A Road Map for the Future

Everybody should have a crystal ball. It is good to look into the future, don't you think?

Today, if it won't impose upon you too much, I would like to gaze into my own crystal ball, and describe what I see there - or at any rate, what I think I see there. You never know, it might turn out to be something useful. And don't forget that "prediction" an important part of counter-feminism. So let's get busy with some predictions, shall we?

In the treatise that follows, I would like to cover some rather new ground. And although I will be discussing the future, I am also talking about many things that are current in the world right this very minute, so that quite a few of these "predictions" are in fact nothing of the sort. They are already old and familiar. However, we all know that the present is the seed-bed of the future - what is presently "so" may in time become "more so". Bearing this is mind, and bearing in mind likewise certain algorithms of historical occurence which play and re-play perennially in every drama that involves the human animal, we may venture in all confidence to compose our canvas in broad strokes that won't go far amiss.

I have elsewhere spoken of feminism as a perpetual revolution, and have made it clear that the end of perpetual revolution would entail the end of feminism as well. Moreover, I have implied, without fully addressing the subject, that perpetual revolution carries the seeds of its own demise. However, although I still believe this is the case, I am able to envision certain conditions under which the dynamic of perpetual revolution, hence feminism as a whole, may be artificially fueled and extended - and longer, perhaps, than people like us might wish to endure! Let us not underestimate the evil intelligence of our enemy - which in many ways resembles that of a highly adaptable virus. Let us rather anticipate that they might have covered the bases more thoroughly than we wish to think, and prepare for the possibility that they have done so in fact.

The extension of perpetual revolution would occur, as I project, in the context of a three-tiered social power hierarchy. This three-tiered hierarchy would consist, from top down, of 1.) A primary ruling class called the (Male)Elite, 2.) A secondary ruling class called the Overclass, and 3.) A more-or-less immobilized proletariat at the bottom of the heap, simply called the Underclass.

The Male Elite makes a tiny percentage of the total population, the Overclass a significantly large minority, while the Underclass is distinctly the largest human reservoir of the three. In the midst of the three-tiered system, feminism plays a complex, catalytic role which our talk will enlarge upon.

The transitional zones between these power layers will appear fuzzy when viewed at close quarters, but distinctly sharper when contemplated from a distance. While there is a limited degree of permeability - or "upward mobility" to use a classic term - it is significant for our purposes is that mobility between zones is growing markedly more difficult. Something almost like a caste system appears to be under development.

The Elite

It should first be known that the purpose of this entire system is to secure the overlordship of the male Elite.

For if in truth there be any such thing as that "patriarchy " which feminist theory postulates, the male Elite could well indeed merit the title. Thus considered, the irony is quickly apparent in the feminist application of this word to thoughtlessly tar multitudes of men whose veritable power amounts to very little.

The most important thing to understand about the male Elite - or more simply the Elite, since many of them have wives and daughters after all! - is that they do not think or view the world in anything like the same terms as most of the human race. This is particularly striking in the case of political or ideological categories.

Labels such as Democrat, Republican, liberal, conservative, left, right, Marxist, fascist, socialist and so on, barely exist at all for members of the Elite. They view the world from a different optic entirely - wired to different emotive triggers and bound by loyalties we needn't hope to unriddle. Consequently, the Elite are able to play all sides of all fences, with equal pragmatic indifference, in the variable service of their instrumental needs. This in practice makes them inscrutable puppet-masters and, from our point of view, even solipsistic: they are distinctly not us, therefore we cannot read them as ourselves. Such aloofness, such catlike alterity, comes naturally to them and is really no mystery at all: it is the consequence of being SO powerful that you can afford to live in your own world and remain oblivious to more generally held sources of meaning.

Simply stated, the Elite are the high alpha males of the world. The tip-top layer of the pyramid. Through their vast and densely networked lockdown on banking and politics, they control the foundational conditions which determine how our lives will go. Lesser powers cascade from their greater power. Yes, they are a boy's club.

And they are getting better and better at their game!

I'll not spend much time talking about the Elite; they are in many ways the least interesting portion of my subject, given how they are so remote from the sphere of action that we know. Suffice to say that they are an intricate world unto themselves, by no means monolithic, and that all of this makes them proportionately more difficult to fathom from beneath.

The Overclass

The next level down, in the three-tiered system, is what we have termed the Overclass. In point of numbers this class far outweighs the Elite. In marked contrast to the ELite - who would rather keep a shadowy, elusive profile - the Overclass constitutes the everyday face of the ruling power structure.

