Fuck me, sounds pretty much like that world we're living in today anyway. I bet this going to be a big hit for the overfed daytime TV watching crowd.

hey guys, dont dismiss this programme just yet, Ive got a funny feeling the women will (yet again) expose themselves for who they really are on national television.

its interesting that theres going to be a 'queen'.

whenever women are in situations of power like this as a group, they back-bite each other and the group falls apart. we've seen it on the apprentice and big brother. (not that I admit to watching that shit), other shows.

fuck the few men in the show, they are the sacrifical lambs as far as Im concerned. lets see how the women (ab)use their power.

maybe its not a bad thing for females to keep pushing their luck in this way, that could be their downfall.

the more they push their luck, the more excited and stressed they get when reality hits them. women cannot deal with stress long-term.

let them go on believing they are the stronger sex, all the while more and more men continue to talk to each other about how they operate.

just some thoughts.

My nephew buys Zoo or Nuts, not sure which. Anyway, I was flicking through it one day and they had a quick TV guide mentioning this gynocentric series. They only laughed at it for being so out-dated.

"""This new reality series attempts to exactly that, putting eight feisty females in charge of ten macho males, and challenging them to create their own utopia on a beautiful Caribbean island.""""

yes utopia from the feminit aspect dystopia for the men

I can see the "eight feisty females in charge" as drawing a few of the biggest of the "ten macho males," into the dark side of the force to keep the other macho's in line and serving the 8 " feisty" ones to a tee

politically correct interpretations:

feisty - loud mouthed to arrogant feminits used to being pandered to by macho men

macho - feminit approved men as possessing suitable submissive characteristics so as to be useful to the feminits ( those that aren't approved are referred to as chauvinist pigs)

chauvinist pigs - men that are more interested in using their precious time in promoting their own agenda than going on silly charades to a Carribbean islands with eight feisty wimin

I would like too see a mutiny where the men use their physical strength and numbers to overthrow the women and turn them into sex slaves and chattels

because the women will not have men to protect their position of power

they only have the position of power while there are men around to enforce and guarantee it - this means of course they have no real power

I'd like to see how those eight women kill each other first to determine which one rule the world 'cause only one woman is allowed to rule the world...Remember, men are doers women are manipulators...

This new reality series attempts to exactly that, putting eight feisty females in charge of ten macho males, and challenging them to create their own utopia on a beautiful Caribbean island
****

So just like the real world, anything of value or importance will have to be built by the men. How very interesting, I wonder if the "geniuses" who thought up this show even realize what they've done?

They've managed to create a show that not only proves a point nearly every MRA has stated, as well as give us all a peek at "eight feisty females" as they cat-fight and back stab each other for cash money.

It's kinda sad when they do all the work for us MRA types ain't it?

Quote from frostyboy

Tensions erupt as the two groups meet and the men are set to work by their new mistresses.

Gynarchie in free TV....somehow I want to see this show. Because I think the females are going to fail miserably....when is it running?

Quote from tiredofitall

This new reality series attempts to exactly that, putting eight feisty females in charge of ten macho males, and challenging them to create their own utopia on a beautiful Caribbean island
****

So just like the real world, anything of value or importance will have to be built by the men. How very interesting, I wonder if the "geniuses" who thought up this show even realize what they've done?

They've managed to create a show that not only proves a point nearly every MRA has stated, as well as give us all a peek at "eight feisty females" as they cat-fight and back stab each other for cash money.

It's kinda sad when they do all the work for us MRA types ain't it?

Exactly so. I would be interested to see if this "paradise island" comes already fully equipped with the stuff only men can produce (like houses, electricity, fresh water, sanitation and food) that of course the women simply take for granted (because they always do); or whether they are going to begin absolutely from scratch and have to get their own food and water, build their own houses etc. In which case those women had better get on their knees and thank their lucky stars that they have men around to do it for them , because they will never do it themselves.

And why should the programme end when the last man is left standing? The real fun would begin when all the men have left. Even if the women had their houses, food, water and other amenities all on tap at that time, it would be very interesting to see how long it lasted once the men had gone...

But of course I am dreaming. I doubt if the idea of the programme is to discover which sex is better at survival in a primitive environment, and how quickly women can wreck civilisation when left to their own devices. I bet the houses, food etc are already in place and get cleaned and replenished continuously by unseen hands off camera, leaving the guinea pigs free to pursue what women viewers invariably find much more interesting: their emotions and relationships.

