I don't watch much TV as it's usually full of shit - absolute shit.

Tonight, however, I did watch a film or two and began channel hopping for a while. I landed on Sky3 and watched a couple of 'Road Wars' episodes from 2008 (i.e. repeats, as is so typical of television).

Anyway, after watching one episode, I wrote to Thames Valley Police complaints departments - at this url:

Thames Valley Police - Making a complaint

professional.standards@thamesvalley.pnn.police.uk <--- Professional Standards department.

QoSUnit@thamesvalley.pnn.police.uk <--- Quality of Service department.

Here is my email to them, which I doubt will get a reply:

Dear Sir or Madam,

I have just finished watching the programme, Road Wars, on Sky 3. I believe the programme in question was from 2008. I was rather disgusted by the officer's treatment of a man who had been caught engaging in consensual sex with an adult woman in their car.

While I understand it is inappropriate, the officers treated him like scum - yet the other consenting adult was treated as a victim. Why?

Below I shall list a few of the quotes and behaviours of the officers filmed.

"You're the one with no clothes on in a public place.... outside a school... don't talk to me about decency." - This clearly demonstrates the officers opinion of the man who was an equal partner in an inappropriate public conduct.

Although I realise this is nothing to do with the officers in question, they set the tone of the situation and so the narrator refers to him as 'Mr. Loverman' while referring to his consenting sexual partner as a 'lady'.

We're then told, "Conrad needs to check the 'Lady passenger' is 'happy'." – As the police are supposed to set the example for society behaviours & standards, are we – the public - to assume all men caught in compromising situations are rapists? That was most definitely implied by the officer referred to as Conrad, who went on to ask the 'lady passenger' various questions to lead her into either accusing the innocent-until-proven-guilty man of rape, or consensual sex.

"Irrespective of what's going on in the car - do you know this man - are you close friends - are you here of your own free will?" etc. etc. Amazingly, while the man is given lessons on moral conducts, the officer even went as far as to clarify he was NOT giving her a moral lecture. Why are the two consenting adults treated so differently by your officers for the very same situation?

Why would the police feel a need to plant ideas in a woman's mind that she is being raped? Are our police forces so incapable of fighting real crimes they need to fabricate crimes?

Note how they treat the man like a criminal - yet treat the woman like she is a victim. Note also how they treat her civilly, but talk to the man like he's already assumed guilty. Again, note how the officers had to ensure she was a potential victim - the man is treated as a potential rapist.

Your officers’ treatment of an innocent-until-proven-guilty man was absolutely disgusting. You should be ashamed. I assume this behaviour is taught to your officers thanks to feminist ideology indoctrination - which teaches that all men are potential rapists and evil.

Discrimination like this is not acceptable, so why do you promote it?

Do you teach your officers to assume all black men are drug dealers and all white men are victimized addicts? Do you teach your offices to ask questions to the white people to try and lead them into calling the black guys dealers? Do you treat all people from council estates as thugs and people from private areas as victims?

I'm going to assume the answers to my above questions would be "no"... which I'm glad to hear. So it begs the question, why are your officers taught to treat men as rapists?

I look forward to your explanation of this discriminatory behaviour and policy (I assume the officers were following policy, yes?) If this is not police policy, I do hope you will be educating your officers on how to treat men & women with genuine equality, as oppose this inequality that I have observed this evening.



Best regards,

Concerned Citizen.