The Overclass may be understood as the delegated contractual workforce of the elite, responsible for administrative tasks and various domains involving intellectual creativity. Globally considered, they are the upper managers and consultants.

In cultural terms, the Overclass has certain distinguishing features which mark them off from the Underclass. Most apparent to the eye, is that they are well-financed and well-heeled. They have, moreover, an unmistakeable air of ease and security about them. Their lives are not worm-eaten by debt to any great degree, and being well-connected and well networked, they have a host of fallback options when things go awry. On the whole, their lives operate smoothly - they are sheltered from the vicissitudes. They have greater access to the means of self-realization in many forms, along with better food, better health care, more aesthetically pleasing physical environments, and a lower degree of stress all around. Finally, they have the
means to obtain postsecondary education; consequently, they are more likely to have done so - which makes them "better educated", at least along the lines that are apt to secure political advantage in various forms.

An interesting recent development is the rise of the so-called "bobo", or bourgeois bohemian, class. This has been a result of cultural tectonic shiftings in the earthquake decade of the 1960s. The bobos, being a vital element of the Overclass, are certainly a powerful sector in the presently emerging world order. This phenomenon would make an interesting study all unto itself.

However, as counter-feminist agents of change, what chiefly holds our interest is the relationship between the Overclass on the one side, and feminism both ideologically and politically, on the other.

The Overclass is heavily indoctrinated with the feminist world-view. This has been the case for some time now - it is so, and becoming more so. Infiltration of feminist ideations into the world of postsecondary education (and all education for that matter) has been one of the main vectors operating to convey this line of influence into the targeted region. Another, running in tandem with the first, is the steady, plodding encroachment of women into vocational areas which are either well-paid, politically influential, physically undemanding, or all three. This process is still underway; it is by no means complete or even nearing completion.

Along with the influx of politically naive women into the sectors mentioned, it is rational to anticipate the arrival of ideological feminists in certain numbers - or even feminist cadres. Thus, an ongoing replication of the feminist political machine by both formal and informal methods, gravitating always toward a theoretical point of saturation. The objective balance of probability in no way excludes such development - it is no less rational to anticipate such development, than to anticipate the contrary.

What is happening in the workforce is happening simultaneously, if in varied fashion, in other domains - many of which make their impact across the board, in both the Overclass and the Underclass. The propagation of the feminist worldview, along with the rapid extension of the femplex, is not easily contained within a particular demographic - nor would any such containment comport with feminist purposes. However, what IS easily contained, or at least regulated, is the mobility of male population from the Underclass into the Overclass.

Consider once again the infiltration of women (and consequently feminist women) into the generally desireable sectors of the working world. The upshot of this is to convert large and growing regions of the vocational landscape into effectively female-dominated, if not feminist-dominated, territory.

Next, consider the widespead propagation of anti-male bias in the realm of law, jurisprudence, criminal justice procedure, policies, regulations, and codes of various kinds. Such things have happened, and will continue happening. Such things have crept in the night, and will continue creeping in the night. Feminism's perpetual revolution does not stop until somebody or something sabotages the track and derails it.

So, in large areas of life, males have undergone something very like the totalitarian method in which selected classes of people are listed as "objective enemies". Under feminism, men are objective enemies. Such is the psychic miasma that creeps slowly, slowly, invisibly, and never sleeps. If the miasma has not yet crept into every possible corner everywhere, this is not owing to any lack of ambition to eventually do so.

Such is the present condition of the Overclass. It is not feasible to exclude males entirely from the Overclass. However, it is certainly possible to exclude males within subtle categories. The growing presence of the feminist political machine, along with a proliferation of naive acquiesence from the femplex, makes possible a system of cultural filters that can exclude a male person unable to walk an agonizingly fine line in his personal manifestations. The filters grow steadily more discerning, able to capture finer and finer nuances of personal style by turning the personal into the political in ways more and more microscopic, and setting a hostile assessment on whatever does not implicitly endorse the feminist world-view.

If you intend to prosper as a male in the Overclass, it helps immensely to have made a full psychic capitulation to the feminist world-view. In Orwellian terms, you will find favor if you have won the victory over yourself and "learned to love Big Mother." If you have not so capitulated, or if you are not superhumanly clever at masking your true feelings, then the filters will catch you. If not today, then certainly in 10, 20 or 30 years, when detection algorithms have grown more sophisticated.

