Thread: Violence? Not likely..
- Member Since
- Nov 2005
- My Blog Entries:
Violence? Not likely..
Innocent Acts of Rebellion Against Patriarchy
by Amynda @ 1:09 am. Filed under Women Are Never Violent
Over the past two weeks, St. Louis has seen a number of incidents in which a number of liberated, ass-kicking wimmin have been accused of (get this) murder, or planning murder.
Of couse, itÂ’s unmitigated bullcrap. First of all, wimmin are never violent. The whole idea of violent wimyn is but a Backlash phenominon, rooted in paranoid and primitive male fantasies.
Second of all, if the accused actually did do the stuff theyÂ’re accused of then they all had good reasons for it.
For instance, Connie Raybourn was arrested for supposedly killing her husband for the insurance money. A likely fairy-tale.
Is THIS the face of a criminal? She wouldnÂ’t hurt a fly!
Joann Godt was charged with supposedly murdering her husband as part of a pattern of spousal abuse. Such a thing could not happen because females donÂ’t do that. And if it did happen, then her husband deserved it anyway because he was probably a no-good bastard who abused his spouse. Anyone who abuses their spouse is a criminalÂ… except when the abuser has a vagina. And that never happens, because feminists have proven it via repeated assertion. (Please donÂ’t read the bits of the article that contradict me, by the way.)
And finally, Maritha Hunter-Butler was arrested when she attempted to hire a hit-man in a foiled murder-for-insurance plan. Conspiracy to commit murder? ThatÂ’s nonsense. I wouldnÂ’t get graded if I were in a conspiracy to write a bad term paper that I ended up not handing-in. Am I right or what?
These three instances are all bum raps. And Â“MurderÂ” is such a strong word for it anyway. I prefer to call these Â“Innocent Acts of Rebellion Against PatriarchyÂ”.
Oh, and hereÂ’s another ass-kicking, feisty, liberated, white upper-class womyn who gets punished for innocently rebelling: Nancy Kissel was found guilty by a Hong Kong jury of drugging her husband and bludgeoning him to death. She was horribly abused, but that excuse didnÂ’t seem to work because of so-called Â“contradictionsÂ” in her story. Look, her abuse was so severe that she couldnÂ’t report it to the police or to anybody else while it was happening to her. The fact that she stood to gain millions by her husbandÂ’s death is utterly irrelevant to the case.
The fact remains that wimyn are so utterly oppressed in our wimmin-hating society that any crazy thing a womyn ever does is yet more evidence of how horribly held-down and disadvantaged she is. These so-called Â“murdersÂ” are, in fact, perfect proof that females have lives of degradation and misery. The accused shouldnÂ’t be put in jail because isnÂ’t being born a womyn in a manÂ’s world punishment enough?
These poor souls had no choice to do what they did. And they didnÂ’t do it anyway. Let them go free immediately!