This isnt even the half of it..

Note there is no mention of what represents a "couple"..

I would wager that if one is to consider the natural biological family, of father and mother and kids all living together and sharing their DNA in the traditional biofamily manner then we would be looking at halving that figure again..

It would not surprise me if less than 20% of kids live in such a family.

The causes?

Perverse incentivisation of the single parent lifestyle.

More riot's eventually coming your way.

I guess the British Empire has a lot to answer for.

Where is feminism at its most powerful and destructive? In Britain and its former colonies, that's where.

Seems those noble ideals of "fair play" have backfired - or been subverted by eekwalitee.

Quote from felixblue

This isnt even the half of it..

Note there is no mention of what represents a "couple"..

I would wager that if one is to consider the natural biological family, of father and mother and kids all living together and sharing their DNA in the traditional biofamily manner then we would be looking at halving that figure again..

It would not surprise me if less than 20% of kids live in such a family.

The causes?

Perverse incentivisation of the single parent lifestyle.

The writing is on the wall. As the destruction of the family continues, the power of the state increases until the breaking point is reached. Most men act like sheep and just accept their lot in life. Where are the Rams?

Anyone with an open mind and room temperature I.Q. can see that the intentional destruction of the family unit will lead to massive social unrest. The states response is more and more repression and violent enforcement of it's social edicts.

Change won't happen with only a few MP's speaking out, it will only come when the sheep wake up and refuse to play the game and be herded to get sheared on a yearly basis ( analogy to taxes of course).

America and Europe are not far behind in the single mother worship ideology.

Change will eventually come, it always does. Except this time around the change won't be non-violent. Men can only be pushed so far before they respond, often with explosive anger and extreme violence. The state wants that because it gives them the reason they need to clamp down of male behavior even more.

The state never learns from history. More and more repression breeds more and more anger and defiance with violent change as the outcome. History has taught us that oppressive regimes eventually fall due to their hubris.

Current regimes in the west have sided with feminism and women as their allies to keep the power flowing to the top. Sooner or later men will cast the yoke off their necks and force change. It ain't going to be nice, nor civil, or gentlemanly.

Quote from outdoors

More riot's eventually coming your way.

Hopefully!

Now it's illegal to initiate riots/civil war and that's not my aim. But I hope we have a massive civil war very soon. We won't though, because the whole point of welfare, is to make people dependant upon the state. Civil wars are tremendous and if it weren't illegal should be encouraged. Look at the reforms the American civil war did for the US, the French revolution, the gunpowder plot in the UK we still celebrate. It's like a shiny red reset button.

The riots started for a good reason, pigs shooting first, asking later and the Mets are one of the most unreasonable forces going. However it just became looting and that annoyed me. I wanted to yell at them (not that I was near them, or even if I was if they would listen) "hey, you're hatred is at the police and the government which over the past couple of decades have completely screwed up this country, take action against them instead of looting small struggling businesses". If they had stayed on target, I would have cheered them on.

Quote from Celtic Druid

It's the wet dream of Marxists and feminists. Decades of social destruction coming to fruition for these useful idiots.


Successive governments have allowed our national industries to be run down in preparation for the succession of the EU as our new masters. Those same political elites willingly and feebly allowed feminism, as a sub-set of Marxism, to dismantle the traditional family unopposed!

How many whacks over the head do the pro-family lobbyists need to start mobilizing in oppossing the family-destroying agenda of feminism? And when will the church speak out, or has that been totally consumed by the ideologues also?

But isn't it all so predictable when government builds a social model which disproportionately favours single-parent families, and then proceeds to strip away the incentives for married loving couples to raise children? Is this outcome really any frigging surprise?

And still, despite it all, you'll hear the liberals bandy around socialist buzzwords like 'progressive' to describe something intrinsically regressive about this new social arrangement!

It really is screwed up.

It affects peoples morality and ethos nowadays as well. The OH and I get treated by some people asking about us as if we're mentally ill. They'll ask how long we've been together and then say "Wow that's a long time! Are you married yet?", then act astonished we aren't married, a few bible bashers who had kids before they got married will proceed to tell me how we're living in sin. Aside from the hypocritical nature, we were sinning as soon as we engaged in sex in the first place, so why would marriage suddenly bother me? Then comes "How many kids have you got?" and seem surprised when I say none, as if there is something wrong with us, for not squeezing kids out by the roomful and getting married within a few years of meeting, not enjoying any time together or doing any travelling or anything, no that's weird! You have to hump like rabbits and forget about anything else apparently! It gets to the point, that for many small minds, I have to oversimplify and explain we aren't there yet.

It just seems in Britain, that if you fall in to any of the categories below, there is something odd or seriously wrong with you (I tend to think the exact opposite actually):
- You don't have kids
- Have them all with the same woman
- Don't marry a woman within five years of meeting, even if you know things aren't quite right and you're going to divorce
- Use protection or get yourself tested before going bareback with a new partner
- Speak to people nicely/politely (some people think it's creepy just to use good manners for some reason)

I just find it all extremely queer! Then people wonder why I think British society is raving mad.

Quote from The Possible Human

Change will eventually come, it always does. Except this time around the change won't be non-violent. Men can only be pushed so far before they respond, often with explosive anger and extreme violence. The state wants that because it gives them the reason they need to clamp down of male behavior even more.

The state never learns from history. More and more repression breeds more and more anger and defiance with violent change as the outcome. History has taught us that oppressive regimes eventually fall due to their hubris.

Current regimes in the west have sided with feminism and women as their allies to keep the power flowing to the top. Sooner or later men will cast the yoke off their necks and force change. It ain't going to be nice, nor civil, or gentlemanly.

Oh I completely agree.

But long term, I think it is the aim, to breed out urgency in society, to create an apathetic state, one dependant on governments not only for subsistence but just for someone to tell them what to think, what's right and wrong and how they should feel. All of this happens now.

In the long run though, they will breed out heterosexual men and a violent war, is just the reason they need to gas us or put us all in electric chairs. Milgram proved that most of humanity, will gladly assist and kill other people, just because they are told to by someone else, especially if all responsibility is absolved. All of this will make Hitler look like a small time serial killer, compared to the genocide coming up in the future.

The situation of the traditional family is now so eroded that it will take another oil crisis to finish it off, and every one knows how often those crisis occurred in the past.
Removing the incentives a family gives to a man will just compound the problem. Fatherhood, is no longer a duty, just a priviledge awarded by government through anti family legislation, as in "you will be a father as we tell you when and why" . History tell us when that occurred before, in the thirties and forties, when the ruling party in Germany ordered all germans to create a baby boom.
The encouragement of teenage single mothers has similar connotations. Hence, disfunctionality in a society is assured.

NEVO