So, it is easy to see that large blocs of the male population can, for various reasons, be excluded from feminist or female-dominated ways of making a living. When you realize that these vocational sectors largely define Overclass membership at the level of economic prosperity, you will see that feminist or female domination of such sectors will operate as a gatekeeping mechanism, governing who in terms of male demographic sectors does or does not infiltrate the Overclass.

In the end, the feminist world-view shall effectively colonize the Overclass. Non-participation in this paradigm would, to males in particular, spell non-participation in the Overclass for all but a few hardy mavericks. The Overclass will consist of "empowered" women, and "feminized" men. The real power will, in the final analysis, lie in the hands of women.

But the final power at the very highest level will continue to repose in the hands of the "patriarchal" male-dominated Elite, who will use women as tools to control the bulk of the male population with an effectiveness unprecedented in all of known human history.
-------------

NEXT: The role of the Underclass in the three-tiered hierarchy of domination, and a description of the Feminist Column.

(TO BE CONTINUED.....)

More...

The elite will not always be male-dominated. I do not believe this for a moment.

When a male elite dies, power can shift to the female members of the structure. Women have means of gaining power which are subtle, slow and discreet. If the power base of the overclass is completely feminized, it is inevitable that these changes will begin to filter up to the top. In the end, for all intents and purposes, even the shadow elite will be matriarchal, though this matters very little to those of us stuck at the bottom.

Too true men on the bottom rung will not get ahead or be heard as individuals. But as a whole we can be extremely powerful. That's why the elite fear us.

"The elite will not always be male-dominated. I do not believe this for a moment."

Well, you COULD be right. Obviously, time will tell.

But, suppose that the Elite becomes female-dominated. That would mean that every major controlling power base on earth would be female (or feminist) dominated.

At that point, we might logically expect to see an EXTREME polarization of the male-female political spectrum.

In other words, a growth of male political consciousness....

AND....a vital, charismatic male power base would start to form within the world of the Underclass.

AND....it could be expected to GROW....

After all, it would be situated in the socio-political region most favorable to such growth.

Increasingly disaffected males from all classes would look toward the Underclass for...."leadership".

Women, too, would gravitate thataways, since vital charismatic male energy in whatever form it occurs is a mighty magnet for females. It is a dark, primitive instinctual thing....

The power distribution could go bottom-heavy, and capsize, and turn the whole mess bottom up.

We need to think of these things in advance, just like a chess player thinks of all possible moves in advance....

Quoting myself: "The power distribution could go bottom-heavy, and capsize, and turn the whole mess bottom up."

I'm sorry, I was thinking and writing too fast for my own good, and I didn't word that very well. Obviously, things don't go bottom up when they are bottom-HEAVY....

But, hopefully, you all know what I'm saying here. The concept is, that growth of power at the bottom means that the bottom will not remain the bottom.

But that inspires another thought. Power "rises" because it has a light, upward-tending nature. Similar to heated air, low-pressure air, or flame...

Which leads me to think that in order to be powerful, we need to understand "lightness".

You certainly sound "illuminated" to me.

Similare view to my own being expressed here..

Men have the ultimate power of ultimate control, they are the heavy duty law enforcers, the soldiers, the police, they are those who take up the states monoploy of violence and inflict it upon the individuals..

Women can make up all manner of laws, feminists are good at doing this, but without men to actually apply the force needed, they are helpless..

As long as the HDLE are men acting like mindless servants to the "overclass" of feminists, women and feminised men, we have stabilty, the elite, as ever, will be happy in their isolated worlds..

The HDLE exist where though??

In the overclass or underclass?

Many of the HDLE are very, nah, EXTREMELY aggreived at certain aspects of their lives..

High risk, dangerous work..

Pay may be high, but true power is being more and more eroded by the overclass femimists..

The overclass feminists are in my view increasingly rubbishing the HDLE.. They are insulting and abusing these men.. Many soldiers are at very high risk of being criminalised by rape allegations, many police officers are sufferring dreadfully from the divorce laws etc.. and trumped up "brutality" charges etc..

The HDLE are looking more and more like the overclass would much rather replace them with more females and feminised..

I see this as inevitable, the greed of the feminists to include all, except none and make more gains will mean that they will eventually drive the HDLE to exist in the underclass, with the rest of the servant males.. although the overclass will create a privelegded sector of bulldyke females and feminised within this group, promote them ahead, etc..

