This is a discussion on Write your own Rant within the Competitions forums, part of the General category; Then let us contact WH Smith's and enquire as to why they're not stocking it? We could point out that ...
| |||||||
| ►Link to us◄ | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#31
| |||||
| |||||
|
Then let us contact WH Smith's and enquire as to why they're not stocking it? We could point out that men do make up 1/2 the worlds population, thereby, they are denying a lot of people a choice in reading materials. They are also marginalizing their profit potential, due to their selective decisions.
| |||||
|
#32
| ||||
| ||||
I read this on another forum. Nothing new in it, but pretty good summary. http://polanimal.it.net.au/viewtopic.php?t=2136 Quote:
| ||||
|
#33
| ||||||
| ||||||
Fantastic, that really was a good rant... I thoroughly enjoyed reading that.
| ||||||
|
#34
| |||
| |||
What comes around goes around as the phrase goes. In the 70s militant feminists proclaimed they were angry and wanted revenge against the fictional patriarchy. As a man child of the 70s I am angry! Angry because of the lies that I have had to endure all my life and while at the same time watch the slow moral decline of society. Well this is my rant and me making my stand against it. Im a thirty something man who had been brainwashed into believing the feminist propaganda: as a man Im a member of the oppressive patriarch and women were oppressed through out history by men; that as a man I am a potential rapist; that men are violent; that men are responsible for all wars etc. etc. And as for why should I believe such rubbish? Simple, because that is what I was taught and society helped reinforce this message backed up by bogus statistics like 1 in 4 women are the victims of rape. A couple of years ago I read a story in the local newspaper published by Glasgow University claiming that infamous statistic 1 in 4 women are the victims of rape that really got me thinking. The emotional content of the story centred on this girl who been in a relationship with a boyfriend. One night they came home after being out drinking and she had sex with her boyfriend after reluctantly being pressured into it by him. Later they broke up and now somehow her entire life has been destroyed because of this one incident. The story went on to say that she doesnt go out now, she hates all men, will never trust them, she would wail and ball tearing her hair out. In reading this I just thought What?. You can embellish a lie so much before it becomes so obvious that even a blind man can see the lie for what it is. In digging about I came across various websites but in particular Angry Harrys website (Good one mate ;-) and so began the road to higher and truthful enlightenment. Now I see that somehow for why the girl wails and balls tearing her hair out, in the forementioned story, as being the femi-nazis at Glasgow Uni getting their hands on her and brainwashing her into believing she was actually raped. It was a particular incident at medical school in the early 90s that made me believe this statistic without question for so long. Before going to university I had gone to a mostly boys boarding school (1 girl for every 6 boys) and I was the geek in the class. So my exposure to girls during this critical time in life was all stick and no carrot. But in first year uni I went to this party where other boys from my year at school were at and a couple of girls who were still at school had come down for the party. Well they got drunk and had past out and the other boys were egging me on to strip her naked and do her while she was passed out. I just turned round to them and flatly said No and walked out of the party and to this day have never seen or spoken to them again. To practice medicine you have to learn the scientific facts about how the human body really works or else it is no better than so called alternative medicine which is nothing better than pseudo-science. The only course in medicine that I really disagreed with was Medical Sociology. It is pseudo-science because it is not based on experimental evidence but instead on political ideology. The number of women that Ive met over the years with so called Social Science degrees who describe themselves as scientists is an utter disgrace to the very name of science. In the early 90s I was introduced by friends of mine studying computer science to this little thing in their lab called the Internet. Theyre times in human history that when a new technology comes along you realise that human society will never be the same again. As the last decade has shown this is such a technology and I was there at its birth. I had also found my calling in life so after 3 years of medicine it got packed in and I went into software engineering. My dad was furious saying So you want to be Bill Gates? and I asked Whos Bill Gates?. Odd how the inventor of the first personal PC retired after making his fortune and became a doctor. The early 90s was also the age of the new man a man who does the house work, cleaning, cooking, hovering and ironing. The upshot being that Ive never needed a women to look after me because I am far more than capable of looking after myself. It is not arrogant of me to say that Ive worked with some of the best and brightest in my time and still do. A universal world communication network that provides for all your needs is no easy thing you know. But another thing I can say about the computer industry is that its a women free zone. Now the feminist propaganda will have us all believe that we are misogynist pigs and dont employ women