Anyone in here have sons? How have you addressed the problem of educating them in an anti-male and "feminized" public school system that cares only about girls? I didnt realize to what extent the feminists have tried to keep boys from succeeding in school because of ideological theory and hate.

That sounds familiar but I wouldn't know because I don't have a child or a MONEY WORSHIPING BITCH TO ENSLAVE ME!!!!!

i tell my sons school is simply a survival experience/test, take what good you can from it while you can, there is plenty of time after school years to make your real mark on the world!!

Schools are just brainwashing centers these days. I remember when I was in school, they usually tried to drill their own PC agenda down your throat a lot of the time. Fucking pissed me right off.

I was fortunate in that i went to all boys school.. (Truly a privilege! But there was a difficult entrance exam of course!)..

From what I have seen of state schools, they are full of feminazi brainwashers..

I have shagged a few teachers, they are fucking sluts in the main..

Do I want these whores teaching my kids?

Well, I want to teach my kids what is what, and how they can get the best from school..

Lets face it, the cream always rises to the top, no matter what shit the shake at you!

Almost all of the teachers I had were female during my years in school, and I can only think of maybe 2 who were any good. The rest were agenda pushing bitches. I called one out on it when she started going on about racism. She was totally rattled by me. I'm proud of myself as I was only 14/15 at the time.

If I ever have my own child, and they have to go to a public school, I'm gonna let him/her know that they shouldn't let them brainwash you.

I think what they do to girls at school is equally as bad as what they do to boys.. In fact, i would say its worse because if girls follow the agenda they end up royally screwed in the head..

Unlike us men, when they see "the light" its usually too late, they are the wrong side of the hill and going down the other side fast!

Well women are already on their way down hill by the time they reach their late teens.

I indeed, which is as we know is round about the time that their "education" has been accomplished!!

University seems to have become nothing more than slut finishing/fattening school..

I remember my days trawling campus with Major Woody, my trouser-tenting lovegun..

Used to be a few fat hogs, and some fair spatterring of hotties..

But, I gotta say, there was a horrible stench of feminism in the air..

Now, the stink from the toxic cunt is much less, they are starting to see for themselves..

Unfortunately, the hog factor is much higher..

Seems they dont see the down side of feminism till they are wearing it round their waists.. And they are finding it hard to get a man willing to "oppress" them!

Its getting younger and younger theses days!!

Never been to college or Uni, due to my illnesses, I've been out of work since I left high school at 16. Hear it's pretty bad in those shit holes. Lots of pseudo intellectual manginas, and loads of screeching skanks moaning about raaaayyyypppe, and other horse shit.

Well, thats how it used to be.. Now they are not much different, only they are more interested in how to get "raped" than trying to avoid it..

A nice piece from MensNewsDaily. Dr Nemko may be known to MRAs:


Our Most Underserved Students: Smart, Active Boys
Marty Nemko
MensNewsDaily
March 31, 2008


When I was a boy, I just could not sit still in class. I was very bored and active by nature, so I would rock my chair back, whisper and write notes to kids, even wander around the classroom–until the teacher yelled, "Martin, sit down!"

This was decades ago. Today, I suspect I would have been put on Ritalin. But in either case, the blame is placed on the smart, active boy, rarely on the schools, which claim to celebrate diversity of learning styles and needs but stop celebrating when it comes to smart, active boys. Indeed, the decade's signature domestic policy, No Child Left Behind, redirects nearly all efforts to educate the lowest achievers.

This, of course, is ironic in that smart kids have the greatest potential to contribute to society: to cure its diseases, close the racial achievement gap, develop cost-effective solar power, ensure America's global competitiveness, etc.

The unfair treatment of smart, active boys comes from four factors:

1. The widespread abandonment of ability-grouped classes. In most of today's elementary schools, the bright and slow are placed in the same class. This creates more equality–especially racial equality–but the result is that all children receive a worse education. Imagine for example, that you spoke good Mandarin but wanted to become expert. Wouldn't you prefer a class with advanced students rather than one with both beginners and advanced students? Yet today, we don't give smart kids or their parents that choice. We force them into mixed-ability classes, where they learn little and are bored. And because, on average, boys are more active than girls, they more often can't sit still for six hours a day, five days a week, 180 days a year, year after year. Rather than the harder task of accommodating to smart active boys' needs, countless teachers have urged parents to put these boys, long-term, on Ritalin–a meth-like drug.

2. That elementary school teachers are overwhelmingly female. Today, the percentage is up to 92%, the highest ever recorded. Even if teachers believe they're accommodating to all students' needs, they can't help but tilt their teaching to what appeals to them. Thus, students stories of male heroism are replaced by stories of female relationships and heroines, typically in which an inferior male is shown-up by a wise female. Competition–a prime motivator for boys–is replaced by so-called "cooperative-learning," which usually reduces to the bright doing the slow's work, boring the bright kid and precluding him from learning new things.

3. The media's continuing to perpetrate the myth that females are oppressed and males are the oppressor. For example, they continue to spout these disproven assertions:
– women earn 79 cents on the dollar compared with men. In fact, for the same work, women earn the same as men.
– women are underrepresented in high-level positions because of sexism. In fact, as documented in recent well-reviewed books such as Susan Pinker's The Sexual Paradox, women's not being in high-office comes much more from choosing to have a less work-centric lifestyle.
– the schools shortchange girls relative to boys. (the long-debunked Reviving Ophelia canard.)
– men abuse women–in fact, studies show that 30 to 52% of severe domestic violence is perpetrated by women.

Thus, the subconsciously or consciously held feeling among educators, policymakers, and the public, is that we need to do more for females than for males, ignoring such statistics that boys are achieving far worse in school than are girls, much more likely to abuse drugs, commit suicide, and drop out of high school, far less likely to graduate from college, much more likely, as young adults, to be sleeping late unemployed on their parents' sofas.

4. Society's bias that says: let's help those with the greatest deficit rather than those with the greatest potential to profit: "Those smart boys will do okay without special help. Let's focus our efforts on the lowest achievers." I deeply believe that such a philosophy will reduce our society to the lowest common denominator, ironically resulting in a worse life for us all. Besides, it simply is unfair for the public schools to not provide at least a marginally appropriate education for all kids, and right now, smart boys get the very least appropriate education.

Dr. Nemko is co-president of the National Organization for Men. He holds a Ph.D in education from the University of California, Berkeley and subsequently taught there. 500+ of his published writings are free on www.martynemko.com.

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/03/31/...t-active-boys/