Thread: The term, "mangina"

I have used this term on many occasions. One of the most popular time was when I called out some feminised cretin on the Mensnewsdaily by the name of Stephen Guess. A feminist mangina, who got really pissed off with being accused of being one when Bernard Chapin picked up the word and did a commentary on it...

My interpretation of "mangina" has two meanings..

1. a male that supports feminism to the deterioration of his own sex.
2. a gutless wimp determined to have a relationship with a woman under any circumstance, regardless of the level of abuse, be it verbal, psychological or physical.

I think a mangina is a man in touch with his spiritual side, who has mystic powers connecting him to all spiritual forces. This is why we make good councilors or psychologists for we have special powers to see into people's souls and bring out their love! If you don't mind gay men then you shouldn't be against men embracing their female side.

I agree with Myce, labeling men angrily mangina is wrong for it means you must have something against women, and thus Myce and other women too. How rude! I think we should just use the psychological term warm fuzzies for it so much nicer and we all want to be nice, right!
Peace & Love

Quote from Mangina

I think a mangina is a man in touch with his spiritual side, who has mystic powers connecting him to all spiritual forces. This is why we make good councilors or psychologists for we have special powers to see into people's souls and bring out their love! If you don't mind gay men then you shouldn't be against men embracing their female side.

In touch with his spiritual side is the same as "feminine" side...

A. Spiritual side is just another way of explaining the fact that you will pay for all those insignificant spiritual courses and actually believe in astrology.....

B. If there was any potential of me coming to express my feminine side, I would see a priest and have that bitch, exorcised..

A Mangina never conquers fears when they present themselves. Conquering one or two ( tempest in a tea pot) is not what I'm talking about. Young men will conquer a fear (in say sky diving, something of which I'm am afraid to do) and they may do this and other scary things again and again. They have become men in their ability to deal with fear, but this still doesn't make a full man or even an honorable man.

There are other fears, less glamorous, that people are afraid of. For example: being alone, having no one to talk to, doing something for a long time that is boring that needs to be done, doing something that will not bring you fame (or might even bring you anti-fame), or doing something that will make everyone mock you as ugly disgusting or something- that still needs to be done etc. Women will be unable to check many, to all, of the above or be dishonest and brag she can, but will in fact build her life around not facing any of the dangerous and non-dangerous issues (or in other words not push the envelope). She will do the opposite in fact.

So for example if I need to sky dive for a reason in my life, I think I can conquer it for I've overcome similar things in the past, that I was afraid of. Seeking out the dangers of life are endless and are for boys reveling in their becoming men, but it is the other ones I describe above that need over coming too. Then when you do these things for more than yourself, you come to confront some ideas of honor, that may not in deed match my own, but you will still receive respect from me regardless.

When you rationalize the lack of need to confront any of these kind of issues, that come up in ones life, you are either a woman or a mangina. A women can admit she can't do these things, and honor a man that can, and thus accepts her limitations openly, while a mangina has a much harder time accepting he can't do any of these things and thus must deform the situation, like feminists do, in wishing to change what is brave, strong or good. Like talking brave at art shows where absolutely nothing will happen to you no mater what you say, or turning things to the endlessly vauge spritual world (or its modern version of the dream psychology world) where they make themselves out to have special powers that make them trump mens real world skills. Or even hide out in awards or the seats of power where success is said to be more important than being a man. You can endlessly pick your poisons to avoid looking at the fact you have sold out your soul if you want to play the endless games of effeminates!

Rob Roy: Honor is a gift a man gives himself.

Quote from Mangina

I think a mangina is a man in touch with his spiritual side, who has mystic powers connecting him to all spiritual forces. This is why we make good councilors or psychologists for we have special powers to see into people's souls and bring out their love! If you don't mind gay men then you shouldn't be against men embracing their female side.

I agree with Myce, labeling men angrily mangina is wrong for it means you must have something against women, and thus Myce and other women too. How rude! I think we should just use the psychological term warm fuzzies for it so much nicer and we all want to be nice, right!
Peace & Love

Yeah, and I'd bet you regularly visit ladies like these, too....

You can whip and dominate me like that any time, Annette.

Quote from Feminist_Scum

You can whip and dominate me like that any time, Annette.

Heh heh...

Even the Urban Dictionary cannot decide it's meaning..

1. man-gina
when a man puts his dick between his legs and it looks like a vagina


2. man-gina
Mangina or Man-gina would be gay slang for anus, ass or man-cunt. Often used on the leather scene but on the whole it is a generic term for a guy's butt hole.

3. man-gina
An illusion where a man "tucks his stuff" (i.e., hides his genitalia between his legs) thereby giving his pubic region the apperance of that of a female's.

The insane popularity of this trick is usually traced to (credited to or blamed on) the 1991 Jonathan Demme movie "The Silence of the Lambs"

I dont like the term mangina, but it is accepted it seems.. Some men are naturally "effeminate" in some ways and I dont see why we have to lump these fellows in the same bracket as the fools who sell their souls to feminism..

I like the terms, "poodles", "poodleboys", etc.. and my own oft used term, "flange maggots" to describe blokes who prostrate themselves before the flange as their chosen way of getting access to capital..

Since in the film "Thunderbirds" the puppet chaufer (car driver!) Parker was regarded as the "ultimate womans accessory" for Lady Penelope, we could perhaps use the term "Parkers" perhaps?

Quote from Drex

Some men are naturally "effeminate" in some ways and I dont see why we have to lump these fellows in the same bracket as the fools who sell their souls to feminism

Agreed. Effeminate nerds and geeks have enough trouble with bullying and female shaming.

Quote from Drex

Since in the film "Thunderbirds" the puppet chaufer (car driver!) Parker was regarded as the "ultimate womans accessory" for Lady Penelope, we could perhaps use the term "Parkers" perhaps?

My wife's family name is Parker... I'm not sure I managed to be her ultimate accessory though, unless metaphoric punch bag serves the same function?

Quote from Drex

Since in the film "Thunderbirds" the puppet chaufer (car driver!) Parker was regarded as the "ultimate womans accessory" for Lady Penelope, we could perhaps use the term "Parkers" perhaps?

I've just watched Thunderbirds and am mad at what they did with lady Penelope, making her an azz-kicking fembot. The female characters were all over-the-top superwomen actually.

More like someone wanted to put Emma Peel in the film than tell a Thunderbirds story.

Quote from Drex

I dont like the term mangina, but it is accepted it seems.. Some men are naturally "effeminate" in some ways and I dont see why we have to lump these fellows in the same bracket as the fools who sell their souls to feminism..

I like the terms, "poodles", "poodleboys", etc.. and my own oft used term, "flange maggots" to describe blokes who prostrate themselves before the flange as their chosen way of getting access to capital..

Since in the film "Thunderbirds" the puppet chaufer (car driver!) Parker was regarded as the "ultimate womans accessory" for Lady Penelope, we could perhaps use the term "Parkers" perhaps?

Too bad, the men's movement will continue to use that term to describe gutless wonders that turn against his own sex like Flood or the idiot Hugo..

Quote from christianj

Too bad, the men's movement will continue to use that term to describe gutless wonders that turn against his own sex like Flood or the idiot Hugo..

Yes, I also use the term a lot in that definition and it seems to be well liked. Mt reservations about the term stem from the points you have noted, i.e. it is used "mainstream" in other ways..