In other words, it will be just another estrogen-fest for women.

I don't think I'll bother.

Young women are already aggressive and disrepectful to men, brought up, as they are, on a tv/film diet of female violence. But at least when a woman punches a man's face or machine guns ten men down in a film it is fantasy. This is reality tv. My worry is that this will have a bad affect on young girls. Ladette culture is already a big problem in this country.

I was going to post this as a thread until I saw frostyboy had done so. I'll just post it as is. Note the link to a trailer on Youtube for a taste.

When women ruled the world

Ok I haven't lost the plot. This is the title of a new British tv programme due to begin this thursday (4th sept) CH4 10.35pm - 11.40pm and CH4+ 11.35 - 12.40pm (GMT).

I believe foreign (non-UK) viewers can view CH4 programmes after they've initally aired http://www.channel4.com/.

Note that Steve Jones, a British male hyper-feminist academic that seems obsessed with "women ruling the world" is presenting the show. He's one of these pathetic men that pays dominatrixes (mostly self-confessed misandrists) to dominate and humiliate him for his pitiful sexual gratification.



At the end end of the trailer the narrator ask's "so what happens when women rule the world?" Absolute spiteful and hate-ridden catastrophe. That's what.

Looking at the trailer, I think you'll see this provides an extremely good experimental example as to why women when given power, especially over men, will viciously abuse it (mostly).

Men given the same opportunity will intially take the piss, after a while it will reach a point whereby they will conclude "we've gone too far, that's enough." Women in my experience when yielding power over men have no innate sense of restriction on their humiliating, nasty and animal behaviour. There's no ethical brake.

Quote from brian44

My worry is that this will have a bad affect on young girls. Ladette culture is already a big problem in this country.

This program will merely exacerbate the general vile and nasty attitude that permeates amongst so many young female attitudes. These females gullibly take their social cues as how to behave (or rather not!) from the anti-male rot that permanently infests the media.

As I previously mentioned, all these media social engineers will achieve is - instilling a rightful repulsion amongst those unaware or undecided against women attaining majoritive power over men.

It's no more of an easier decision than to not let children play with matches than to allow women to inact power over men! Both will end in disaster unless curbed.

This is a portion of the blog post I wrote about Fox's version that's been slated to air several times and always pushed back. I wrote this when it appeared imminent that it would finally air.....thankfully it never did. While I wrote this about Fox's series, I've no doubt it fully applies to the BBC's version as well.

Fox's 'When Women Rule The World' series to premiere March 3


That's right folks, mark your calendars and set your DVRs....it's back. Thanks to the current writer's guild strike, Fox has found themselves with some extra time slots on their hands. What does this mean for us? Well, on one hand it means no new season of '24'. On the other hand it means there's ample time to finally run the reality series 'If Women Ruled the World'...seems like a bit of an unfair trade to me.

Of course, I can already foresee where this is headed. It'll go in much the same direction as other reality t.v. series....with the women giving females everwhere reason to want to disavow their gender. They'll be catty and b*tchy, have stupid, petty fights, possibly culminating in hair pulling. Women such as myself will roll their eyes and offer a silent prayer that surely most women aren't really like this, while silently fearing they are.

While feminists are applauding the idea of a matriarchy promoting series, they don't realize that this should be their worst fear realized. I'm guessing any series where women are given full and total power will serve it's highest purpose as a vehicle to make us realize that a matriarchy is a really, really bad idea. Of course, I could be wrong and the women on the show will defy the reality television norm and behave calmly, fairly, judiciously and with dignity....I'm not holding my breath.

Ofcourse, one has to ask oneself, "what of the men?" What kind of men would volunteer to be part of such a disgusting travesty? Well, for starters, obviously the kind that are hoping to win $250,000. You almost have to wonder if they're actually saboteurs; men who foresaw the possibilities, the likelihood that this would be one of the best ways to denounce the concept of matriarchy and figured, "heck, maybe I can win $250,000 in the process." A nice, solid blow to feminism and a quarter of a million dollars to boot...not a bad turn of events.

I think this is awesome. If the trailer is any indication this is an attack on feminism.