I can understand anyone who has seen 'revolution' and 'violence' at first hand.

I can also see a difference between direct action, including violence, driven by righteousness and that driven by evil. Even Christ advised on selling stuff to buy a sword.

I do not advocate violence, but I am too old in the tooth to ignore human reaction to assault. While I might not readily take up arms, nor people like me, there is a Darren Mack for every one of us. I do not condemn him. A full metal jacket brokers no arguement.

There is violence and violence. I do advocate dropping some of the more limiting aspects of civilised consideration when dealing with many of the more 'profiled' people who spread or gain from men's distress.

I do advocate picketing Judges homes, for example, as has been done in NZ and by good old Jolly Stansby who sat on a Judge's roof. I do advocate digging dirt and using it. I do advocate trashing reputation, ruining careers, ransacking personal treasuries, dislocating personal relationships, alienating femonazi's families.

Wars are rarely won simply by lobbing shells or shooting through windows from car parks. Psychological warfare is a good methodology as far as I am concerned. (I did the NATO psywar course years ago). The Truth is preferable - White propaganda, but gray propaganda has been used - and is used - against men and should be used against femonazis. And worse. Men are subject to lies - Black Propaganda. Maybe I would not go that far. But then....

The MRM has to get clever. It has to think creatively. It has to 'fight' rather than simply argue. The Princess of Lies laughs at us because we are too damn civil. We have to make it so expensive, personally, to the 'players' in the great Feminazi Mafia, that they flee. They ain't going away otherwise.

Actually violence is an admission of failure.. A bit like going to court...

Its the fear of that that makes things happen..

I believe folk are in the main motivated by fear...

Quote from Drex

I believe folk are in the main motivated by fear...

Sad but true Drex

Got to say i disagree, violence is the easiest way of solving any problem. An admission of failure? The only one who failed is the dead guy.

Well, the dead guy (if it has to come to that!) has clearly failed, but the others also lose out because the dead guy is never going to be converted by persuasion of the validity of the victors claim to the moral high ground..

I personally am ready to do violence provided it is attempted against me first. Violence is appropriate only when responding to it in my opinion.

I'm a coward, I nearly always run away... a bit like that scene from Monty Python with the killer rabbit.

Aye, running away is usually a fair choice and a good decision!

That was flipping hilarious Karl LOFL!!!

Yes its prudent sometimes to run. I asked a cop what he did when faced 6 foot 8 heavy in a bar room brawl.Let them get on with it he said I only go for
those I know I can take leave the big guys to the big cops.
Why go in to something where its guaranteed you will get serious injury?
Thats not bravery thats folly....

Quote from Marx

I'm a coward, I nearly always run away... a bit like that scene from Monty Python with the killer rabbit.

lol Karl you're such a macho patriarchal brute

Got to say i disagree, violence is the easiest way of solving any problem. An admission of failure? The only one who failed is the dead guy.

Jesus Christ executed - end result, Christianity
Grandsons of the Prophet Mohammed killed - end result, Shia Islam
Guru Gobind Singh murdered - end result, Sikhism

Arch-Duke Ferdinand of Austria assassinated - result, WWI
Marshall Titov dies naturally - end result, breakup of Yugoslavia into warring states
John F. Kennedy assassinated - end result, feminism becomes a worldwide commodity

Darren Mack awaits his sentence. He may or may not be executed.

Sometimes the ‘dead guys’ have enough friends. Sometimes they don’t.

Yan Yan said:
John F. Kennedy assassinated - end result, feminism becomes a worldwide commodity

I tend to agree that this event was crucial for my generation (baby boomers). Do you think this was the turning point for second wave harpyism?

I don't assault people unless assaulted first. If a woman struck me first, she better be able to run fast, 'cos I'd give her such a slapping. The only people I won't hit are children, not because I think they are special, but because they aren't a lost cause and can still be taught not to initiate violence. Women, the disabled, and old people are all fair game if they strike first. They should keep their fucking hands to theirselves.

Quote from Yan Yan

Jesus Christ executed - end result, Christianity
Grandsons of the Prophet Mohammed killed - end result, Shia Islam
Guru Gobind Singh murdered - end result, Sikhism

Arch-Duke Ferdinand of Austria assassinated - result, WWI
Marshall Titov dies naturally - end result, breakup of Yugoslavia into warring states
John F. Kennedy assassinated - end result, feminism becomes a worldwide commodity

Darren Mack awaits his sentence. He may or may not be executed.

Sometimes the ‘dead guys’ have enough friends. Sometimes they don’t.

Precisely, simply killing all their friends when you do away with them should do the trick. Remember, if brute force isn't working, you aren't using enough.