door in the first place?

**shaazam** · 16th-December-2008

Quote from Stan

reI wonder what the marriage and divorce rates and trends are in India. And what young men think of marriage.

All over the world there is a huge Feminist push. More rights, less accountability.

Why marry?

Is the secret goal to eliminate traditional families and just make life about the instant gratification of individuals?

better reads

All over the world there is a huge Feminist push. More rights, no accountability.

feminits truly believe - " life is short go for the max "