Women are arming themselves with 50,000 volt tasers to use on men with impunity.

**Kargan303** · 15th-November-2007

--- In No_Feminazis@ yahoogroups. com, "realism_only"
<realism_only@ ...> wrote:

Marc Rudov wrote and article on this. Here it is..

--------

Marc H. Rudov
Don't Tase Me, Babe!
November 13, 2007 at 1:00 pm · Filed under Vox Populi

Presumptive Predators
In case you didn't know, October was "Domestic Violence Awareness
Month," during which Americans were startled to learn that women are
just as likely as men to commit domestic violence. Mention this at a
party, and you'll find yourself standing alone at the punchbowl for
the rest of the night: people just don't want to hear it. Sugar and
spice, remember?

Because of VAWA (Violence Against Women Act), American men are
presumptively and, therefore, unconstitutionally tagged as predators.
Men must face a feminist justice system of proving innocence, instead
of being protected by the US Constitution, which requires prosecutors
to prove guilt. They have Senator Joseph Biden (D-DE) to thank for
this -- just ask the three exonerated lacrosse players from Duke
University. And, what happened to Crystal Gail Mangum, the woman who
was protected by an unconstitutional rape-shield law after she
falsely accused them of rape? The same thing that happens to all
fraudulent rape accusers: nothing. What do the feminist presidential
candidates (Hillary and the men) have to say about this: nothing. How
many of you men in Delaware will reelect Joe Biden?

The misandrist climate doesn't end there. Because of IMBRA, the
unconstitutional law that Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) sponsored,
American men are considered dangerous to foreign women. That's right,
foreign women in foreign countries now have more American rights than
American men living in America. Because of IMBRA, foreign women now
have the power to demand unilateral background checks on American men
before dating them. Worse, they can do whatever they want with this
confidential information. How many of you men in Kansas will reelect
Sam Brownback?

The Shocking Truth

Enter the "Taser for ladies," available in metallic pink for $350
from Taser International, Inc., in Scottsdale, AZ. A news item on Fox
News described the latest fad: women having Taser parties, redolent
of Tupperware parties, where they get each other to purchase these
weapons. Do women sometimes find themselves in dangerous situations
where they need protection? Absolutely. Because of VAWA, do women
have the potential to fraudulently use Tasers, with impunity -- in
arguments, in rages, out of jealousy, for spite, in revenge, etc. --
to commit legal assault and battery on innocent men? You bet they do!

A Taser purchaser must register with and get approval from the
company. What about training, though? If she uses it, where on a
man's body will she aim it? Is she liable for any harm to him? Is she
obligated to get him medical attention? According to the company
Website: TASER® energy weapons are not considered firearms — they're
legal to carry in most states without permits (including California).
They are restricted from citizen use in MA, RI, NY, NJ, WI, MI, HI,
IL, and certain cities and counties. According to a German consultant
to the company, Tasers, as consumer products, are currently illegal
in Europe.

If Taser weapons are not considered firearms, what are they
considered? This presents yet another challenge to our hypocritical,
gynocratic "legal" system. I don't know what Tasers are considered,
but I can guess: in the name of protecting women -- translation:
getting the female vote -- our male legislators and judges will
ignore the issue until men force them to deal with it. This is the
shocking truth, folks.

Here's a scenario to ponder: If a maniacal wife attacks her husband,
as so often happens, and he tases her, what do you suppose would
happen to him? Ha! How many lawyers would it take to defend him,
to "prove his innocence"? Not to mention being pilloried by the media
as a wimp (when a woman attacks a man, it is just emotion; let it
go).

The NoNonsense Bottom Line

I counsel every man to ask a new paramour, before becoming sexually
involved with her, about: her use of birth control, her willingness
to terminate an accidental pregnancy, and her carriage of STDs. Now,
there is a new question to add: Do you own a Taser? If she does, and
logic and perspective don't appear to be her strongsuits, stay far,
far away from her.

Remember Biden & Brownback: they have convinced their Senate and
House colleagues to give women the preponderance of civil and
criminal rights. They are responsible for creating the Department of
Justice's unconstitutional Office on Violence Against Women. And,
they will be responsible for women indiscriminately tasing men.

There are many things you might want to say during a romantic evening
gone badly, but the last one is: "Don't tase me, babe!"

-----

The very women that men run around pandering to and asking for their
phone numbers are arming themselves to harm -- and possibly kill --
men with 50,000 volt tasers. This is war gentlemen and any man that
makes excuses for women is part of the enemy, thus NOT a brother of
ours.

**paul parmenter** · 15th-November-2007

I remember a few years back a crazy woman being interviewed on a British TV chat show because she had come up with a proposal that all women should be allowed, by law, to carry guns in their handbags for "self defence", and use them in any situation in which they thought they were being threatened. She made it quite clear, of course, that she envisaged these guns being used exclusively on men, and the woman's judgement on whether she felt threatened and therefore believed she was justified in pulling out her gun and blazing away, was not to be questioned.

What was particularly revolting is that the interviewers, a man and a woman as I remember, and another female guest on the show, treated her with all seriousness, and let her spout this dangerous hate-filled garbage virtually without challenge.

None of them had the sense to ask her some pertinent questions like why should anyone be allowed to gun down another person without question and without trial; or why should women be given the power of life and death over men for no better reason than that they were the ones with vaginas; or whether she proposed that all women should have guns, including schoolgirls, the neurotic, and the clinically insane (like her).

Neither did any of them have the guts to tell her to her face that she was just a misandric turd who should be behind bars in a mental institute. Still, perhaps they were just taking their cue from the TV station that was stupid enough to give the freak a big dollop of air time in the first place.

The point is that there have always been women who just itch to find a way to overcome men's physical power, and are seduced by the idea of being given a free hand to deploy weapons against them. And so much the better if they can create a climate where we will all be softened up enough to let them get away with it. Every so often, they crawl out of the woodwork and test the water to see if our society is ready to take that step. They will keep trying, and in our current misandric culture they are not that far off their objective.