What a mess things have become since women got the vote, give what we see of the world now a days in the western nations it goes to show that women are not moral enough to be allowed into poltics, sorry but the truth is the truth.
Pretty soon men will not have the right to vote at all but still have to be the ones to keep the sick western socties running though hard work blood on the battlefeilds and whatever else is requaered to keeo western socity running.
Fuck it, if I was the PM of Canada I'd tear down the system completly and rebuild it into some better, all though I'd probale be assassinated for doing so.

Quote from Marx

It's one example.

Over here, in England, feminists use the same mislogic and selective acknowledgement as do those in USA and other countries. In New Zealand, it took only two years. However, I don't know (and haven't happened upon) any articles about the full history to it unfolding. Nonetheless, why do feminists only ever talk about HALF THE ISSUE? Why do they try to mislead people - intentionally - into believing that men could vote since time began while women couldn't?

It is clearly dishonest of them.

This is ONE example to demonstrate the dishonesty feminists rely on.

Do you realise, in another article comment about misandry, a feminist just days ago claimed that women could not vote until only 50 years ago!!!!

FIFTY years!

LMFAO


This is the level of dishonesty, deceit and underhanded tactics this site aims to highlight.

If that offends you, then you're welcome to believe the feminist 'variations' of history... *ahem* HERSTORY they dish out for you.

An excellent reply.


The early men`s voting movement wanted to team up with the women to have “Votes for all” regardless of gender, race, etc.


The women`s movement turned them down, this shows that from it`s inception, the women`s movement was “Anti-male” indeed, we can go further, and state that the women`s movemennt, is actually “Anti-everyone” men, women and children.


What kind of a spirit is against everyone, and is also a lying spirit ?

Rob, information on that would excellent to have added as a related resource. Could you look into finding some links & articles on it, please?

Hi Marx,


This video is excellent:


Suffrage | Man Woman & Myth


In the video we see a male Police Officer arresting a Suffragette, this male Police Officer, almost certainly could not vote.

Thanks Rob, I've added the video to the bottom of the article page:
http://antimisandry.com/articles/tru...n-vote-22.html

Quote from Incognito

[/LEFT]
It took ten years in your country....but your country isn't the entire world, is it? In fact, your country is so tiny compared to the rest of the world that it's odd you should hold it up as some sort of template of history for everybody else. That's, after all, such an "American" thing to do...ha ha! You're really off-base (hope you don't mind me saying) if you look at one country's suffrage history and disregard all others to prove a point.

He's English, and has to deal with the lies of ENGLISH feminists, as regards when ENGLISH women got the vote, so............

It took ten years in your country....but your country isn't the entire world, is it? In fact, your country is so tiny compared to the rest of the world that it's odd you should hold it up as some sort of template of history for everybody else. That's, after all, such an "American" thing to do...ha ha! You're really off-base (hope you don't mind me saying) if you look at one country's suffrage history and disregard all others to prove a point.

At the start of the First World War one quarter of the earth's land surface was ruled from London and one third of the world's population lived under British law. Feminism has been particularly virulent in all of the larger former British colonies.

The article is very relevant.

You're not doing your movement any favors denying that women lagged behind men in the right to vote all over the world. Whether it's two years or ten, the fact that you disregard it as completely meaningless makes it hard to take your victim mentality seriously. There are some places in the world today that women still can't vote and I suppose that's all bullshit to you, too.

*rolls eyes*

Look at the issue from a slightly different direction.

MOST people were unable to vote in the 19C.

In the late 19C and early 20C, Men lead the way, opening the door for women to follow through.

Just like the chivalrous act of opening a door for a woman, the man is at fault.

Women act ungratefully and blame the men.

Many, many men died to win the Universal Franchise.

Very few women did.

Quote from Incognito

You're not doing your movement any favors denying that women lagged behind men in the right to vote all over the world. Whether it's two years or ten, the fact that you disregard it as completely meaningless makes it hard to take your victim mentality seriously. There are some places in the world today that women still can't vote and I suppose that's all bullshit to you, too.

*rolls eyes*

Hi Tera,

You are 100% correct, women did lag behind men in getting the vote, and that in my opinion was wrong.

The problem that I have with feminists is that they purposefully give the impression that all men could vote whilst at the exact same time no women could vote, this is deception, which I hate.


Rob.

Quote from Incognito

You're not doing your movement any favors denying that women lagged behind men in the right to vote all over the world. Whether it's two years or ten, the fact that you disregard it as completely meaningless makes it hard to take your victim mentality seriously. There are some places in the world today that women still can't vote and I suppose that's all bullshit to you, too.

*rolls eyes*

First off - please do not resort to telling porkies. No one has denied that women lagged behind men in the right to vote. What has been done with this article is point out that it is NOT the 'centuries' behind that feminists pretend it is. What the article does vs what you say it does are two very, very different things. It also points out that for men to get the vote was a very costly process which women did not want to help with, yet many men assisted women's right to vote. If anything, women made it a lot harder for men & women to their rights to vote.

Quote from RobYork

...feminists is that they purposefully give the impression that all men could vote whilst at the exact same time no women could vote, this is deception...

Precisely.

The point is, Tera, feminists (English and those outside England) intentionaly deceive the masses into a belief surrounding the issues of the vote. This is one lie of theirs that is exposed. I hope other MRA's from around the globe can put up similar articles about their country's vote. It seems very unfortunate that you appear upset that facts are exposed to undo the misrepresentation of education. If you watch the video, the narrator even mentions that men's suffrage is not even mentioned during history classes, which is exactly the same for me too. Why are you upset about men trying to find the full facts behind the propaganda used to demonoize them - even resorting to referring to 'facts' as 'victim mentality'?

Surely you're not against men and women knowing the truth... are you?

Quote from Marx

First off - please do not resort to telling porkies. No one has denied that women lagged behind men in the right to vote. What has been done with this article is point out that it is NOT the 'centuries' behind that feminists pretend it is. What the article does vs what you say it does are two very, very different things. It also points out that for men to get the vote was a very costly process which women did not want to help with, yet many men assisted women's right to vote. If anything, women made it a lot harder for men & women to their rights to vote.



Precisely.

The point is, Tera, feminists (English and those outside England) intentionaly deceive the masses into a belief surrounding the issues of the vote. This is one lie of theirs that is exposed. I hope other MRA's from around the globe can put up similar articles about their country's vote. It seems very unfortunate that you appear upset that facts are exposed to undo the misrepresentation of education. If you watch the video, the narrator even mentions that men's suffrage is not even mentioned during history classes, which is exactly the same for me too. Why are you upset about men trying to find the full facts behind the propaganda used to demonoize them - even resorting to referring to 'facts' as 'victim mentality'?

Surely you're not against men and women knowing the truth... are you?

Of course she was going to bark at you, because you've exposed her and feminists for what they are, thieves and liars!

Damn this is more livly then a rerun of " The Young and the Breastless! " or " The Old and the Useless. " LOL

Consider the amount of responsibilities that men have compare to women, it's only fair that men have the right to vote first. Hell, here in the US women have the right to vote without having to register for SS - same rights (or should I say more than equal rights) less responsibilities, "equality" everyone?

Women didn't even have to "fight" for the right to vote, they whine and demand for it and the men in power basically just gave it to them; so feminists are in position to whine about the vote..