because its all jobs for the boys. Nothing could possibly be further from the truth. A good programmer is someone who is single bloody minded. It requires you to build a mental picture in your mind of the most abstract concepts and write them down in logical notation and hook them all up. A consequence of this is that developers dont talk very much and trying to describe what youve created is next to impossible. Thingie and stuff are a very popular words in the world of hi-tech. Also playing about with lego and other constructive toys as a kid was a big plus. Also how could a newly industry whose ethos is based on liberal free-thinking be misogynist? Apples slogan Think differently, Googles slogan Do no evil, Linux Its free. Women in general are much more social and better at multi tasking than men are. Whereas men, from my point of view, are better at doing a single dedicated task to the anti-social exclusion of everything else which is what is needed to program a computer. The number of pointless trivia about computers is much more suited to men, just as football scores are. There is gender inbalance in the industry. A study was done where 2 identical CVs were drawn up listing the same IT skill set the only difference was one was male the other female. The female applicant got 4 times the number of job interviews than did the man. Why? Because there is such a drought of female talent within one the worlds most important industries. And these pig headed feminists have the nerve to spread their misandrist lies by calling me a misogynist pig!!!! Oh my blood boils with rage at these lies. And how is someone like me who is both a scientist and engineer described in the media or popular culture? In a word Nerd. Any reference to someone like me is described as a nerd. Dictionary definition being slang meaning stupid, irritating, ineffectual, unattractive person. It is so deeply ingrained into our society now that when out chat up girls and it comes to So what do you do for a living? I no longer say Im a software engineer I rather say unemployed as at least that way I may still be in with a chance with them. Seriously in my experience women rather go out with me if I describe myself as being unemployed because I can be fixed than go out with me because I am very successful in the hitech industry and as such would be a social embarsement. Political correctness is the terminal cancer of society. In a democracy there are political parties are they debate the issues of the day based on the founding ideology on which that party was founded and vote to pass new laws by which society lives by. Historically Labour for the left and Conservative for the right. Liberalism was based on the ideology that all humans should be free thinking and free to make up their own minds, which if you think about it doesnt really stand for anything but everything. New Labour lies, spin and corruption. So politics is based on differing point of views whereby the most populist view point is that which is passed into law. That is the democratic way. But what political correctness says and does is to impose a ban on certain points of view or arguments that might be relevant to a particular debate. That is to ban our leaders from freedom of speech in the most important debates in our society those upon which our laws are based. And what is correct? 2+2=4 can said to be correct and 2+2=5 is not correct. But to say something that a particular minority might feel uncomfortable with particularly in the face of evidence and empirical data is considered wrong? I might as well say that 2+2=5 and is such because it is FACT and it is fact because I wrote FACT in capital letters. Political correctness stops the real issues being debated fully with all points of view expressed. Words like homophobe, racist, bigot and our all time favourite here misogynist pig are all the rage when something considered politically incorrect is said. Yet politics is about debate and discussion of issues to find the best way forward for us as a society and to reduce the debate to name calling is childish. But this is what we as an evolved and enlightened society have come to expect from our so called leaders. They refuse to debate the important issues openly and freely because certain subjects like feminism, single mothers, immigration, muslim extremism, membership of the EU or Euro in full and open manner. Never mind allowing the plebs the vote on if we want to join the Euro or not. In fact career politians hardly debate but rather pander to the media because they are involved in what is little more than a popularity contest because their lively hood depends on it. Hence making our democracy little more than a popularity contest. And so when half the vote is the womens vote anything that is considered to go against the feminist doctrine is taboo. So the misandrist militant feminists can get their way and enforce their perverted lie passed into law. And our childish leaders go along with it. Not so much shame on them, but the gallows for them!!!! | |||
![]() |
| Tags |
| rant, write |
| Thread Tools | |
| | |||||||
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A rant! | lolintertubes | Chit chat (MAIN) | 13 | 3rd-January-2008 10:36 AM |
| About books MRM write | julie | Chit chat (MAIN) | 4 | 20th-December-2007 07:47 PM |
| Britney's Mum To Write Parenting Manual | MikeT | Stupidity | 13 | 2nd-November-2007 04:05 AM |
| Why is it ok to write books about hurting men? | sir_iw | Misandry.us | 1 | 7th-August-2007 11:54 AM |
| Just a rant... | Ted Bundy | Chit chat (MAIN) | 86 | 19th-July-2007 03:14 AM |
| |