When society has come to a certain critical point, and the HDLE become more and more aggrieved at their roles being reduced in respect and value and more and more dangerous, I believe society will flip very suddenly..

It will take maybe just one charismatic leader to persuade the armed forces and police agents to realise the immense power that they have to operate with impunity from the femised overclass..

The elite, of course, will hardly be affected by all this.. It may even be the case that they order it and engineer it directly.. completely cutting out the usual overclass links.. it will simply mean that feminism will eventually warp into a form of neo-fascism as a natural consequence of the slavish devotion to power holding individuals that the feminists induce..

The law is helpless when the enforcers with the big guns refuse to listen to those who create the rules..

The gulf war will be bringing home many men, damaged men, who will come home to pain and divorce..

Cant see them all taking the pills prescribed by the feminist doctors who tell them they must declare Post Traumatic stress disorder and take it easy and take the meds..

Nah.. Dont take the medication boys..

Psychosis is very healthy indeed as a means of completely altering the perspectives of others with practically immediate effect..

Feminists are easily persuaded to drop their knickers and take a big load where it counts.. They dont really want to rule the world, its much too hard for them when they get there!!

Things may seem grim now, but inevitably, feminism is doomed.. The wonder drug for the western economy is now not fixing the problems and the patient is sufferring more and more long term sideeffects that just wont go away..

Radical excision is due within the next decade or so I suspect..

Welllll.....

If the Elite are once again pulling the strings in that kind of a future scenario, it means they are helping to dismantle their most *brilliant* idea ever...

Namely, the idea of recruiting one half of the population (women) as their useful idiot/tools in keeping the other half (men) powerless and pinned to the mat.

Which has effectively been put into operation - and continues to be extended.

I should think they'd be loath to give up such a sweet deal (from their point of view).

Still, I wouldn't put it beyond them, since it is nearly impossible to second-guess them.

Also, let's not assume that they are entirely rational.... :-0

That brilliant idea was always known to be a temporary one.. a couple of generations at most before it backfired and needed to be replaced, and it was always known that we would have to basically get back to something like the previous order, we just wanted a fast kick forward, but the engine is starting to misfire and is now getting well fucked..

Being one of the elite myself, I see that society has moved forward and made great strides thanks to the plan to put women into the workplace to hopefully double our economic output and secure our comfortable lives..

However, seems that it is no longer working at all well, women are still moaning like fuck, they are whining about having on average one child less than they want, and about having to support useless men and not being able to find suitable marraige partners.. Or get sperm donation and fertility treatment..

They are no longer happy with the careers we gave them, and it seems that after 50 years of being increasingly productive, they are now become less productive and starting to drain society with the shit jobs they are doing as mothers leaving us with a generation of practically unemployable men and women who want a fucking gold plated job and time off for PMT every week..

The other half, the men, are getting fed up too and are demotivated, not working hard enough, they now longer feel the need to chase that dream and are expecting women and the state to give it to them..

Double economic output was never actually achieved, its all settled down now and the hedonic kickback is coming home to roost..

This was to be predicted and I planned an method and outcome to deal with this 25 years ago while locked up (voluntarily of course) in a state lunatic assylum..

Feminism is on its death bed now, sadly for the mangina's you lot will never have your day, not this century!!

I am afraid we will have to keep them feminists running the place and running you all around till you realise you dont actually HAVE to run round..

Give it another decade or so, and the men who need to turn it, they will turn it..

We sit happy, either way.. Mass immigration will flatten the feminist idealogy, or the men who can do will do what they can within the cuntry..

But, its a definite that women will not keep working hard for much longer, and the men are slacking too much now in the false hope that they will!

I have yet to make a prediction that has not actually come true with even greater validity than I expected!!

Return to patriarchy?

Pretty much as good as! But not quite the same.. There were a few good things we think you folk liked about feminism, but they seem pretty redundant now that sex has been linked to diseases with more frequency than pleasure..

Plus, the paradise engineers are busy trying to genetically modify humanity in order to remove the need for those drug pushers we let run society..

The feminist system works on the idea that men want sex with women, not each other or their right hands, and they need to beat the female income to get sex..

Its failing because women are getting too desperate now, and men are more interested in shagging each other, and dont want to take the bait..

Never mind.. Life goes on!

Id better eat my porridge now and get back to sleep..