Prepared to be angry: What it means to be male
This is a discussion on Prepared to be angry: What it means to be male within the Chit chat (MAIN) anti misandry forums, part of the Introduction to anti misandry category; Quote from Yan Yan Or is it because women spend more - usually on worthless junk? Diverting wealth from men ...
- 25th-October-2007 #31
Re: Prepared to be angry: What it means to be male
An excellent post. Here you pack a great deal of insight into a very short space - talk about effeciency! Recognizing that feminism is decidedly linked to materialism is an important first step in understanding how something so left wing as feminism, can walk hand and hand down the isle with right wing capitalism. Feminists had help in implementing their agenda, if for reasons of greed alone.
I certainly don't intend to gang up on the judge, especially when I agree with him for the most part. Just as he might regard you and I as a little too pessimistic, we cannot help but see his cheery optimism in epic faery tale proportions.
- 25th-October-2007 # ADS
Advertisement Circuit advertisement- Member Since
- Always
- Posts
- Many
- 26th-October-2007 #32
Re: Prepared to be angry: What it means to be male
Bugger Hollywood. The 'system' of civil management is corrupt. The whole system. There are so many rent-seeking scum engaged in the destruction of our civilisation that only ruthless leadership from the top will be able to root out all the rot. Most of the 'players' in the system are quite unaware of their complicity in the damage that is being done. That will not save them. They are too busy taking their salaries from the public purse.
A start has to be made somewhere and, frankly, I agree with my furious Gnome friend, Amfortas. Here is what he had to say in a recent Presidential Candidate interview on MND, elaborating on the marriage question:
The disgraceful and iniquitous anti-family and anti-father legislations have to go. No tinkering. Swept away. It is the leading rot producer. Just how he might bring this about in the face of expected opposition, he had this to say:Fourth Question: Do you believe in marriage between a man and a woman? Would you let gays get married?
I am glad you asked that, Joy. Or should I call you Mistress Joyanna? I believe strongly in marriage. And fidelity. Men and women are a coupling made in heaven and I will cast into Hell-on-Alcatraz ( I will be re-opening that place by the way) all those anti-Family Court scum that have done so much to destroy it. We may need a few more similar island prisons but I will make sure we don’t go down the old luxury apartment route.
The ‘old’ idea of marriage is what I have in mind. Vows, held to by adults. For better and for worse. No backsliding when the going inevitably gets a bit tough. In sickness and health. Marry a loony and live with your choice. Loonies need love too. Maybe choose more carefully. Marry a man, not a wallet. Marry a woman, not a mirage. Get some character and maturity before you even start.
None of this divorce at whim carnage. There is a lot to undo. Gays marrying? A pervert’s fantasy. No way. Not that I care a monkeys toss about this or that person’s sexual proclivities but Marriage is about love and male-female bonking and family, which means children. Children need a father and a mother; no ifs, no buts. No rampant single-motherhood nonsense either. Knickers up and knees together if you ain’t hitched.
My Administration will get out of the Marriage business altogether. None of my damned business managing the process. Contract law is quite able to deal with it. Break your contract and you have to compensate your partner. There is nothing complicated about it. Equal dissolution by mutual agreement? Fine. No unilateralism. Take out what you put in and split the jointly developed assets as per input. No more of this corruption by lawyers and judges stripping family assets. No more massive payouts to crooked partners. Kids? You are both wholly, jointly and severally totally responsible. Deal with it. Do it right or I will then step in and whack you. Poison their young minds against one or the other and its out a high friggin’ window, like a Professor.
My first 100 days will see a wholescale dismantling of the anti-Family Court, along with most other Courts too. There will be much gnashing of teeth, for those few legal carrion that retain their teeth. Corruption will be severely dealt with. I will be seeking out true men and women but expect to find only a few. There will be Appointments of ordinary sensible people to the Bench. Preferably heavy goods vehicle drivers and electrical linesmen. The words ‘Truth’ and ‘Justice’ will be brought out of retirement. All will be equal before the law and no particular group’s ‘interests’ will be put above another’s, even if they are only two foot tall or have genitals of a particular kind. Law will take its place as a subordinate of Justice.
There will be much rejoicing by those on the Left, as, for a while, I will institute just the sort of Court processes they seem to love. Just for them. Secret Courts; guilty until they prove themselves innocent; the judicious use of accusation from all and sundry; no need for evidence; blind eye to perjury; lots of whimsical technicalities. Oh my. There will be fun for all. I might even televise some. They love that sort of thing. Reality TV.
Dispossession will be a normal base level punishment. Restitution and recompense for all that these parasites and thieves have abused, good people, mainly chaps as it happens, will take some time. The rest of some Judges and lawyers’ lives I imagine. Their families and friends are going to be thoroughly pissed off with them.
For the rest of ‘We the People’ it is back to the Magna Carta and Habeus Corpus. Justice, Truth. Equality.
The 'system' will go into shock. The NOW brigade would be wound-up as the terrorist AgitProp organisation that it is. Everyday people will be in shock too and have plenty of opportunity to examine their conciences.I don’t pretend, even to myself, that most people are going to be happy with my rule, at first, so it will have to be by Presidential Fiat. Heads will roll and one or two might squeak a protest or two before the vocal chords get the chop. But think teenagers being grounded. Its for their own good. You know it makes sense.
I shall have to ‘ground’ Congress for a few months and there may well be some promotions and pay rises in the Police forces. There will be a few recruitment opportunities there too. They will be given some latitude in dealing with crims that have previously untouchable, due to their ‘knowing’ people in high places, and there might be a bit of biffo internally too. But I have confidence that our boys in blue in our cities and hamlets will take to the job of being real American men at last with some gusto and happily do what is needed with the Judges and lawyers - their natural enemy. The crims will not have the luxury of spending their stolen and ill-gotten gains paying for lawyers to get them off. They won’t reach Court. There will be few Courts to reach anyway, most being very, very busy with internal matters. And lawyers will be thin on the ground. There might be some on television. Not real ones.
The wholesale restructuring of the National Character will be underway from such leadership. There will be plenty of opportunity for MRM action and focus. Every other Western country will follow suit with uprisings within a few months.
Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum
Love the Sinner but not the Sin.
(St. Augustine)
“ For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers,
against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. “
(and within ourselves)
(Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)
A Feminist is a human being who has lost her way and turned vicious.
If you meet one on the road as you Go your Own Way,
offer kindness but keep your sword drawn.
(Me)
You may also enjoy reading the following threads, why not give them a try?
-
Male Psychology - Interview With Angry Harry & Erin PizzeyBy Marx in forum MRA - YoutubersReplies: 3Last Post: 12th-February-2010, 07:34 PM -
Angry feminists violate male employee's civil rights
By frostyboy in forum Discrimination & Sexist Double StandardsReplies: 5Last Post: 26th-March-2008, 06:14 AM -
They don't like their own medicine: Male Teacher Quota Sets Off Angry Debate
By Rebadow in forum Discrimination & Sexist Double StandardsReplies: 14Last Post: 24th-October-2007, 06:43 PM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks









Reply With Quote







Bookmarks